An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas

J. G. Gallegos, R. Benyon, S. Avila, A. Benito, R. M. Gavioso, H. Mitter, S. Bell, M. Stevens, N. Böse, V. Ebert, M. Heinonen, H. Sairanen, A. Peruzzi, R. Bosma, M. Val'ková

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

8 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Moisture content is a key factor regardless of the activity carried out inside the natural gas industry (production, processing, transmission, etc.). Not only does the efficiency of the final product, known as heating value, decrease when the water content is high, but it can also trigger potentially dangerous conditions due to the formation of hydrates, that can block pipelines and damage pumping devices and produce other negative effects. For these reasons, accurate measurement and control of humidity is absolutely essential. However, current practice for such moisture measurements is for the devices to be calibrated at atmospheric pressure and in nitrogen or air as the matrix gas, conditions that vary significantly from those present in the actual industrial process. For that, eleven hygrometers based on different measurement principles (chilled-mirror, electrolytic sensor, a spectroscopic analyzer, polymeric and metal oxide humidity sensors) have been compared at facilities of the main carrier of natural gas in Spain, using natural gas at absolute pressures between 0.1MPa and 6MPa, and for a range of water content from 13ppmv to 250ppmv. Their relative performance is described in terms of the response times, long term stability, hysteresis and behaviour under large pressure changes. Most instruments, exceptions are detailed in the article, show good behaviour regarding response time, hysteresis and under sudden pressure changes. In contrast, drift can be identified in most of the aluminium oxide probes tested.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)407-416
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering
Volume23
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Mar 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Atmospheric humidity
Natural gas
Water content
Hysteresis
Moisture
Hygrometers
Humidity sensors
Oxides
Gas industry
Hydrates
Atmospheric pressure
Mirrors
Pipelines
Nitrogen
Aluminum
Heating
Sensors
Processing
Air
Metals

Keywords

  • Comparison
  • Dew point
  • Humidity
  • Hygrometer
  • Natural gas
  • Pressure

Cite this

Gallegos, J. G. ; Benyon, R. ; Avila, S. ; Benito, A. ; Gavioso, R. M. ; Mitter, H. ; Bell, S. ; Stevens, M. ; Böse, N. ; Ebert, V. ; Heinonen, M. ; Sairanen, H. ; Peruzzi, A. ; Bosma, R. ; Val'ková, M. / An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas. In: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. 2015 ; Vol. 23. pp. 407-416.
@article{a5ac246b10284c9a9b24d1e347d4ff29,
title = "An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas",
abstract = "Moisture content is a key factor regardless of the activity carried out inside the natural gas industry (production, processing, transmission, etc.). Not only does the efficiency of the final product, known as heating value, decrease when the water content is high, but it can also trigger potentially dangerous conditions due to the formation of hydrates, that can block pipelines and damage pumping devices and produce other negative effects. For these reasons, accurate measurement and control of humidity is absolutely essential. However, current practice for such moisture measurements is for the devices to be calibrated at atmospheric pressure and in nitrogen or air as the matrix gas, conditions that vary significantly from those present in the actual industrial process. For that, eleven hygrometers based on different measurement principles (chilled-mirror, electrolytic sensor, a spectroscopic analyzer, polymeric and metal oxide humidity sensors) have been compared at facilities of the main carrier of natural gas in Spain, using natural gas at absolute pressures between 0.1MPa and 6MPa, and for a range of water content from 13ppmv to 250ppmv. Their relative performance is described in terms of the response times, long term stability, hysteresis and behaviour under large pressure changes. Most instruments, exceptions are detailed in the article, show good behaviour regarding response time, hysteresis and under sudden pressure changes. In contrast, drift can be identified in most of the aluminium oxide probes tested.",
keywords = "Comparison, Dew point, Humidity, Hygrometer, Natural gas, Pressure",
author = "Gallegos, {J. G.} and R. Benyon and S. Avila and A. Benito and Gavioso, {R. M.} and H. Mitter and S. Bell and M. Stevens and N. B{\"o}se and V. Ebert and M. Heinonen and H. Sairanen and A. Peruzzi and R. Bosma and M. Val'kov{\'a}",
year = "2015",
month = "3",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.021",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "407--416",
journal = "Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering",
issn = "1875-5100",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Gallegos, JG, Benyon, R, Avila, S, Benito, A, Gavioso, RM, Mitter, H, Bell, S, Stevens, M, Böse, N, Ebert, V, Heinonen, M, Sairanen, H, Peruzzi, A, Bosma, R & Val'ková, M 2015, 'An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas', Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, vol. 23, pp. 407-416. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.021

