TY - CHAP
T1 - Accelerating innovation with service dominant logic
AU - Toivonen, Marja
AU - Ylén, Peter
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - In recent decades, innovation has been considered a
crucial factor in the fostering of business growth and
societal welfare. This emphasis is linked to the
increasing rate of change and the significance of
knowledge in modern economies. At the beginning of the
'knowledge economy' discussion in the 1990s,
strengthening the knowledge base was seen as a central
task. Today, learning is the core aim: what matters is
not so much the knowledge possessed by agents and
organisations at a certain point in time as the
capability of rapid learning. This focus brings new
knowledge and innovation to the fore - the knowledge
economy is fundamentally an innovation driven economy
[1].
On the other hand, businesses, other organisations, and
policymakers face many challenges when they implement the
innovation-driven view. Slowness and lack of radical
thoughts are among the most typical concerns. Several
researchers have linked these problems to overly narrow,
science based thoughts about the nature of innovation and
suggested that a more efficient approach can be achieved
when innovation is seen as intertwined and co-evolving
with practical activities. 'Learning-by-doing',
'learning-by-using', and 'learning-by-interacting' have
been highlighted as essential in the emergence of
innovations [2]. This 'broad view of innovation' -
meaning in many respects a return to the original theory
of Schumpeter (1934) - has been influential among
innovation scholars, but less among practitioners. One
apparent bottleneck is the lack of such alternative
innovation models as would provide a credible alternative
to the process model in which innovations are pursued on
the basis of in-house R&D activities.
We propose that one approach for addressing these
challenges is to analyse how service-dominant logic (SDL)
contributes to the building of an alternative innovation
model. We have selected this approach as our starting
point for four reasons. First, it is applicable in all
kinds of companies and other organisations, in both
manufacturing and service sectors. Second, it summarises
several approaches that have pursued a broader
perspective outside the dyad of the producer and the
customer. Third, it is in line with the broad view of
innovation. Fourth, it fosters a radically new way of
thinking about the principles of economic activity. From
the standpoint of innovation, the core benefit of SDL is
that it focuses on complex and dynamic systems of actors
that relationally co-create value and, at the same time,
jointly provide the context through which 'value' gains
its collective and individual assessment [3].
AB - In recent decades, innovation has been considered a
crucial factor in the fostering of business growth and
societal welfare. This emphasis is linked to the
increasing rate of change and the significance of
knowledge in modern economies. At the beginning of the
'knowledge economy' discussion in the 1990s,
strengthening the knowledge base was seen as a central
task. Today, learning is the core aim: what matters is
not so much the knowledge possessed by agents and
organisations at a certain point in time as the
capability of rapid learning. This focus brings new
knowledge and innovation to the fore - the knowledge
economy is fundamentally an innovation driven economy
[1].
On the other hand, businesses, other organisations, and
policymakers face many challenges when they implement the
innovation-driven view. Slowness and lack of radical
thoughts are among the most typical concerns. Several
researchers have linked these problems to overly narrow,
science based thoughts about the nature of innovation and
suggested that a more efficient approach can be achieved
when innovation is seen as intertwined and co-evolving
with practical activities. 'Learning-by-doing',
'learning-by-using', and 'learning-by-interacting' have
been highlighted as essential in the emergence of
innovations [2]. This 'broad view of innovation' -
meaning in many respects a return to the original theory
of Schumpeter (1934) - has been influential among
innovation scholars, but less among practitioners. One
apparent bottleneck is the lack of such alternative
innovation models as would provide a credible alternative
to the process model in which innovations are pursued on
the basis of in-house R&D activities.
We propose that one approach for addressing these
challenges is to analyse how service-dominant logic (SDL)
contributes to the building of an alternative innovation
model. We have selected this approach as our starting
point for four reasons. First, it is applicable in all
kinds of companies and other organisations, in both
manufacturing and service sectors. Second, it summarises
several approaches that have pursued a broader
perspective outside the dyad of the producer and the
customer. Third, it is in line with the broad view of
innovation. Fourth, it fosters a radically new way of
thinking about the principles of economic activity. From
the standpoint of innovation, the core benefit of SDL is
that it focuses on complex and dynamic systems of actors
that relationally co-create value and, at the same time,
jointly provide the context through which 'value' gains
its collective and individual assessment [3].
M3 - Chapter or book article
SN - 978-951-38-7968-6
T3 - VTT Research Highlights
SP - 19
EP - 22
BT - Highlights in service research
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
ER -