A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling

Erkki Jantunen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    231 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)997-1010
    JournalInternational Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture
    Volume42
    Issue number9
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2002
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Condition monitoring
    Drilling
    Monitoring
    Signal analysis
    Vibration measurement
    Force measurement
    Electric current measurement
    Fast Fourier transforms
    Wavelet transforms
    Wear of materials

    Keywords

    • tool wear
    • drilling
    • monitoring methods
    • signal analysis
    • diagnostic tools

    Cite this

    @article{de822ba94ae54f8c966783abaaa55e7d,
    title = "A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling",
    abstract = "This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.",
    keywords = "tool wear, drilling, monitoring methods, signal analysis, diagnostic tools",
    author = "Erkki Jantunen",
    year = "2002",
    doi = "10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8",
    language = "English",
    volume = "42",
    pages = "997--1010",
    journal = "International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture",
    issn = "0890-6955",
    publisher = "Elsevier",
    number = "9",

    }

    A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling. / Jantunen, Erkki.

    In: International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture, Vol. 42, No. 9, 2002, p. 997-1010.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - A summary of methods applied to tool condition monitoring in drilling

    AU - Jantunen, Erkki

    PY - 2002

    Y1 - 2002

    N2 - This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.

    AB - This paper presents a summary of the monitoring methods, signal analysis and diagnostic techniques for tool wear and failure monitoring in drilling that have been tested and reported in the literature. The paper covers only indirect monitoring methods such as force, vibration and current measurements, i.e. direct monitoring methods based on dimensional measurement etc. are not included. Signal analysis techniques cover all the methods that have been used with indirect measurements including e.g. statistical parameters and Fast Fourier and Wavelet Transform. Only a limited number of automatic diagnostic tools have been developed for diagnosis of the condition of the tool in drilling. All of these rather diverse approaches that have been available are covered in this study. In the reported material there are both success stories and also those that have not been so successful. Only in a few of the papers have attempts been made to compare the chosen approach with other methods. Many of the papers only present one approach and unfortunately quite often the test material of the study is limited especially in what comes to the cutting process parameter variation, i.e. variation of cutting speed, feed rate, drill diameter and material and also workpiece material.

    KW - tool wear

    KW - drilling

    KW - monitoring methods

    KW - signal analysis

    KW - diagnostic tools

    U2 - 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8

    DO - 10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00040-8

    M3 - Article

    VL - 42

    SP - 997

    EP - 1010

    JO - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    JF - International Journal of Machine Tools and Manufacture

    SN - 0890-6955

    IS - 9

    ER -