Analysis of the time-averaged gas-solid drag force based on data from transient 3D CFD simulations of fluidized beds

Sirpa Kallio (Corresponding Author), Juho Peltola, Timo Niemi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

In the present work, a qualitative analysis of the time-averaged gas–solid drag force in gas–solid fluidized beds is carried out. The analysis is based on a large number of transient Eulerian–Eulerian 3D CFD simulations of small bubbling, turbulent and circulating fluidized beds. The obtained results significantly differ from corresponding data previously obtained from 2D simulations, especially at high solid concentrations. This confirms that to accurately model the gas–solid drag force in a steady state 3D simulation, the drag model should not be based on data from transient 2D simulations. In the present work, the average drag force is expressed as the product of the drag force calculated from time-averaged velocities and volume fractions and a correction coefficient. The study shows that even when the third dimension is described in the mesh with only three nodes, the 3D character of the flow is captured in the drag correction coefficient. Thus, a large number of parametric studies could be carried out in a reasonable time frame. In the paper, the parameters affecting the time-averaged drag force are identified and the nature of the effects are analyzed. The analysis shows that solid volume fraction, particle size, solid density, gas viscosity, the slip velocity between gas and solids and the lateral distance to a wall have significant effects on the drag correction coefficient. At high gas densities typical e.g. of pressurized fluidization even the gas density has significant effects. A closure relation for the time-averaged drag force for a wide range of fluidization conditions should include these seven variables as inputs.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)227-238
JournalPowder Technology
Volume274
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2015
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Fluidized beds
Drag
Computational fluid dynamics
Gases
Density of gases
Fluidization
Volume fraction
Viscosity of gases
Particle size

Keywords

  • drag force
  • fluidized bed
  • time-averaged
  • 3D simulation

Cite this

@article{d8d51f255bbf4dd7a6b2ea1dd554c8b6,
title = "Analysis of the time-averaged gas-solid drag force based on data from transient 3D CFD simulations of fluidized beds",
abstract = "In the present work, a qualitative analysis of the time-averaged gas–solid drag force in gas–solid fluidized beds is carried out. The analysis is based on a large number of transient Eulerian–Eulerian 3D CFD simulations of small bubbling, turbulent and circulating fluidized beds. The obtained results significantly differ from corresponding data previously obtained from 2D simulations, especially at high solid concentrations. This confirms that to accurately model the gas–solid drag force in a steady state 3D simulation, the drag model should not be based on data from transient 2D simulations. In the present work, the average drag force is expressed as the product of the drag force calculated from time-averaged velocities and volume fractions and a correction coefficient. The study shows that even when the third dimension is described in the mesh with only three nodes, the 3D character of the flow is captured in the drag correction coefficient. Thus, a large number of parametric studies could be carried out in a reasonable time frame. In the paper, the parameters affecting the time-averaged drag force are identified and the nature of the effects are analyzed. The analysis shows that solid volume fraction, particle size, solid density, gas viscosity, the slip velocity between gas and solids and the lateral distance to a wall have significant effects on the drag correction coefficient. At high gas densities typical e.g. of pressurized fluidization even the gas density has significant effects. A closure relation for the time-averaged drag force for a wide range of fluidization conditions should include these seven variables as inputs.",
keywords = "drag force, fluidized bed, time-averaged, 3D simulation",
author = "Sirpa Kallio and Juho Peltola and Timo Niemi",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.029",
language = "English",
volume = "274",
pages = "227--238",
journal = "Powder Technology",
issn = "0032-5910",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of the time-averaged gas-solid drag force based on data from transient 3D CFD simulations of fluidized beds

AU - Kallio, Sirpa

AU - Peltola, Juho

AU - Niemi, Timo

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - In the present work, a qualitative analysis of the time-averaged gas–solid drag force in gas–solid fluidized beds is carried out. The analysis is based on a large number of transient Eulerian–Eulerian 3D CFD simulations of small bubbling, turbulent and circulating fluidized beds. The obtained results significantly differ from corresponding data previously obtained from 2D simulations, especially at high solid concentrations. This confirms that to accurately model the gas–solid drag force in a steady state 3D simulation, the drag model should not be based on data from transient 2D simulations. In the present work, the average drag force is expressed as the product of the drag force calculated from time-averaged velocities and volume fractions and a correction coefficient. The study shows that even when the third dimension is described in the mesh with only three nodes, the 3D character of the flow is captured in the drag correction coefficient. Thus, a large number of parametric studies could be carried out in a reasonable time frame. In the paper, the parameters affecting the time-averaged drag force are identified and the nature of the effects are analyzed. The analysis shows that solid volume fraction, particle size, solid density, gas viscosity, the slip velocity between gas and solids and the lateral distance to a wall have significant effects on the drag correction coefficient. At high gas densities typical e.g. of pressurized fluidization even the gas density has significant effects. A closure relation for the time-averaged drag force for a wide range of fluidization conditions should include these seven variables as inputs.

AB - In the present work, a qualitative analysis of the time-averaged gas–solid drag force in gas–solid fluidized beds is carried out. The analysis is based on a large number of transient Eulerian–Eulerian 3D CFD simulations of small bubbling, turbulent and circulating fluidized beds. The obtained results significantly differ from corresponding data previously obtained from 2D simulations, especially at high solid concentrations. This confirms that to accurately model the gas–solid drag force in a steady state 3D simulation, the drag model should not be based on data from transient 2D simulations. In the present work, the average drag force is expressed as the product of the drag force calculated from time-averaged velocities and volume fractions and a correction coefficient. The study shows that even when the third dimension is described in the mesh with only three nodes, the 3D character of the flow is captured in the drag correction coefficient. Thus, a large number of parametric studies could be carried out in a reasonable time frame. In the paper, the parameters affecting the time-averaged drag force are identified and the nature of the effects are analyzed. The analysis shows that solid volume fraction, particle size, solid density, gas viscosity, the slip velocity between gas and solids and the lateral distance to a wall have significant effects on the drag correction coefficient. At high gas densities typical e.g. of pressurized fluidization even the gas density has significant effects. A closure relation for the time-averaged drag force for a wide range of fluidization conditions should include these seven variables as inputs.

KW - drag force

KW - fluidized bed

KW - time-averaged

KW - 3D simulation

U2 - 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.powtec.2015.01.029

M3 - Article

VL - 274

SP - 227

EP - 238

JO - Powder Technology

JF - Powder Technology

SN - 0032-5910

ER -