Abstract
Both nuclear power plants in Finland are modernizing their automation
systems, human-system interfaces and control rooms. Due to this ongoing
process, analog panel-based human system interfaces will be replaced with
digital instrumentations. The upcoming change is expected to have an effect on
operators’ work practices. We are participating in the modernization of
nuclear power plant control rooms and in the design of new collaborative tools
for those. In the design of complex industrial information systems finding a
proper balance between theory-driven and practice-driven approaches is
essential, e.g. to decide how to exploit the information from studies of user
practices in the functional modelling of the to-be-designed systems. We are
convinced that a link between theory and praxis is at best developed in a
collaborative communication process between designers, researchers and
operators. The method we have used is a mixture of different types of
techniques within the context of participatory design. A technique that has
shown to be especially useful is based on dialogic communication between
researchers and process experts. An attempt to build up a dialogic
relationship between different stakeholders takes place in a special kind of
future workshops arranged. The workshops aim to bridge the gap between and to
integrate expertise of different actors in a way that makes possible to
illuminate the phenomenon from different perspectives. The workshop
participants first develop in small groups a future plan in which the actual
state is imagined from the future perspective by considering which kind of
problems they have at the moment and by which way the problems could be
tackled within a longer term perspective. Secondly, reflective thinking is
promoted by letting each group at the time to present their ideas while others
are listening. We have found that since the nuclear power process is very
complex, profound expertise in the nuclear field is a key prerequisite for
success in the design of new tools for the CR environment. We have also found
that the development of mutual understanding between different stakeholders is
a complex process that needs time. Even though the used dialogic method has
shown to be promising, new ways to build communication and understanding
between operators, researchers and designers are required.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Activity Analyses for Developing Work |
Subtitle of host publication | Book of Abstracts |
Place of Publication | Helsinki |
Publisher | Finnish Institute of Occupational Health |
ISBN (Print) | 978-951-802-836-2 |
Publication status | Published - 2008 |
MoE publication type | Not Eligible |
Event | International Ergonomic Association Symposium, ACTIVITY 2008 - Helsinki, Finland Duration: 12 May 2008 → 14 May 2008 |
Conference
Conference | International Ergonomic Association Symposium, ACTIVITY 2008 |
---|---|
Abbreviated title | ACTIVITY 2008 |
Country/Territory | Finland |
City | Helsinki |
Period | 12/05/08 → 14/05/08 |