Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings

I. Redsve, R. Kuisma, L. Laitala, E. Pesonen-Leinonen, Riitta Mahlberg, H.-R. Kymäläinen, M. Hautala, A.-M. Sjöberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

21 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

A new proposed standard, prEN 14565, describes a procedure for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings based upon synthetic thermoplastic polymers. In this study the procedure was applied for testing the soiling and cleanability of four commercial floor coverings (polyurethane-coated quartz vinyl and thermoplastic polyolefin tiles, vinyl flooring and linoleum) and for testing the cleaning efficiencies of two mop materials (micro fibre mop and yarn mop) with water and two commercial cleaning agents. A case study of the ability of one commercial maintenance agent to prevent soiling of an abraded linoleum floor covering was also carried out. Floor coverings were soiled in a soiling drum and cleaned with an Erichsen washability and scrub tester. The cleaning efficiency was measured with a colorimeter. Contact angle of water and surface energy determinations were compared in order to characterise the floor coverings. Polyurethane-coated polyolefin had the lowest soil residue after cleaning. The micro fibre mop was more effective than the yarn mop. In the case of linoleum floors, the effect of the maintenance agent on soil residue was negligible while positive effects on vacuuming were observed. According to the results, the soiling and cleaning method of this study can be used for comparing the soiling and cleanability of different floor coverings. By using this method, measurements are performed in a reproducible way and the cleaning properties of the materials can be compared with each other.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)346-352
Number of pages7
JournalTenside, Surfactants, Detergents
Volume40
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 2003
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

coverings
cleaning
Cleaning
Testing
yarns
Polyurethanes
Polyolefins
Thermoplastics
maintenance
Yarn
soils
brush (botany)
Colorimeters
Soils
Quartz
drums
fibers
Water
Fibers
tiles

Cite this

Redsve, I., Kuisma, R., Laitala, L., Pesonen-Leinonen, E., Mahlberg, R., Kymäläinen, H-R., ... Sjöberg, A-M. (2003). Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings. Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents, 40(6), 346-352.
Redsve, I. ; Kuisma, R. ; Laitala, L. ; Pesonen-Leinonen, E. ; Mahlberg, Riitta ; Kymäläinen, H.-R. ; Hautala, M. ; Sjöberg, A.-M. / Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings. In: Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents. 2003 ; Vol. 40, No. 6. pp. 346-352.
@article{310db6a097bf49aa9e74b235abeb18ae,
title = "Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings",
abstract = "A new proposed standard, prEN 14565, describes a procedure for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings based upon synthetic thermoplastic polymers. In this study the procedure was applied for testing the soiling and cleanability of four commercial floor coverings (polyurethane-coated quartz vinyl and thermoplastic polyolefin tiles, vinyl flooring and linoleum) and for testing the cleaning efficiencies of two mop materials (micro fibre mop and yarn mop) with water and two commercial cleaning agents. A case study of the ability of one commercial maintenance agent to prevent soiling of an abraded linoleum floor covering was also carried out. Floor coverings were soiled in a soiling drum and cleaned with an Erichsen washability and scrub tester. The cleaning efficiency was measured with a colorimeter. Contact angle of water and surface energy determinations were compared in order to characterise the floor coverings. Polyurethane-coated polyolefin had the lowest soil residue after cleaning. The micro fibre mop was more effective than the yarn mop. In the case of linoleum floors, the effect of the maintenance agent on soil residue was negligible while positive effects on vacuuming were observed. According to the results, the soiling and cleaning method of this study can be used for comparing the soiling and cleanability of different floor coverings. By using this method, measurements are performed in a reproducible way and the cleaning properties of the materials can be compared with each other.",
author = "I. Redsve and R. Kuisma and L. Laitala and E. Pesonen-Leinonen and Riitta Mahlberg and H.-R. Kym{\"a}l{\"a}inen and M. Hautala and A.-M. Sj{\"o}berg",
note = "Project code: R2SU00704",
year = "2003",
language = "English",
volume = "40",
pages = "346--352",
journal = "Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents",
issn = "0932-3414",
publisher = "Carl Hanser Verlag GmbH & Co. KG",
number = "6",

}

Redsve, I, Kuisma, R, Laitala, L, Pesonen-Leinonen, E, Mahlberg, R, Kymäläinen, H-R, Hautala, M & Sjöberg, A-M 2003, 'Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings', Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 346-352.

Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings. / Redsve, I.; Kuisma, R.; Laitala, L.; Pesonen-Leinonen, E.; Mahlberg, Riitta; Kymäläinen, H.-R.; Hautala, M.; Sjöberg, A.-M.

In: Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents, Vol. 40, No. 6, 2003, p. 346-352.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings

AU - Redsve, I.

AU - Kuisma, R.

AU - Laitala, L.

AU - Pesonen-Leinonen, E.

AU - Mahlberg, Riitta

AU - Kymäläinen, H.-R.

AU - Hautala, M.

AU - Sjöberg, A.-M.

N1 - Project code: R2SU00704

PY - 2003

Y1 - 2003

N2 - A new proposed standard, prEN 14565, describes a procedure for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings based upon synthetic thermoplastic polymers. In this study the procedure was applied for testing the soiling and cleanability of four commercial floor coverings (polyurethane-coated quartz vinyl and thermoplastic polyolefin tiles, vinyl flooring and linoleum) and for testing the cleaning efficiencies of two mop materials (micro fibre mop and yarn mop) with water and two commercial cleaning agents. A case study of the ability of one commercial maintenance agent to prevent soiling of an abraded linoleum floor covering was also carried out. Floor coverings were soiled in a soiling drum and cleaned with an Erichsen washability and scrub tester. The cleaning efficiency was measured with a colorimeter. Contact angle of water and surface energy determinations were compared in order to characterise the floor coverings. Polyurethane-coated polyolefin had the lowest soil residue after cleaning. The micro fibre mop was more effective than the yarn mop. In the case of linoleum floors, the effect of the maintenance agent on soil residue was negligible while positive effects on vacuuming were observed. According to the results, the soiling and cleaning method of this study can be used for comparing the soiling and cleanability of different floor coverings. By using this method, measurements are performed in a reproducible way and the cleaning properties of the materials can be compared with each other.

AB - A new proposed standard, prEN 14565, describes a procedure for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings based upon synthetic thermoplastic polymers. In this study the procedure was applied for testing the soiling and cleanability of four commercial floor coverings (polyurethane-coated quartz vinyl and thermoplastic polyolefin tiles, vinyl flooring and linoleum) and for testing the cleaning efficiencies of two mop materials (micro fibre mop and yarn mop) with water and two commercial cleaning agents. A case study of the ability of one commercial maintenance agent to prevent soiling of an abraded linoleum floor covering was also carried out. Floor coverings were soiled in a soiling drum and cleaned with an Erichsen washability and scrub tester. The cleaning efficiency was measured with a colorimeter. Contact angle of water and surface energy determinations were compared in order to characterise the floor coverings. Polyurethane-coated polyolefin had the lowest soil residue after cleaning. The micro fibre mop was more effective than the yarn mop. In the case of linoleum floors, the effect of the maintenance agent on soil residue was negligible while positive effects on vacuuming were observed. According to the results, the soiling and cleaning method of this study can be used for comparing the soiling and cleanability of different floor coverings. By using this method, measurements are performed in a reproducible way and the cleaning properties of the materials can be compared with each other.

M3 - Article

VL - 40

SP - 346

EP - 352

JO - Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents

JF - Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents

SN - 0932-3414

IS - 6

ER -

Redsve I, Kuisma R, Laitala L, Pesonen-Leinonen E, Mahlberg R, Kymäläinen H-R et al. Application of a proposed standard for testing soiling and cleanability of resilient floor coverings. Tenside, Surfactants, Detergents. 2003;40(6):346-352.