Abstract
Apparent shear and dynamic complex viscosity measurements at 200°C and 230°C, for a series of blends of a homopolypropylene (PPVC) with maleic anhydride polypropylene (PP-g-MA) and blends of an ethylene‐propylene copolymer (PPSC) with PP-g-MA, are reported. The data were taken using a capillary rheometer and a dynamic mechanical thermal analyzer. The results are analyzed in terms of the Cox-Merz rule. Data taken at 230°C for both matrices (viz. PPVC and PPSC) follow the Cox-Merz rule. However, deviations are noted in the blends, especially in compositions wherein PP-g-MA content is above 10 wt%. Cross phase separation and charges in the dispersed phase size (of PP-g-MA) in the two types of measurement appear to be the cause of the failure of the Cox-Merz rule.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 18-23 |
| Journal | Polymer Engineering and Science |
| Volume | 37 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 1997 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between apparent viscosity and dynamic complex viscosity for polypropylene/maleated polypropylene blends'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver