A Participatory approach to the parallel evaluation of public and private well-being services

Inka Lappalainen (Corresponding Author), Minna Kansola

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The objective of this paper is to describe a participatory approach for evaluating public and private well-being services in parallel in order to support the adoption of multiple supplier models. The study was carried out as a case study, based on multiple data-collection methods such as thematic personnel interviews, customer surveys and activity-based cost analysis. The study produced two main findings. Firstly, it provided concrete and contextual results for case representatives in intensive residential services for the elderly and in primary health care. Secondly, an integrative evaluation framework was created, along with a participatory process with methods for benchmarking and facilitating multiple suppliers in well-being services. Thus the study provides new insights, from practice to theoretical discussion, as well as multi-voiced knowledge, participatory evaluation methods and benchmarking possibilities for case organisations, municipalities and political decision-makers and, ultimately, for all interest groups in well-being services.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)424-436
    Number of pages13
    JournalJournal of US-China Public Administration
    Volume9
    Issue number4
    Publication statusPublished - 2012
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Fingerprint

    well-being
    benchmarking
    evaluation
    supplier
    political decision
    data collection method
    interest group
    municipality
    decision maker
    personnel
    customer
    health care
    costs
    interview

    Keywords

    • participatory evaluation
    • benchmarking
    • multiple supplier models
    • well-being services

    Cite this

    @article{483ce931cce44cfab859301ffd9e8914,
    title = "A Participatory approach to the parallel evaluation of public and private well-being services",
    abstract = "The objective of this paper is to describe a participatory approach for evaluating public and private well-being services in parallel in order to support the adoption of multiple supplier models. The study was carried out as a case study, based on multiple data-collection methods such as thematic personnel interviews, customer surveys and activity-based cost analysis. The study produced two main findings. Firstly, it provided concrete and contextual results for case representatives in intensive residential services for the elderly and in primary health care. Secondly, an integrative evaluation framework was created, along with a participatory process with methods for benchmarking and facilitating multiple suppliers in well-being services. Thus the study provides new insights, from practice to theoretical discussion, as well as multi-voiced knowledge, participatory evaluation methods and benchmarking possibilities for case organisations, municipalities and political decision-makers and, ultimately, for all interest groups in well-being services.",
    keywords = "participatory evaluation, benchmarking, multiple supplier models, well-being services",
    author = "Inka Lappalainen and Minna Kansola",
    note = "Project code: 36832",
    year = "2012",
    language = "English",
    volume = "9",
    pages = "424--436",
    journal = "Journal of US-China Public Administration",
    issn = "1548-6591",
    number = "4",

    }

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A Participatory approach to the parallel evaluation of public and private well-being services

    AU - Lappalainen, Inka

    AU - Kansola, Minna

    N1 - Project code: 36832

    PY - 2012

    Y1 - 2012

    N2 - The objective of this paper is to describe a participatory approach for evaluating public and private well-being services in parallel in order to support the adoption of multiple supplier models. The study was carried out as a case study, based on multiple data-collection methods such as thematic personnel interviews, customer surveys and activity-based cost analysis. The study produced two main findings. Firstly, it provided concrete and contextual results for case representatives in intensive residential services for the elderly and in primary health care. Secondly, an integrative evaluation framework was created, along with a participatory process with methods for benchmarking and facilitating multiple suppliers in well-being services. Thus the study provides new insights, from practice to theoretical discussion, as well as multi-voiced knowledge, participatory evaluation methods and benchmarking possibilities for case organisations, municipalities and political decision-makers and, ultimately, for all interest groups in well-being services.

    AB - The objective of this paper is to describe a participatory approach for evaluating public and private well-being services in parallel in order to support the adoption of multiple supplier models. The study was carried out as a case study, based on multiple data-collection methods such as thematic personnel interviews, customer surveys and activity-based cost analysis. The study produced two main findings. Firstly, it provided concrete and contextual results for case representatives in intensive residential services for the elderly and in primary health care. Secondly, an integrative evaluation framework was created, along with a participatory process with methods for benchmarking and facilitating multiple suppliers in well-being services. Thus the study provides new insights, from practice to theoretical discussion, as well as multi-voiced knowledge, participatory evaluation methods and benchmarking possibilities for case organisations, municipalities and political decision-makers and, ultimately, for all interest groups in well-being services.

    KW - participatory evaluation

    KW - benchmarking

    KW - multiple supplier models

    KW - well-being services

    M3 - Article

    VL - 9

    SP - 424

    EP - 436

    JO - Journal of US-China Public Administration

    JF - Journal of US-China Public Administration

    SN - 1548-6591

    IS - 4

    ER -