A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods

Martin Hildebrand

Research output: Book/ReportReport

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The main objective of this project is to identify the test methods which provide useful results for the different types of penetrating impacts occurring in sandwich structures. A series of penetrating impact tests on FRP-sandwich panels is performed using three different test methods and the results of the test methods are compared. The test methods used are the standardised method ISO 6603 and two non-standardised methods. The first non-standardised method uses a pyramid-shaped impactor instead of the cylindrical impactor used in the ISO 6603 method. In the second non-standardised method, the impact test is performed quasi-statically using a cylindrical impactor. Possible stages of failure occurring in FRP-sandwich during a penetrating impact are illustrated. A comprehensive test method should be able to provoke various failure modes, as observed in impact failures of actual sandwich structures. The results obtained with the three test methods lead to a different ranking in impact strength of the panels. Hence, impact test results obtained with different test methods are not even qualitatively comparable. The pyramid-shaped impactor is able to generate clearly more failure modes than the cylindrical impactor in the ISO 6603 method. Therefore, it is considered to be of more practical value for determining the impact strength of FRP-sandwich structures.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages34
ISBN (Print)951-38-4939-2
Publication statusPublished - 1996
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Publication series

SeriesVTT Publications
Number281
ISSN1235-0621

Fingerprint

Sandwich structures
Impact strength
Failure modes

Keywords

  • impact tests
  • penetration tests
  • test methods
  • methods
  • tests
  • comparison
  • sandwich panels
  • sandwich structures
  • fibres
  • reinforced plastics
  • standards
  • failure
  • models
  • strength

Cite this

Hildebrand, M. (1996). A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. VTT Publications, No. 281
Hildebrand, Martin. / A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 34 p. (VTT Publications; No. 281).
@book{63c99516925645e89f710f4144228b28,
title = "A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods",
abstract = "The main objective of this project is to identify the test methods which provide useful results for the different types of penetrating impacts occurring in sandwich structures. A series of penetrating impact tests on FRP-sandwich panels is performed using three different test methods and the results of the test methods are compared. The test methods used are the standardised method ISO 6603 and two non-standardised methods. The first non-standardised method uses a pyramid-shaped impactor instead of the cylindrical impactor used in the ISO 6603 method. In the second non-standardised method, the impact test is performed quasi-statically using a cylindrical impactor. Possible stages of failure occurring in FRP-sandwich during a penetrating impact are illustrated. A comprehensive test method should be able to provoke various failure modes, as observed in impact failures of actual sandwich structures. The results obtained with the three test methods lead to a different ranking in impact strength of the panels. Hence, impact test results obtained with different test methods are not even qualitatively comparable. The pyramid-shaped impactor is able to generate clearly more failure modes than the cylindrical impactor in the ISO 6603 method. Therefore, it is considered to be of more practical value for determining the impact strength of FRP-sandwich structures.",
keywords = "impact tests, penetration tests, test methods, methods, tests, comparison, sandwich panels, sandwich structures, fibres, reinforced plastics, standards, failure, models, strength",
author = "Martin Hildebrand",
note = "Project code: V5SU00078",
year = "1996",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-4939-2",
series = "VTT Publications",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
number = "281",
address = "Finland",

}

Hildebrand, M 1996, A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods. VTT Publications, no. 281, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods. / Hildebrand, Martin.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 34 p. (VTT Publications; No. 281).

Research output: Book/ReportReport

TY - BOOK

T1 - A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods

AU - Hildebrand, Martin

N1 - Project code: V5SU00078

PY - 1996

Y1 - 1996

N2 - The main objective of this project is to identify the test methods which provide useful results for the different types of penetrating impacts occurring in sandwich structures. A series of penetrating impact tests on FRP-sandwich panels is performed using three different test methods and the results of the test methods are compared. The test methods used are the standardised method ISO 6603 and two non-standardised methods. The first non-standardised method uses a pyramid-shaped impactor instead of the cylindrical impactor used in the ISO 6603 method. In the second non-standardised method, the impact test is performed quasi-statically using a cylindrical impactor. Possible stages of failure occurring in FRP-sandwich during a penetrating impact are illustrated. A comprehensive test method should be able to provoke various failure modes, as observed in impact failures of actual sandwich structures. The results obtained with the three test methods lead to a different ranking in impact strength of the panels. Hence, impact test results obtained with different test methods are not even qualitatively comparable. The pyramid-shaped impactor is able to generate clearly more failure modes than the cylindrical impactor in the ISO 6603 method. Therefore, it is considered to be of more practical value for determining the impact strength of FRP-sandwich structures.

AB - The main objective of this project is to identify the test methods which provide useful results for the different types of penetrating impacts occurring in sandwich structures. A series of penetrating impact tests on FRP-sandwich panels is performed using three different test methods and the results of the test methods are compared. The test methods used are the standardised method ISO 6603 and two non-standardised methods. The first non-standardised method uses a pyramid-shaped impactor instead of the cylindrical impactor used in the ISO 6603 method. In the second non-standardised method, the impact test is performed quasi-statically using a cylindrical impactor. Possible stages of failure occurring in FRP-sandwich during a penetrating impact are illustrated. A comprehensive test method should be able to provoke various failure modes, as observed in impact failures of actual sandwich structures. The results obtained with the three test methods lead to a different ranking in impact strength of the panels. Hence, impact test results obtained with different test methods are not even qualitatively comparable. The pyramid-shaped impactor is able to generate clearly more failure modes than the cylindrical impactor in the ISO 6603 method. Therefore, it is considered to be of more practical value for determining the impact strength of FRP-sandwich structures.

KW - impact tests

KW - penetration tests

KW - test methods

KW - methods

KW - tests

KW - comparison

KW - sandwich panels

KW - sandwich structures

KW - fibres

KW - reinforced plastics

KW - standards

KW - failure

KW - models

KW - strength

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-4939-2

T3 - VTT Publications

BT - A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Hildebrand M. A comparison of FRP-sandwich penetrating impact test methods. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1996. 34 p. (VTT Publications; No. 281).