Anders Johan Lexell's role in the determination of the solar parallax

Johan Carl-Erik Stén, Per Pippin Aspaas

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Anders Johan Lexell (1740-1784) was a mathematician who gained considerable recognition for his scientific achievements during the century of Enlightenment. Born and educated in Åbo/Turku in the Finnish part of the Swedish Realm, he was invited as an assistant and collaborator of Leonhard Euler at the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg in 1768. After Euler's death in 1783 he inherited his mentor's chair and became professor of mathematics at the Petersburg Academy of Sciences, but survived only a year in this office. One of Lexell's first tasks in Saint Petersburg was to assist in the calculations involved in the Venus transit project of 1769. Under Euler's supervision, Lexell formulated a system of modeling equations involving the whole bulk of observation data obtained from all over the world. Thus, by searching (manually) the best estimate of the parallax with respect to all available measurements made of the Venus transit simultaneously, he anticipated later statistical modeling methods. The usual method at the time consisted of juxtaposing a pair of measurements at a time and taking a mean value of all the parallax values obtained in this way. What had started as an innocent, purely academic attempt to establish the solar parallax, soon escalated into a heated controversy of international dimensions. The roles played by Jérôme de Lalande in Paris and Maximilian Hell in Vienna in this controversy are well known; Lexell's role less so. Our analysis has two aims. First, we elucidate Lexell's place in the international solar parallax controversy by making use of his published works as well as surviving parts of his correspondence. Second, we present the method used by Lexell and analyze his way of calculating the solar parallax.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)71-82
JournalJournal of Astronomical Data
Volume19
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 2013
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Leonhard Euler
Venus
Modeling
Bulk
Mentor
Turku
Enlightenment
Mathematics
Collaborators
Equations
Mathematicians
Supervision

Cite this

Stén, Johan Carl-Erik ; Aspaas, Per Pippin. / Anders Johan Lexell's role in the determination of the solar parallax. In: Journal of Astronomical Data. 2013 ; Vol. 19, No. 1. pp. 71-82.
@article{67e49f4585994d38b0186d96d85c22bb,
title = "Anders Johan Lexell's role in the determination of the solar parallax",
abstract = "Anders Johan Lexell (1740-1784) was a mathematician who gained considerable recognition for his scientific achievements during the century of Enlightenment. Born and educated in {\AA}bo/Turku in the Finnish part of the Swedish Realm, he was invited as an assistant and collaborator of Leonhard Euler at the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg in 1768. After Euler's death in 1783 he inherited his mentor's chair and became professor of mathematics at the Petersburg Academy of Sciences, but survived only a year in this office. One of Lexell's first tasks in Saint Petersburg was to assist in the calculations involved in the Venus transit project of 1769. Under Euler's supervision, Lexell formulated a system of modeling equations involving the whole bulk of observation data obtained from all over the world. Thus, by searching (manually) the best estimate of the parallax with respect to all available measurements made of the Venus transit simultaneously, he anticipated later statistical modeling methods. The usual method at the time consisted of juxtaposing a pair of measurements at a time and taking a mean value of all the parallax values obtained in this way. What had started as an innocent, purely academic attempt to establish the solar parallax, soon escalated into a heated controversy of international dimensions. The roles played by J{\'e}r{\^o}me de Lalande in Paris and Maximilian Hell in Vienna in this controversy are well known; Lexell's role less so. Our analysis has two aims. First, we elucidate Lexell's place in the international solar parallax controversy by making use of his published works as well as surviving parts of his correspondence. Second, we present the method used by Lexell and analyze his way of calculating the solar parallax.",
author = "St{\'e}n, {Johan Carl-Erik} and Aspaas, {Per Pippin}",
year = "2013",
language = "English",
volume = "19",
pages = "71--82",
journal = "Journal of Astronomical Data",
issn = "1385-3945",
number = "1",

}

Anders Johan Lexell's role in the determination of the solar parallax. / Stén, Johan Carl-Erik; Aspaas, Per Pippin.

In: Journal of Astronomical Data, Vol. 19, No. 1, 2013, p. 71-82.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Anders Johan Lexell's role in the determination of the solar parallax

AU - Stén, Johan Carl-Erik

AU - Aspaas, Per Pippin

PY - 2013

Y1 - 2013

N2 - Anders Johan Lexell (1740-1784) was a mathematician who gained considerable recognition for his scientific achievements during the century of Enlightenment. Born and educated in Åbo/Turku in the Finnish part of the Swedish Realm, he was invited as an assistant and collaborator of Leonhard Euler at the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg in 1768. After Euler's death in 1783 he inherited his mentor's chair and became professor of mathematics at the Petersburg Academy of Sciences, but survived only a year in this office. One of Lexell's first tasks in Saint Petersburg was to assist in the calculations involved in the Venus transit project of 1769. Under Euler's supervision, Lexell formulated a system of modeling equations involving the whole bulk of observation data obtained from all over the world. Thus, by searching (manually) the best estimate of the parallax with respect to all available measurements made of the Venus transit simultaneously, he anticipated later statistical modeling methods. The usual method at the time consisted of juxtaposing a pair of measurements at a time and taking a mean value of all the parallax values obtained in this way. What had started as an innocent, purely academic attempt to establish the solar parallax, soon escalated into a heated controversy of international dimensions. The roles played by Jérôme de Lalande in Paris and Maximilian Hell in Vienna in this controversy are well known; Lexell's role less so. Our analysis has two aims. First, we elucidate Lexell's place in the international solar parallax controversy by making use of his published works as well as surviving parts of his correspondence. Second, we present the method used by Lexell and analyze his way of calculating the solar parallax.

AB - Anders Johan Lexell (1740-1784) was a mathematician who gained considerable recognition for his scientific achievements during the century of Enlightenment. Born and educated in Åbo/Turku in the Finnish part of the Swedish Realm, he was invited as an assistant and collaborator of Leonhard Euler at the Imperial Academy of Sciences in Saint Petersburg in 1768. After Euler's death in 1783 he inherited his mentor's chair and became professor of mathematics at the Petersburg Academy of Sciences, but survived only a year in this office. One of Lexell's first tasks in Saint Petersburg was to assist in the calculations involved in the Venus transit project of 1769. Under Euler's supervision, Lexell formulated a system of modeling equations involving the whole bulk of observation data obtained from all over the world. Thus, by searching (manually) the best estimate of the parallax with respect to all available measurements made of the Venus transit simultaneously, he anticipated later statistical modeling methods. The usual method at the time consisted of juxtaposing a pair of measurements at a time and taking a mean value of all the parallax values obtained in this way. What had started as an innocent, purely academic attempt to establish the solar parallax, soon escalated into a heated controversy of international dimensions. The roles played by Jérôme de Lalande in Paris and Maximilian Hell in Vienna in this controversy are well known; Lexell's role less so. Our analysis has two aims. First, we elucidate Lexell's place in the international solar parallax controversy by making use of his published works as well as surviving parts of his correspondence. Second, we present the method used by Lexell and analyze his way of calculating the solar parallax.

M3 - Article

VL - 19

SP - 71

EP - 82

JO - Journal of Astronomical Data

JF - Journal of Astronomical Data

SN - 1385-3945

IS - 1

ER -