A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling

Erkki Jantunen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

224 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)997-1010
JournalInternational Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
Volume42
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2002
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Condition monitoring
Drilling
Monitoring
Signal analysis
Vibration measurement
Force measurement
Electric current measurement
Fast Fourier transforms
Wavelet transforms
Wear of materials

Keywords

  • tool wear
  • drilling
  • monitoring methods
  • signal analysis
  • diagnostic tools

Cite this

@article{de822ba94ae54f8c966783abaaa55e7d,
title = "A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling",
abstract = "This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.",
keywords = "tool wear, drilling, monitoring methods, signal analysis, diagnostic tools",
author = "Erkki Jantunen",
year = "2002",
doi = "10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "997--1010",
journal = "International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture",
issn = "0890-6955",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "9",

}

A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling. / Jantunen, Erkki.

In: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2002, p. 997-1010.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling

AU - Jantunen, Erkki

PY - 2002

Y1 - 2002

N2 - This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.

AB - This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.

KW - tool wear

KW - drilling

KW - monitoring methods

KW - signal analysis

KW - diagnostic tools

U2 - 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8

DO - 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8

M3 - Article

VL - 42

SP - 997

EP - 1010

JO - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

JF - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

SN - 0890-6955

IS - 9

ER -