Analysis of work practices from the resilience engineering perspective

Leena Norros (Corresponding Author)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

According to the main assumptions of the Resilience Engineering approach, one of the main challenges of safety management in organizations is to strike balance between pre-planned preparedness and situation-driven acting. In order to act in an adaptive way in unexpected situations, and to develop structures and processes, organizations need to create appropriate shared awareness of what they understand by system safety. Beyond this, there must be sufficient understanding of actual work practices and how they support system safety and resilience. An ecological analysis of practice for the facilitation of these aims will be proposed in the paper. It is also important for the control of safety that the used technologies and tools couple smoothly with human conduct. A concept of systems usability will be proposed as the quality criterion for evaluation of technologies. The evaluation exploits the analysis of performance outcome, practices and user experience and focuses on testing the tools' capability to facilitate resilience of the system. Demonstration of the use of the outlined analysis of practices and tools is based on own research in different safety critical complex work domains.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)325-335
JournalInternational Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation
Volume3
Issue number4
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Security systems
Demonstrations
Testing

Keywords

  • safety management
  • complex sociotechnical systems
  • interpretative practice
  • systems usability

Cite this

@article{81b0779ab89e497ba47a50a4e103f420,
title = "Analysis of work practices from the resilience engineering perspective",
abstract = "According to the main assumptions of the Resilience Engineering approach, one of the main challenges of safety management in organizations is to strike balance between pre-planned preparedness and situation-driven acting. In order to act in an adaptive way in unexpected situations, and to develop structures and processes, organizations need to create appropriate shared awareness of what they understand by system safety. Beyond this, there must be sufficient understanding of actual work practices and how they support system safety and resilience. An ecological analysis of practice for the facilitation of these aims will be proposed in the paper. It is also important for the control of safety that the used technologies and tools couple smoothly with human conduct. A concept of systems usability will be proposed as the quality criterion for evaluation of technologies. The evaluation exploits the analysis of performance outcome, practices and user experience and focuses on testing the tools' capability to facilitate resilience of the system. Demonstration of the use of the outlined analysis of practices and tools is based on own research in different safety critical complex work domains.",
keywords = "safety management, complex sociotechnical systems, interpretative practice, systems usability",
author = "Leena Norros",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
pages = "325--335",
journal = "International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation",
issn = "2185-3495",
number = "4",

}

Analysis of work practices from the resilience engineering perspective. / Norros, Leena (Corresponding Author).

In: International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation, Vol. 3, No. 4, 2012, p. 325-335.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Analysis of work practices from the resilience engineering perspective

AU - Norros, Leena

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - According to the main assumptions of the Resilience Engineering approach, one of the main challenges of safety management in organizations is to strike balance between pre-planned preparedness and situation-driven acting. In order to act in an adaptive way in unexpected situations, and to develop structures and processes, organizations need to create appropriate shared awareness of what they understand by system safety. Beyond this, there must be sufficient understanding of actual work practices and how they support system safety and resilience. An ecological analysis of practice for the facilitation of these aims will be proposed in the paper. It is also important for the control of safety that the used technologies and tools couple smoothly with human conduct. A concept of systems usability will be proposed as the quality criterion for evaluation of technologies. The evaluation exploits the analysis of performance outcome, practices and user experience and focuses on testing the tools' capability to facilitate resilience of the system. Demonstration of the use of the outlined analysis of practices and tools is based on own research in different safety critical complex work domains.

AB - According to the main assumptions of the Resilience Engineering approach, one of the main challenges of safety management in organizations is to strike balance between pre-planned preparedness and situation-driven acting. In order to act in an adaptive way in unexpected situations, and to develop structures and processes, organizations need to create appropriate shared awareness of what they understand by system safety. Beyond this, there must be sufficient understanding of actual work practices and how they support system safety and resilience. An ecological analysis of practice for the facilitation of these aims will be proposed in the paper. It is also important for the control of safety that the used technologies and tools couple smoothly with human conduct. A concept of systems usability will be proposed as the quality criterion for evaluation of technologies. The evaluation exploits the analysis of performance outcome, practices and user experience and focuses on testing the tools' capability to facilitate resilience of the system. Demonstration of the use of the outlined analysis of practices and tools is based on own research in different safety critical complex work domains.

KW - safety management

KW - complex sociotechnical systems

KW - interpretative practice

KW - systems usability

M3 - Article

VL - 3

SP - 325

EP - 335

JO - International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation

JF - International Journal of Nuclear Safety and Simulation

SN - 2185-3495

IS - 4

ER -