A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda

Arho Suominen, Marko Seppänen, Ozgur Dedehayir

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    Purpose: The ecosystem perspective on innovation and business has emerged as the secret sauce of innovative organizations. While its theoretical foundations are premised on innovation system literature, the broad adoption of the ecosystem concept has resulted in conceptual ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to tackle the ambiguous use of innovation ecosystem terminology and structure a conceptual frame for the field, identifying definitions of an innovation ecosystem and how the concept has been established in previous literature. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the ambiguous use of terminology by reviewing the literature with bibliometric coupling and co-citation analysis by which thematic differences in ecosystem literature were identified. The study gathered the scientific publications from Thomson Reuters Web of Sciences Core Collection (n=4,681) from 1990 to 2015. Findings: Six major bibliometrically coupled clusters were identified, of which the three largest clusters are innovation system studies, regional innovation studies and technological innovation studies. In addition, further analysis shows an emerging cluster that is focused on ecosystems, having its roots in eight seminal papers. This ecosystem research cluster includes seven sub-clusters, such as innovation ecosystem studies, business ecosystem studies and studies focusing on ecosystem development. Research limitations/implications: The authors’ approach highlights how a lot of recent ecosystem studies actually belong to previous, well-developed research streams. However, there is also a separate, emergent research stream that includes the innovation and ecosystem studies. As a research implication, the paper concludes by suggesting the research agenda for further studies. Originality/value: Even though literature on innovation systems and ecosystems is extensive literature, no studies have captured the emergence of the ecosystems approach and its relation with the systems of innovation literature.

    LanguageEnglish
    Number of pages26
    JournalEuropean Journal of Innovation Management
    DOIs
    Publication statusAccepted/In press - 24 Aug 2018
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Fingerprint

    Ecosystems
    Innovation
    Terminology
    Ecosystem
    Innovation system
    Research agenda
    Bibliometrics
    Industry

    Keywords

    • Bibliometric
    • Ecosystem
    • Innovation
    • Strategy

    OKM Publication Types

    • A1 Refereed journal article

    OKM Open Access Status

    • 0 Not Open Access

    ASJC Scopus subject areas

    • Management of Technology and Innovation

    Cite this

    @article{9f1046cd395a4f0b8a7440faabf3973c,
    title = "A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems: a research agenda",
    abstract = "Purpose: The ecosystem perspective on innovation and business has emerged as the secret sauce of innovative organizations. While its theoretical foundations are premised on innovation system literature, the broad adoption of the ecosystem concept has resulted in conceptual ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to tackle the ambiguous use of innovation ecosystem terminology and structure a conceptual frame for the field, identifying definitions of an innovation ecosystem and how the concept has been established in previous literature. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the ambiguous use of terminology by reviewing the literature with bibliometric coupling and co-citation analysis by which thematic differences in ecosystem literature were identified. The study gathered the scientific publications from Thomson Reuters Web of Sciences Core Collection (n=4,681) from 1990 to 2015. Findings: Six major bibliometrically coupled clusters were identified, of which the three largest clusters are innovation system studies, regional innovation studies and technological innovation studies. In addition, further analysis shows an emerging cluster that is focused on ecosystems, having its roots in eight seminal papers. This ecosystem research cluster includes seven sub-clusters, such as innovation ecosystem studies, business ecosystem studies and studies focusing on ecosystem development. Research limitations/implications: The authors’ approach highlights how a lot of recent ecosystem studies actually belong to previous, well-developed research streams. However, there is also a separate, emergent research stream that includes the innovation and ecosystem studies. As a research implication, the paper concludes by suggesting the research agenda for further studies. Originality/value: Even though literature on innovation systems and ecosystems is extensive literature, no studies have captured the emergence of the ecosystems approach and its relation with the systems of innovation literature.",
    keywords = "Bibliometric, Ecosystem, Innovation, Strategy",
    author = "Arho Suominen and Marko Sepp{\"a}nen and Ozgur Dedehayir",
    year = "2018",
    month = "8",
    day = "24",
    doi = "10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188",
    language = "English",
    journal = "European Journal of Innovation Management",
    issn = "1460-1060",
    publisher = "Emerald Publishing Limited",

    }

    A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems : a research agenda. / Suominen, Arho; Seppänen, Marko; Dedehayir, Ozgur.

