TY - JOUR
T1 - Absorbing radical ideas from unusual sources
T2 - the role of social integration mechanisms
AU - Pihlajamaa, Matti
N1 - Funding Information:
This work was supported by Tekes – the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation and the KAUTE foundation (KAUTE-Säätiö).
Funding Information:
This work was supported by Tekes?the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation and the KAUTE foundation (KAUTE-S??ti?).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - If companies rely strongly on internal R&D and existing networks their ability to introduce radical innovations may suffer. Opening up to new idea sources may provide a solution. Incumbent companies, however, often suffer from the tendency to reject radical ideas from unusual sources. This study investigates how social integration mechanisms (coordination, socialisation, and systems mechanisms) influence an incumbent steel company’s absorptive capacity (AC). A micro-level analysis of two radical ideas from unusual sources contributes to AC and radical innovation literatures by exploring relationships between social integration mechanisms and four AC capabilities (acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation). The findings suggest that AC capabilities are context specific with respect to innovation novelty and idea source. The results emphasize the negative sides of socialisation and formalisation mechanisms, and the positive effects of coordination mechanisms on the AC capabilities in such high uncertainty contexts.
AB - If companies rely strongly on internal R&D and existing networks their ability to introduce radical innovations may suffer. Opening up to new idea sources may provide a solution. Incumbent companies, however, often suffer from the tendency to reject radical ideas from unusual sources. This study investigates how social integration mechanisms (coordination, socialisation, and systems mechanisms) influence an incumbent steel company’s absorptive capacity (AC). A micro-level analysis of two radical ideas from unusual sources contributes to AC and radical innovation literatures by exploring relationships between social integration mechanisms and four AC capabilities (acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation). The findings suggest that AC capabilities are context specific with respect to innovation novelty and idea source. The results emphasize the negative sides of socialisation and formalisation mechanisms, and the positive effects of coordination mechanisms on the AC capabilities in such high uncertainty contexts.
KW - absorptive capacity
KW - radical innovation
KW - technology and innovation studies
KW - case study
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85014564116&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1080/09537325.2017.1297398
DO - 10.1080/09537325.2017.1297398
M3 - Article
SN - 0953-7325
VL - 30
SP - 131
EP - 143
JO - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
JF - Technology Analysis and Strategic Management
IS - 2
ER -