Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications

Kalle Kuivalainen, Antti Oksman, Mikko Juuti, Kari Myller, Kai-Erik Peiponen (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In this paper, we present three new types of diffractive-optical-element (DOE)-based glossmeters (DOGs) that have been developed for both laboratory and online local specular gloss measurements of objects in industrial processes. The three are denoted as the handheld wireless glossmeter, µDOG two-dimensional (2D) and µDOG one-dimensional (1D), respectively. These glossmeters are designed to operate under conditions where gloss measurement with conventional glossmeters is impossible or difficult, or when fine structures of the gloss over a surface are an issue. Here, we show the applicability of the handheld glossmeter and µDOG 2D in the inspection of gloss from rough stainless steel plates finished by different machining methods. We also briefly introduce the concept of online gauge µDOG 1D for gloss assessment in industrial measurement environments.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)248-251
JournalOptical Review
Volume17
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

machining
inspection
stainless steels
fine structure

Keywords

  • Diffractive optical element
  • Glossmeter
  • Online gloss measurement
  • Quality inspection
  • Specular gloss

Cite this

Kuivalainen, K., Oksman, A., Juuti, M., Myller, K., & Peiponen, K-E. (2010). Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications. Optical Review, 17(3), 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2
Kuivalainen, Kalle ; Oksman, Antti ; Juuti, Mikko ; Myller, Kari ; Peiponen, Kai-Erik. / Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications. In: Optical Review. 2010 ; Vol. 17, No. 3. pp. 248-251.
@article{2f3eca7e869940c180d18628fd7214ba,
title = "Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications",
abstract = "In this paper, we present three new types of diffractive-optical-element (DOE)-based glossmeters (DOGs) that have been developed for both laboratory and online local specular gloss measurements of objects in industrial processes. The three are denoted as the handheld wireless glossmeter, µDOG two-dimensional (2D) and µDOG one-dimensional (1D), respectively. These glossmeters are designed to operate under conditions where gloss measurement with conventional glossmeters is impossible or difficult, or when fine structures of the gloss over a surface are an issue. Here, we show the applicability of the handheld glossmeter and µDOG 2D in the inspection of gloss from rough stainless steel plates finished by different machining methods. We also briefly introduce the concept of online gauge µDOG 1D for gloss assessment in industrial measurement environments.",
keywords = "Diffractive optical element, Glossmeter, Online gloss measurement, Quality inspection, Specular gloss",
author = "Kalle Kuivalainen and Antti Oksman and Mikko Juuti and Kari Myller and Kai-Erik Peiponen",
year = "2010",
doi = "10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2",
language = "English",
volume = "17",
pages = "248--251",
journal = "Optical Review",
issn = "1340-6000",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "3",

}

Kuivalainen, K, Oksman, A, Juuti, M, Myller, K & Peiponen, K-E 2010, 'Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications', Optical Review, vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 248-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2

Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications. / Kuivalainen, Kalle; Oksman, Antti; Juuti, Mikko; Myller, Kari; Peiponen, Kai-Erik (Corresponding Author).

In: Optical Review, Vol. 17, No. 3, 2010, p. 248-251.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications

AU - Kuivalainen, Kalle

AU - Oksman, Antti

AU - Juuti, Mikko

AU - Myller, Kari

AU - Peiponen, Kai-Erik

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - In this paper, we present three new types of diffractive-optical-element (DOE)-based glossmeters (DOGs) that have been developed for both laboratory and online local specular gloss measurements of objects in industrial processes. The three are denoted as the handheld wireless glossmeter, µDOG two-dimensional (2D) and µDOG one-dimensional (1D), respectively. These glossmeters are designed to operate under conditions where gloss measurement with conventional glossmeters is impossible or difficult, or when fine structures of the gloss over a surface are an issue. Here, we show the applicability of the handheld glossmeter and µDOG 2D in the inspection of gloss from rough stainless steel plates finished by different machining methods. We also briefly introduce the concept of online gauge µDOG 1D for gloss assessment in industrial measurement environments.

AB - In this paper, we present three new types of diffractive-optical-element (DOE)-based glossmeters (DOGs) that have been developed for both laboratory and online local specular gloss measurements of objects in industrial processes. The three are denoted as the handheld wireless glossmeter, µDOG two-dimensional (2D) and µDOG one-dimensional (1D), respectively. These glossmeters are designed to operate under conditions where gloss measurement with conventional glossmeters is impossible or difficult, or when fine structures of the gloss over a surface are an issue. Here, we show the applicability of the handheld glossmeter and µDOG 2D in the inspection of gloss from rough stainless steel plates finished by different machining methods. We also briefly introduce the concept of online gauge µDOG 1D for gloss assessment in industrial measurement environments.

KW - Diffractive optical element

KW - Glossmeter

KW - Online gloss measurement

KW - Quality inspection

KW - Specular gloss

U2 - 10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2

DO - 10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2

M3 - Article

VL - 17

SP - 248

EP - 251

JO - Optical Review

JF - Optical Review

SN - 1340-6000

IS - 3

ER -

Kuivalainen K, Oksman A, Juuti M, Myller K, Peiponen K-E. Advanced glossmeters for industrial applications. Optical Review. 2010;17(3):248-251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10043-010-0043-2