Additionality of EU framework programmes

Terttu Luukkonen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

98 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This paper draws attention to problems inherent in the routine application of the concept of additionality in evaluation. It exemplifies these problems by expressing them in a typology based on the perceived additionality of public R&D support and the strategic value of the R&D funded. Some categories are considered to represent successes of public R&D support and others to represent failures. The paper questions such routine assumptions, and uses empirical materials from EU framework programmes, a special case of public R&D programmes, to illustrate the problems. The paper ends by suggesting that the present system of evaluation rewards short-term success, and argues that it would be more beneficial to develop evaluation procedures that stretch over a longer period and are therefore able to pick up emerging areas of important technology supported by public programmes.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)711 - 724
Number of pages14
JournalResearch Policy
Volume29
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2000
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

EU Framework Programmes
Additionality
Evaluation
Stretch
Reward
Long period

Cite this

Luukkonen, Terttu. / Additionality of EU framework programmes. In: Research Policy. 2000 ; Vol. 29, No. 6. pp. 711 - 724.
@article{cb30d75da7aa4a638e1e17567c24132e,
title = "Additionality of EU framework programmes",
abstract = "This paper draws attention to problems inherent in the routine application of the concept of additionality in evaluation. It exemplifies these problems by expressing them in a typology based on the perceived additionality of public R&D support and the strategic value of the R&D funded. Some categories are considered to represent successes of public R&D support and others to represent failures. The paper questions such routine assumptions, and uses empirical materials from EU framework programmes, a special case of public R&D programmes, to illustrate the problems. The paper ends by suggesting that the present system of evaluation rewards short-term success, and argues that it would be more beneficial to develop evaluation procedures that stretch over a longer period and are therefore able to pick up emerging areas of important technology supported by public programmes.",
author = "Terttu Luukkonen",
note = "Project code: J9SU00010",
year = "2000",
doi = "10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00041-4",
language = "English",
volume = "29",
pages = "711 -- 724",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

Additionality of EU framework programmes. / Luukkonen, Terttu.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 29, No. 6, 2000, p. 711 - 724.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Additionality of EU framework programmes

AU - Luukkonen, Terttu

N1 - Project code: J9SU00010

PY - 2000

Y1 - 2000

N2 - This paper draws attention to problems inherent in the routine application of the concept of additionality in evaluation. It exemplifies these problems by expressing them in a typology based on the perceived additionality of public R&D support and the strategic value of the R&D funded. Some categories are considered to represent successes of public R&D support and others to represent failures. The paper questions such routine assumptions, and uses empirical materials from EU framework programmes, a special case of public R&D programmes, to illustrate the problems. The paper ends by suggesting that the present system of evaluation rewards short-term success, and argues that it would be more beneficial to develop evaluation procedures that stretch over a longer period and are therefore able to pick up emerging areas of important technology supported by public programmes.

AB - This paper draws attention to problems inherent in the routine application of the concept of additionality in evaluation. It exemplifies these problems by expressing them in a typology based on the perceived additionality of public R&D support and the strategic value of the R&D funded. Some categories are considered to represent successes of public R&D support and others to represent failures. The paper questions such routine assumptions, and uses empirical materials from EU framework programmes, a special case of public R&D programmes, to illustrate the problems. The paper ends by suggesting that the present system of evaluation rewards short-term success, and argues that it would be more beneficial to develop evaluation procedures that stretch over a longer period and are therefore able to pick up emerging areas of important technology supported by public programmes.

U2 - 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00041-4

DO - 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00041-4

M3 - Article

VL - 29

SP - 711

EP - 724

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 6

ER -