Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Activation parameters from nanoindentation repeated creep experiments: Spherical indenter vs cylindrical flat punch

  • Suprit P. Bhusare*
  • , Nidhin George Mathews
  • , Verena Maier-Kiener
  • , Daniel Kiener
  • , Johann Michler
  • , Brad L. Boyce
  • , Gaurav Mohanty
  • *Corresponding author for this work
  • Tampere University
  • University of Leoben
  • Swiss Federal Laboratories for Materials Science and Technology (EMPA)
  • Sandia National Laboratories

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

This study explores a repeated creep indentation approach to investigate the underlying deformation mechanisms in metals by extracting key deformation activation parameters. Using a thermally stable in-situ nanoindenter, repeated indentation creep tests were performed on nanocrystalline (nc) nickel (Ni), and the results were systematically compared with corresponding micropillar compression experiments. To explore the influence of tip geometry and material response, two distinct non-self-similar indenter geometries, spherical and cylindrical flat punch indenters, were used. The spherical indenter exhibited a linear decay in stress relaxation with increasing depth, while the flat punch showed minimal stress relaxation (∼10 MPa) on nc Ni. This behavior is reflected in the extracted activation parameters: for the spherical indenter, the activation volume increased linearly with representative indentation strain from 4.25 to 13.7 b3, whereas for the flat punch, it remained stable at 11.8 ± 1.5 b3. Due to obtaining consistent activation parameters with the cylindrical flat punch, it was further used to perform repeated indentation creep tests on single-crystal chromium (sx Cr) and single-crystal nickel (sx Ni). These tests demonstrated the reliability of the cylindrical flat punch geometry in capturing activation parameters across different material systems.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3650-3662
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Materials Research and Technology
Volume42
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2026
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

G.M. and S.P.B. acknowledge funding from Research Council of Finland (RCF) grant 341050, Jenny and Antti Wihuri Foundation grant 00240029 and Finnish Cultural Foundation grant 50251175. This work utilized facilities of Tampere Microscopy Center (TMC) and OperaRI (funded through RCF grants 353235 and 367603). D.K. acknowledges financial support by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under project number 10.55776/I6575. B.L.B. was supported by the DOE Office of Science, Basic Energy Science, Materials Science and Engineering Division.

Keywords

  • Impression creep
  • Repeated creep
  • Nanoindentation
  • Activation volumes
  • Strain rate sensitivity
  • Deformation mechanisms

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Activation parameters from nanoindentation repeated creep experiments: Spherical indenter vs cylindrical flat punch'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this