Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas

*Corresponding author for this work
    • National Institutes for Quantum and Radiological Science and Technology (QST)
    • Culham Science Centre
    • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (ORNL)
    • KTH Royal Institute of Technology
    • Commissariat a l'Energie Atomique et aux Energies Alternatives (CEA)
    • Eindhoven University of Technology (TU/e)
    • Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH (FZJ)
    • Institute for Plasma Research
    • Universidade de Lisboa
    • Queen's University Belfast
    • University of Helsinki
    • University of Naples Federico II
    • National University of Distance Education
    • National Research Council (CNR)
    • Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute
    • Parthenope University of Naples
    • National Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development (ENEA)
    • Troitsk Institute for Innovation and Fusion Research
    • Uppsala University
    • Aalto University
    • Seoul National University
    • Chalmers University of Technology
    • ITER Organization

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    The stability with respect to a peelingballooning mode (PBM) was investigated numerically with extended MHD simulation codes in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA plasmas. The MINERVA-DI code was used to analyze the linear stability, including the effects of rotation and ion diamagnetic drift (w∗i), in JET-ILW and JT-60SA plasmas, and the JOREK code was used to simulate nonlinear dynamics with rotation, viscosity and resistivity in JT-60U plasmas. It was validated quantitatively that the ELM trigger condition in JET-ILW plasmas can be reasonably explained by taking into account both the rotation and w∗i effects in the numerical analysis. When deuterium poloidal rotation is evaluated based on neoclassical theory, an increase in the effective charge of plasma destabilizes the PBM because of an acceleration of rotation and a decrease in w∗i. The difference in the amount of ELM energy loss in JT-60U plasmas rotating in opposite directions was reproduced qualitatively with JOREK. By comparing the ELM affected areas with linear eigenfunctions, it was confirmed that the difference in the linear stability property, due not to the rotation direction but to the plasma density profile, is thought to be responsible for changing the ELM energy loss just after the ELM crash. A predictive study to determine the pedestal profiles in JT-60SA was performed by updating the EPED1 model to include the rotation and w∗i effects in the PBM stability analysis. It was shown that the plasma rotation predicted with the neoclassical toroidal viscosity degrades the pedestal performance by about 10% by destabilizing the PBM, but the pressure pedestal height will be high enough to achieve the target parameters required for the ITER-like shape inductive scenario in JT-60SA.
    Original languageEnglish
    Article number014032
    JournalPlasma Physics and Controlled Fusion
    Volume60
    Issue number1
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2018
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed
    Event44th European Physical Society Conference on Plasma Physics - Belfast, United Kingdom
    Duration: 26 Jun 201730 Jun 2017

    Funding

    This work was partially supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K06656, and has been partly carried out within the framework of the EUROfusion Consortium and has received funding from the Euratom research and training programme 2014–2018 under grant agreement No 633053.

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy

    Keywords

    • ELM
    • extended MHD model
    • H-mode
    • rotation
    • tokamaks

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of ELM stability with extended MHD models in JET, JT-60U and future JT-60SA tokamak plasmas'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this