An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas. / Gallegos, J. G.; Benyon, R.; Avila, S.; Benito, A.; Gavioso, R. M.; Mitter, H.; Bell, S.; Stevens, M.; Böse, N.; Ebert, V.; Heinonen, M.; Sairanen, H.; Peruzzi, A.; Bosma, R.; Val'ková, M.

In: Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, Vol. 23, 01.03.2015, p. 407-416.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - An investigation of the comparative performance of diverse humidity sensing techniques in natural gas

AU - Gallegos, J. G.

AU - Benyon, R.

AU - Avila, S.

AU - Benito, A.

AU - Gavioso, R. M.

AU - Mitter, H.

AU - Bell, S.

AU - Stevens, M.

AU - Böse, N.

AU - Ebert, V.

AU - Heinonen, M.

AU - Sairanen, H.

AU - Peruzzi, A.

AU - Bosma, R.

AU - Val'ková, M.

PY - 2015/3/1

Y1 - 2015/3/1

N2 - Moisture content is a key factor regardless of the activity carried out inside the natural gas industry (production, processing, transmission, etc.). Not only does the efficiency of the final product, known as heating value, decrease when the water content is high, but it can also trigger potentially dangerous conditions due to the formation of hydrates, that can block pipelines and damage pumping devices and produce other negative effects. For these reasons, accurate measurement and control of humidity is absolutely essential. However, current practice for such moisture measurements is for the devices to be calibrated at atmospheric pressure and in nitrogen or air as the matrix gas, conditions that vary significantly from those present in the actual industrial process. For that, eleven hygrometers based on different measurement principles (chilled-mirror, electrolytic sensor, a spectroscopic analyzer, polymeric and metal oxide humidity sensors) have been compared at facilities of the main carrier of natural gas in Spain, using natural gas at absolute pressures between 0.1MPa and 6MPa, and for a range of water content from 13ppmv to 250ppmv. Their relative performance is described in terms of the response times, long term stability, hysteresis and behaviour under large pressure changes. Most instruments, exceptions are detailed in the article, show good behaviour regarding response time, hysteresis and under sudden pressure changes. In contrast, drift can be identified in most of the aluminium oxide probes tested.

AB - Moisture content is a key factor regardless of the activity carried out inside the natural gas industry (production, processing, transmission, etc.). Not only does the efficiency of the final product, known as heating value, decrease when the water content is high, but it can also trigger potentially dangerous conditions due to the formation of hydrates, that can block pipelines and damage pumping devices and produce other negative effects. For these reasons, accurate measurement and control of humidity is absolutely essential. However, current practice for such moisture measurements is for the devices to be calibrated at atmospheric pressure and in nitrogen or air as the matrix gas, conditions that vary significantly from those present in the actual industrial process. For that, eleven hygrometers based on different measurement principles (chilled-mirror, electrolytic sensor, a spectroscopic analyzer, polymeric and metal oxide humidity sensors) have been compared at facilities of the main carrier of natural gas in Spain, using natural gas at absolute pressures between 0.1MPa and 6MPa, and for a range of water content from 13ppmv to 250ppmv. Their relative performance is described in terms of the response times, long term stability, hysteresis and behaviour under large pressure changes. Most instruments, exceptions are detailed in the article, show good behaviour regarding response time, hysteresis and under sudden pressure changes. In contrast, drift can be identified in most of the aluminium oxide probes tested.

KW - Comparison

KW - Dew point

KW - Humidity

KW - Hygrometer

KW - Natural gas

KW - Pressure

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84923070914&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.021

DO - 10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.021

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 407

EP - 416

JO - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

JF - Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

SN - 1875-5100

ER -