Abstract
Our cities should be designed to accommodate everybody,
including children. We will not move toward a more
sustainable society unless we accept that children are
people with transportation needs, and 'bussing' them
around, or providing parental limousine services at all
times, will not lead to sustainability. Rather, we will
need to make our cities walkable for children, at least
those above a certain age. Safety has two main aspects,
traffic safety and personal safety (risk of assault).
Besides being safe, children will also need an urban
environment with reasonable mobility, where they
themselves can reach destinations with reasonable effort;
else they will still need to be driven. This paper
presents the results of two expert questionnaires
focusing on the potential safety and mobility benefits to
child pedestrians of targeted types of intelligent
transportation systems (ITS). Five different types of
functional requests for children were identified based on
previous work. The first expert questionnaire was
structured to collect expert opinions on which ITS
solutions or devices would be, and why, the most relevant
ones to satisfy the five different functional requests of
child pedestrians. Based on the first questionnaire,
fifteen problem areas were defined. In the second
questionnaire, the experts ranked the fifteen areas, and
prioritized related ITS services, according to their
potential for developing ITS services beneficial to
children. Several ITS systems for improving pedestrian
quality are discussed. ITS services can be used when a
pedestrian route takes them to a dangerous street,
dangerous crossing point or through a dangerous
neighborhood. An improvement of safety and other
qualities would lead to increased mobility and a more
sustainable way of living. Children would learn how to
live to support their own health and a sustainable city
environment. But it will be up to national, regional and
local governments, through their ministries and agencies
and public works departments, to promote, fund, and
possibly mandate such systems. It is clear that we need
to offer an acceptable level of convenience, efficiency,
comfort, safety and security to pedestrians but it is
less clear if society will prioritize resources toward
this.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 406-414 |
Journal | Accident Analysis and Prevention |
Volume | 62 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2014 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- children
- intelligent transportation systems
- mobility
- safety
- survey