Applications of probabilistic risk assessments: The selection of appropriate tools

Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer, Björn Wahlström

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

24 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an important methodology for assessing the risks of complex technologies. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of PRA. Its application is explored in three different settings: adversarial policy processes, regulatory/licensing procedures, and plant safety audits. It is concluded that PRA is a valuable tool for auditing safety precautions of existing or planned technologies, especially when it is carried out as an interactive process involving designers and plant personnel who are familiar with actual, everyday operations. PRA has not proven to be as well‐suited in providing absolute risk estimates in public‐policy debates concerning the acceptability of a technology, or for the licensing and regulatory procedures. The reasons for this are discussed.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)239 - 248
Number of pages10
JournalRisk Analysis
Volume11
Issue number2
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1991
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Risk assessment
Technology
Technology Transfer
Safety
Licensure
Personnel

Cite this

Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne ; Wahlström, Björn. / Applications of probabilistic risk assessments : The selection of appropriate tools. In: Risk Analysis. 1991 ; Vol. 11, No. 2. pp. 239 - 248.
@article{1fe298871d154136a5945babe9ae3c6b,
title = "Applications of probabilistic risk assessments: The selection of appropriate tools",
abstract = "Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an important methodology for assessing the risks of complex technologies. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of PRA. Its application is explored in three different settings: adversarial policy processes, regulatory/licensing procedures, and plant safety audits. It is concluded that PRA is a valuable tool for auditing safety precautions of existing or planned technologies, especially when it is carried out as an interactive process involving designers and plant personnel who are familiar with actual, everyday operations. PRA has not proven to be as well‐suited in providing absolute risk estimates in public‐policy debates concerning the acceptability of a technology, or for the licensing and regulatory procedures. The reasons for this are discussed.",
author = "Joanne Linnerooth-Bayer and Bj{\"o}rn Wahlstr{\"o}m",
year = "1991",
doi = "10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00600.x",
language = "English",
volume = "11",
pages = "239 -- 248",
journal = "Risk Analysis",
issn = "0272-4332",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "2",

}

Applications of probabilistic risk assessments : The selection of appropriate tools. / Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne; Wahlström, Björn.

In: Risk Analysis, Vol. 11, No. 2, 1991, p. 239 - 248.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applications of probabilistic risk assessments

T2 - The selection of appropriate tools

AU - Linnerooth-Bayer, Joanne

AU - Wahlström, Björn

PY - 1991

Y1 - 1991

N2 - Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an important methodology for assessing the risks of complex technologies. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of PRA. Its application is explored in three different settings: adversarial policy processes, regulatory/licensing procedures, and plant safety audits. It is concluded that PRA is a valuable tool for auditing safety precautions of existing or planned technologies, especially when it is carried out as an interactive process involving designers and plant personnel who are familiar with actual, everyday operations. PRA has not proven to be as well‐suited in providing absolute risk estimates in public‐policy debates concerning the acceptability of a technology, or for the licensing and regulatory procedures. The reasons for this are discussed.

AB - Probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) is an important methodology for assessing the risks of complex technologies. This paper discusses the strengths and weaknesses of PRA. Its application is explored in three different settings: adversarial policy processes, regulatory/licensing procedures, and plant safety audits. It is concluded that PRA is a valuable tool for auditing safety precautions of existing or planned technologies, especially when it is carried out as an interactive process involving designers and plant personnel who are familiar with actual, everyday operations. PRA has not proven to be as well‐suited in providing absolute risk estimates in public‐policy debates concerning the acceptability of a technology, or for the licensing and regulatory procedures. The reasons for this are discussed.

U2 - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00600.x

DO - 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1991.tb00600.x

M3 - Article

VL - 11

SP - 239

EP - 248

JO - Risk Analysis

JF - Risk Analysis

SN - 0272-4332

IS - 2

ER -