A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010

Mohamed Hamdy (Corresponding Author), Ala Hasan, Kai Siren

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

234 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Finding cost-optimal solutions towards nearly-zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) in accordance with European energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD-recast 2010) is a challenging task. It requires exploring a huge number of possible combinations of energy-saving measures (ESMs) and energy-supply systems including renewable energy sources (RESs), under a comparative framework methodology. The current study introduces efficient, transparent, and time-saving simulation-based optimization method for such explorations. The method is applied to find the cost-optimal and nZEB energy performance levels for a study case of a single-family house in Finland. Different options of building-envelope parameters, heat-recovery units, and heating/cooling systems as well as various sizes of thermal and photovoltaic solar systems are explored as design options via three-stage optimization. The resulted economic and environmental trade-offs show that primary energy consumption ≥93 and ≤103 kWh/m2a is a cost-optimal energy performance level. It is economically feasible to achieve nZEB with 70 kWh/m2a. However, incentives (e.g., energy credits) are required to reach lower-environmental- impact houses. Investing in low-operating-cost environmentally friendly heating system (e.g. ground source heat pump) is a key element for optimal solutions. The optimal implementation of ESMs and RES depends significantly on the installed heating/cooling system and the escalation rate of the energy price.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)189-203
Number of pages15
JournalEnergy and Buildings
Volume56
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jan 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Cooling systems
Heating
Costs
Energy conservation
Geothermal heat pumps
Solar system
Waste heat utilization
Operating costs
Environmental impact
Energy utilization
Economics
Hot Temperature

Keywords

  • Cost optimality
  • EPBD 2010
  • Genetic algorithm
  • Life-cycle cost
  • Primary energy

Cite this

@article{5bd342e224a84e10b199ccdc92c364ef,
title = "A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010",
abstract = "Finding cost-optimal solutions towards nearly-zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) in accordance with European energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD-recast 2010) is a challenging task. It requires exploring a huge number of possible combinations of energy-saving measures (ESMs) and energy-supply systems including renewable energy sources (RESs), under a comparative framework methodology. The current study introduces efficient, transparent, and time-saving simulation-based optimization method for such explorations. The method is applied to find the cost-optimal and nZEB energy performance levels for a study case of a single-family house in Finland. Different options of building-envelope parameters, heat-recovery units, and heating/cooling systems as well as various sizes of thermal and photovoltaic solar systems are explored as design options via three-stage optimization. The resulted economic and environmental trade-offs show that primary energy consumption ≥93 and ≤103 kWh/m2a is a cost-optimal energy performance level. It is economically feasible to achieve nZEB with 70 kWh/m2a. However, incentives (e.g., energy credits) are required to reach lower-environmental- impact houses. Investing in low-operating-cost environmentally friendly heating system (e.g. ground source heat pump) is a key element for optimal solutions. The optimal implementation of ESMs and RES depends significantly on the installed heating/cooling system and the escalation rate of the energy price.",
keywords = "Cost optimality, EPBD 2010, Genetic algorithm, Life-cycle cost, Primary energy",
author = "Mohamed Hamdy and Ala Hasan and Kai Siren",
year = "2013",
month = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.023",
language = "English",
volume = "56",
pages = "189--203",
journal = "Energy and Buildings",
issn = "0378-7788",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010. / Hamdy, Mohamed (Corresponding Author); Hasan, Ala; Siren, Kai.

In: Energy and Buildings, Vol. 56, 01.2013, p. 189-203.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A multi-stage optimization method for cost-optimal and nearly-zero-energy building solutions in line with the EPBD-recast 2010

AU - Hamdy, Mohamed

AU - Hasan, Ala

AU - Siren, Kai

PY - 2013/1

Y1 - 2013/1

N2 - Finding cost-optimal solutions towards nearly-zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) in accordance with European energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD-recast 2010) is a challenging task. It requires exploring a huge number of possible combinations of energy-saving measures (ESMs) and energy-supply systems including renewable energy sources (RESs), under a comparative framework methodology. The current study introduces efficient, transparent, and time-saving simulation-based optimization method for such explorations. The method is applied to find the cost-optimal and nZEB energy performance levels for a study case of a single-family house in Finland. Different options of building-envelope parameters, heat-recovery units, and heating/cooling systems as well as various sizes of thermal and photovoltaic solar systems are explored as design options via three-stage optimization. The resulted economic and environmental trade-offs show that primary energy consumption ≥93 and ≤103 kWh/m2a is a cost-optimal energy performance level. It is economically feasible to achieve nZEB with 70 kWh/m2a. However, incentives (e.g., energy credits) are required to reach lower-environmental- impact houses. Investing in low-operating-cost environmentally friendly heating system (e.g. ground source heat pump) is a key element for optimal solutions. The optimal implementation of ESMs and RES depends significantly on the installed heating/cooling system and the escalation rate of the energy price.

AB - Finding cost-optimal solutions towards nearly-zero-energy buildings (nZEBs) in accordance with European energy performance of buildings directive (EPBD-recast 2010) is a challenging task. It requires exploring a huge number of possible combinations of energy-saving measures (ESMs) and energy-supply systems including renewable energy sources (RESs), under a comparative framework methodology. The current study introduces efficient, transparent, and time-saving simulation-based optimization method for such explorations. The method is applied to find the cost-optimal and nZEB energy performance levels for a study case of a single-family house in Finland. Different options of building-envelope parameters, heat-recovery units, and heating/cooling systems as well as various sizes of thermal and photovoltaic solar systems are explored as design options via three-stage optimization. The resulted economic and environmental trade-offs show that primary energy consumption ≥93 and ≤103 kWh/m2a is a cost-optimal energy performance level. It is economically feasible to achieve nZEB with 70 kWh/m2a. However, incentives (e.g., energy credits) are required to reach lower-environmental- impact houses. Investing in low-operating-cost environmentally friendly heating system (e.g. ground source heat pump) is a key element for optimal solutions. The optimal implementation of ESMs and RES depends significantly on the installed heating/cooling system and the escalation rate of the energy price.

KW - Cost optimality

KW - EPBD 2010

KW - Genetic algorithm

KW - Life-cycle cost

KW - Primary energy

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84870668912&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.023

DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.08.023

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84870668912

VL - 56

SP - 189

EP - 203

JO - Energy and Buildings

JF - Energy and Buildings

SN - 0378-7788

ER -