Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis

A. Turner, A. Burns, B. Colling, J. Leppänen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)315-320
    Number of pages6
    JournalFusion Science and Technology
    Volume74
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2018
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible

    Fingerprint

    Geometry
    blankets
    geometry
    requirements
    vessels
    Fusion reactions
    fusion
    Vacuum
    Heating
    licensing
    vacuum
    heating
    Tritium
    Deuterium
    Neutron sources
    neutron sources
    tritium
    flux (rate)
    figure of merit
    Shielding

    Keywords

    • ITER
    • Neutronics
    • Serpent

    Cite this

    Turner, A. ; Burns, A. ; Colling, B. ; Leppänen, J. / Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis. In: Fusion Science and Technology. 2018 ; Vol. 74, No. 4. pp. 315-320.
    @article{4ac86c83e005445185a05e846920703c,
    title = "Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis",
    abstract = "Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.",
    keywords = "ITER, Neutronics, Serpent",
    author = "A. Turner and A. Burns and B. Colling and J. Lepp{\"a}nen",
    year = "2018",
    month = "11",
    day = "17",
    doi = "10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660",
    language = "English",
    volume = "74",
    pages = "315--320",
    journal = "Fusion Science and Technology",
    issn = "1536-1055",
    publisher = "American Nuclear Society ANS",
    number = "4",

    }

    Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis. / Turner, A.; Burns, A.; Colling, B.; Leppänen, J.

    In: Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 74, No. 4, 17.11.2018, p. 315-320.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis

    AU - Turner, A.

    AU - Burns, A.

    AU - Colling, B.

    AU - Leppänen, J.

    PY - 2018/11/17

    Y1 - 2018/11/17

    N2 - Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

    AB - Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

    KW - ITER

    KW - Neutronics

    KW - Serpent

    UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053706076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

    U2 - 10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660

    DO - 10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660

    M3 - Article

    AN - SCOPUS:85053706076

    VL - 74

    SP - 315

    EP - 320

    JO - Fusion Science and Technology

    JF - Fusion Science and Technology

    SN - 1536-1055

    IS - 4

    ER -