Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges

Chih-Chieh Chen, Matti Lehtimäki, Klaus Willeke

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

31 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Air-purifying respirators must be certified following the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) filter test criteria (30 CFR 11).
The criteria specify a range for the mean particle size and the measure of spread permissible for the test aerosol. The authors' experiments have shown that aerosol penetration as a function of particle size differs considerably among certified respirators of the same type. Filtering facepieces (disposable respirators) and cartridges of the dust-mist, dust-mist-fume, and high-efficiency particulate air type were tested. The respirators were sealed to mannequins in a test chamber. The aerosol concentrations inside and outside the respirator were measured by an aerodynamic particle sizer and a laser aerosol spectrometer over a particle size range of 0.1 to 15 µm.
Five flow rates ranging from 5 to 100 L/min were used to study flow dependency. The aerosol penetration through the filters is presented as a function of particle size. Aerosol penetration and pressure drop are combined to express the performance of each filter in terms of “ quality factor.” Under the same test conditions, the quality factor of one respirator may be as much as 6.6 times more than that of another respirator of the same type.
The filter quality factor has a greater aerosol size dependency as airflow and aerosol size increase. In general, cartridges have a larger surface area than filtering facepieces but not necessarily lower filter penetration or higher filter quality.
An analysis of the data shows that the best dust-mist respirator tested may provide five times more protection than the worst dust-mist respirator tested when exposed to the aerosol size distribution specified by the NIOSH filter test criteria.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)566-574
JournalAmerican Industrial Hygiene Association Journal
Volume53
Issue number9
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1992
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Mechanical Ventilators
Aerosols
Dust
Particle Size
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.)
Respiratory Protective Devices
Manikins
Lasers
Air
Pressure

Cite this

Chen, Chih-Chieh ; Lehtimäki, Matti ; Willeke, Klaus. / Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges. In: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal. 1992 ; Vol. 53, No. 9. pp. 566-574.
@article{c86e828e50af47aea288f62297d71df7,
title = "Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges",
abstract = "Air-purifying respirators must be certified following the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) filter test criteria (30 CFR 11). The criteria specify a range for the mean particle size and the measure of spread permissible for the test aerosol. The authors' experiments have shown that aerosol penetration as a function of particle size differs considerably among certified respirators of the same type. Filtering facepieces (disposable respirators) and cartridges of the dust-mist, dust-mist-fume, and high-efficiency particulate air type were tested. The respirators were sealed to mannequins in a test chamber. The aerosol concentrations inside and outside the respirator were measured by an aerodynamic particle sizer and a laser aerosol spectrometer over a particle size range of 0.1 to 15 µm. Five flow rates ranging from 5 to 100 L/min were used to study flow dependency. The aerosol penetration through the filters is presented as a function of particle size. Aerosol penetration and pressure drop are combined to express the performance of each filter in terms of “ quality factor.” Under the same test conditions, the quality factor of one respirator may be as much as 6.6 times more than that of another respirator of the same type. The filter quality factor has a greater aerosol size dependency as airflow and aerosol size increase. In general, cartridges have a larger surface area than filtering facepieces but not necessarily lower filter penetration or higher filter quality. An analysis of the data shows that the best dust-mist respirator tested may provide five times more protection than the worst dust-mist respirator tested when exposed to the aerosol size distribution specified by the NIOSH filter test criteria.",
author = "Chih-Chieh Chen and Matti Lehtim{\"a}ki and Klaus Willeke",
year = "1992",
doi = "10.1080/15298669291360166",
language = "English",
volume = "53",
pages = "566--574",
journal = "Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene",
issn = "1545-9624",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "9",

}

Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges. / Chen, Chih-Chieh; Lehtimäki, Matti; Willeke, Klaus.

In: American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, Vol. 53, No. 9, 1992, p. 566-574.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aerosol penetration through filtering facepieces and respirator cartridges

AU - Chen, Chih-Chieh

AU - Lehtimäki, Matti

AU - Willeke, Klaus

PY - 1992

Y1 - 1992

N2 - Air-purifying respirators must be certified following the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) filter test criteria (30 CFR 11). The criteria specify a range for the mean particle size and the measure of spread permissible for the test aerosol. The authors' experiments have shown that aerosol penetration as a function of particle size differs considerably among certified respirators of the same type. Filtering facepieces (disposable respirators) and cartridges of the dust-mist, dust-mist-fume, and high-efficiency particulate air type were tested. The respirators were sealed to mannequins in a test chamber. The aerosol concentrations inside and outside the respirator were measured by an aerodynamic particle sizer and a laser aerosol spectrometer over a particle size range of 0.1 to 15 µm. Five flow rates ranging from 5 to 100 L/min were used to study flow dependency. The aerosol penetration through the filters is presented as a function of particle size. Aerosol penetration and pressure drop are combined to express the performance of each filter in terms of “ quality factor.” Under the same test conditions, the quality factor of one respirator may be as much as 6.6 times more than that of another respirator of the same type. The filter quality factor has a greater aerosol size dependency as airflow and aerosol size increase. In general, cartridges have a larger surface area than filtering facepieces but not necessarily lower filter penetration or higher filter quality. An analysis of the data shows that the best dust-mist respirator tested may provide five times more protection than the worst dust-mist respirator tested when exposed to the aerosol size distribution specified by the NIOSH filter test criteria.

AB - Air-purifying respirators must be certified following the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) filter test criteria (30 CFR 11). The criteria specify a range for the mean particle size and the measure of spread permissible for the test aerosol. The authors' experiments have shown that aerosol penetration as a function of particle size differs considerably among certified respirators of the same type. Filtering facepieces (disposable respirators) and cartridges of the dust-mist, dust-mist-fume, and high-efficiency particulate air type were tested. The respirators were sealed to mannequins in a test chamber. The aerosol concentrations inside and outside the respirator were measured by an aerodynamic particle sizer and a laser aerosol spectrometer over a particle size range of 0.1 to 15 µm. Five flow rates ranging from 5 to 100 L/min were used to study flow dependency. The aerosol penetration through the filters is presented as a function of particle size. Aerosol penetration and pressure drop are combined to express the performance of each filter in terms of “ quality factor.” Under the same test conditions, the quality factor of one respirator may be as much as 6.6 times more than that of another respirator of the same type. The filter quality factor has a greater aerosol size dependency as airflow and aerosol size increase. In general, cartridges have a larger surface area than filtering facepieces but not necessarily lower filter penetration or higher filter quality. An analysis of the data shows that the best dust-mist respirator tested may provide five times more protection than the worst dust-mist respirator tested when exposed to the aerosol size distribution specified by the NIOSH filter test criteria.

U2 - 10.1080/15298669291360166

DO - 10.1080/15298669291360166

M3 - Article

VL - 53

SP - 566

EP - 574

JO - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

JF - Journal of Occupational and Environmental Hygiene

SN - 1545-9624

IS - 9

ER -