Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    We present an application of Systems Usability Case (SUC) as an overall human factors validation approach in a nuclear power plant control room modernization project. SUC enables a requirement-based human factors evaluation of complex technical systems that may cover the entire verification and validation process. The SUC is based on the Safety Case approach and on the Systems Usability construct. One of the main aims of establishing a Safety Case is to bring to the front the arguments and evidence for safety in such a way that the reasoning supports the work of a regulator or licensing organization. In the end, the SUC enables evaluating the Systems Usability of a system and making a reasonable solid argument about the acceptance of the system for use. The question is how the conclusions are reached through a reasoning process, in which the arguments are made about the evidence to approve or reject the claim concerning the quality of the system. The paper presents an application of the SUC to real data from an integrated system validation of the modernized main control room of Loviisa nuclear power plant. The results of the validation are discussed from the point of view of how the SUC approach enabled forming a statement about the acceptance of the control room. Moreover, some examples are given to demonstrate the learnings (e.g., strengths and weaknesses) as well as the development needs of the SUC approach.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publication11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies
    Subtitle of host publicationNPIC and HMIT 2019
    PublisherAmerican Nuclear Society ANS
    Pages488-498
    Number of pages11
    ISBN (Electronic)9780894487835
    Publication statusPublished - Feb 2019
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
    Event11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC and HMIT 2019 - Orlando, United States
    Duration: 9 Feb 201914 Feb 2019

    Conference

    Conference11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC and HMIT 2019
    Abbreviated titleNPIC and HMIT 2019
    CountryUnited States
    CityOrlando
    Period9/02/1914/02/19

    Fingerprint

    Human engineering
    Nuclear power plants
    Modernization

    Keywords

    • Control room
    • Human system interfaces
    • Integrated system validation
    • Usability
    • Verification and validation

    Cite this

    Koskinen, H., Laarni, J., Liinasuo, M., & Salo, L. (2019). Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room. In 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies: NPIC and HMIT 2019 (pp. 488-498). American Nuclear Society ANS.
    Koskinen, Hanna ; Laarni, Jari ; Liinasuo, Marja ; Salo, Leena. / Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room. 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies: NPIC and HMIT 2019. American Nuclear Society ANS, 2019. pp. 488-498
    @inproceedings{4371c5fcf30d4d7f82793224b3803798,
    title = "Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room",
    abstract = "We present an application of Systems Usability Case (SUC) as an overall human factors validation approach in a nuclear power plant control room modernization project. SUC enables a requirement-based human factors evaluation of complex technical systems that may cover the entire verification and validation process. The SUC is based on the Safety Case approach and on the Systems Usability construct. One of the main aims of establishing a Safety Case is to bring to the front the arguments and evidence for safety in such a way that the reasoning supports the work of a regulator or licensing organization. In the end, the SUC enables evaluating the Systems Usability of a system and making a reasonable solid argument about the acceptance of the system for use. The question is how the conclusions are reached through a reasoning process, in which the arguments are made about the evidence to approve or reject the claim concerning the quality of the system. The paper presents an application of the SUC to real data from an integrated system validation of the modernized main control room of Loviisa nuclear power plant. The results of the validation are discussed from the point of view of how the SUC approach enabled forming a statement about the acceptance of the control room. Moreover, some examples are given to demonstrate the learnings (e.g., strengths and weaknesses) as well as the development needs of the SUC approach.",
    keywords = "Control room, Human system interfaces, Integrated system validation, Usability, Verification and validation",
    author = "Hanna Koskinen and Jari Laarni and Marja Liinasuo and Leena Salo",
    year = "2019",
    month = "2",
    language = "English",
    pages = "488--498",
    booktitle = "11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies",
    publisher = "American Nuclear Society ANS",
    address = "United States",

    }

    Koskinen, H, Laarni, J, Liinasuo, M & Salo, L 2019, Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room. in 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies: NPIC and HMIT 2019. American Nuclear Society ANS, pp. 488-498, 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies, NPIC and HMIT 2019, Orlando, United States, 9/02/19.

    Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room. / Koskinen, Hanna; Laarni, Jari; Liinasuo, Marja; Salo, Leena.

    11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies: NPIC and HMIT 2019. American Nuclear Society ANS, 2019. p. 488-498.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room

    AU - Koskinen, Hanna

    AU - Laarni, Jari

    AU - Liinasuo, Marja

    AU - Salo, Leena

    PY - 2019/2

    Y1 - 2019/2

    N2 - We present an application of Systems Usability Case (SUC) as an overall human factors validation approach in a nuclear power plant control room modernization project. SUC enables a requirement-based human factors evaluation of complex technical systems that may cover the entire verification and validation process. The SUC is based on the Safety Case approach and on the Systems Usability construct. One of the main aims of establishing a Safety Case is to bring to the front the arguments and evidence for safety in such a way that the reasoning supports the work of a regulator or licensing organization. In the end, the SUC enables evaluating the Systems Usability of a system and making a reasonable solid argument about the acceptance of the system for use. The question is how the conclusions are reached through a reasoning process, in which the arguments are made about the evidence to approve or reject the claim concerning the quality of the system. The paper presents an application of the SUC to real data from an integrated system validation of the modernized main control room of Loviisa nuclear power plant. The results of the validation are discussed from the point of view of how the SUC approach enabled forming a statement about the acceptance of the control room. Moreover, some examples are given to demonstrate the learnings (e.g., strengths and weaknesses) as well as the development needs of the SUC approach.

    AB - We present an application of Systems Usability Case (SUC) as an overall human factors validation approach in a nuclear power plant control room modernization project. SUC enables a requirement-based human factors evaluation of complex technical systems that may cover the entire verification and validation process. The SUC is based on the Safety Case approach and on the Systems Usability construct. One of the main aims of establishing a Safety Case is to bring to the front the arguments and evidence for safety in such a way that the reasoning supports the work of a regulator or licensing organization. In the end, the SUC enables evaluating the Systems Usability of a system and making a reasonable solid argument about the acceptance of the system for use. The question is how the conclusions are reached through a reasoning process, in which the arguments are made about the evidence to approve or reject the claim concerning the quality of the system. The paper presents an application of the SUC to real data from an integrated system validation of the modernized main control room of Loviisa nuclear power plant. The results of the validation are discussed from the point of view of how the SUC approach enabled forming a statement about the acceptance of the control room. Moreover, some examples are given to demonstrate the learnings (e.g., strengths and weaknesses) as well as the development needs of the SUC approach.

    KW - Control room

    KW - Human system interfaces

    KW - Integrated system validation

    KW - Usability

    KW - Verification and validation

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85071013013&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    AN - SCOPUS:85071013013

    SP - 488

    EP - 498

    BT - 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies

    PB - American Nuclear Society ANS

    ER -

    Koskinen H, Laarni J, Liinasuo M, Salo L. Application of systems usability case in an integrated system validation of control room. In 11th Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technologies: NPIC and HMIT 2019. American Nuclear Society ANS. 2019. p. 488-498