A comparison of bluetooth low power modes

Olli Karjalainen, Seppo Rantala, Markku Kivikoski

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper is an investigation about the performance of the three Bluetooth low power modes (i.e. hold, sniff and park). The performance metrics of interest were response times from master to slave, from slave to master, and the current consumptions in each mode. From these low power modes the sniff mode offers generally the best response times whereas parked devices have the smallest current consumption. Since the characteristics of each mode offer different functions to the Bluetooth system itself, the final usage defines which mode should be selected.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of 7th Internatioal Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2003
PublisherIEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers
Pages121-128
ISBN (Print)953-184-052-0
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

Keywords

  • bluetooth
  • low power
  • park
  • sniff
  • hold

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison of bluetooth low power modes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Karjalainen, O., Rantala, S., & Kivikoski, M. (2003). A comparison of bluetooth low power modes. In Proceedings of 7th Internatioal Conference on Telecommunications, ConTEL 2003 (pp. 121-128). IEEE Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1109/CONTEL.2003.176900