    In: European Journal of Innovation Management, 24.08.2018.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A bibliometric review on innovation systems and ecosystems

    T2 - European Journal of Innovation Management

    AU - Suominen, Arho

    AU - Seppänen, Marko

    AU - Dedehayir, Ozgur

    PY - 2018/8/24

    Y1 - 2018/8/24

    N2 - Purpose: The ecosystem perspective on innovation and business has emerged as the secret sauce of innovative organizations. While its theoretical foundations are premised on innovation system literature, the broad adoption of the ecosystem concept has resulted in conceptual ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to tackle the ambiguous use of innovation ecosystem terminology and structure a conceptual frame for the field, identifying definitions of an innovation ecosystem and how the concept has been established in previous literature. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the ambiguous use of terminology by reviewing the literature with bibliometric coupling and co-citation analysis by which thematic differences in ecosystem literature were identified. The study gathered the scientific publications from Thomson Reuters Web of Sciences Core Collection (n=4,681) from 1990 to 2015. Findings: Six major bibliometrically coupled clusters were identified, of which the three largest clusters are innovation system studies, regional innovation studies and technological innovation studies. In addition, further analysis shows an emerging cluster that is focused on ecosystems, having its roots in eight seminal papers. This ecosystem research cluster includes seven sub-clusters, such as innovation ecosystem studies, business ecosystem studies and studies focusing on ecosystem development. Research limitations/implications: The authors’ approach highlights how a lot of recent ecosystem studies actually belong to previous, well-developed research streams. However, there is also a separate, emergent research stream that includes the innovation and ecosystem studies. As a research implication, the paper concludes by suggesting the research agenda for further studies. Originality/value: Even though literature on innovation systems and ecosystems is extensive literature, no studies have captured the emergence of the ecosystems approach and its relation with the systems of innovation literature.

    AB - Purpose: The ecosystem perspective on innovation and business has emerged as the secret sauce of innovative organizations. While its theoretical foundations are premised on innovation system literature, the broad adoption of the ecosystem concept has resulted in conceptual ambiguity. The purpose of this paper is to tackle the ambiguous use of innovation ecosystem terminology and structure a conceptual frame for the field, identifying definitions of an innovation ecosystem and how the concept has been established in previous literature. Design/methodology/approach: This paper examines the ambiguous use of terminology by reviewing the literature with bibliometric coupling and co-citation analysis by which thematic differences in ecosystem literature were identified. The study gathered the scientific publications from Thomson Reuters Web of Sciences Core Collection (n=4,681) from 1990 to 2015. Findings: Six major bibliometrically coupled clusters were identified, of which the three largest clusters are innovation system studies, regional innovation studies and technological innovation studies. In addition, further analysis shows an emerging cluster that is focused on ecosystems, having its roots in eight seminal papers. This ecosystem research cluster includes seven sub-clusters, such as innovation ecosystem studies, business ecosystem studies and studies focusing on ecosystem development. Research limitations/implications: The authors’ approach highlights how a lot of recent ecosystem studies actually belong to previous, well-developed research streams. However, there is also a separate, emergent research stream that includes the innovation and ecosystem studies. As a research implication, the paper concludes by suggesting the research agenda for further studies. Originality/value: Even though literature on innovation systems and ecosystems is extensive literature, no studies have captured the emergence of the ecosystems approach and its relation with the systems of innovation literature.

    KW - Bibliometric

    KW - Ecosystem

    KW - Innovation

    KW - Strategy

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85054829437&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188

    DO - 10.1108/EJIM-12-2017-0188

    M3 - Article

    JO - European Journal of Innovation Management

    JF - European Journal of Innovation Management

    SN - 1460-1060

    ER -