Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis

A. Turner, A. Burns, B. Colling, J. Leppänen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)315-320
Number of pages6
JournalFusion Science and Technology
Volume74
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2018
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Geometry
blankets
geometry
requirements
vessels
Fusion reactions
fusion
Vacuum
Heating
licensing
vacuum
heating
Tritium
Deuterium
Neutron sources
neutron sources
tritium
flux (rate)
figure of merit
Shielding

Keywords

  • ITER
  • Neutronics
  • Serpent

Cite this

Turner, A. ; Burns, A. ; Colling, B. ; Leppänen, J. / Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis. In: Fusion Science and Technology. 2018 ; Vol. 74, No. 4. pp. 315-320.
@article{4ac86c83e005445185a05e846920703c,
title = "Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis",
abstract = "Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.",
keywords = "ITER, Neutronics, Serpent",
author = "A. Turner and A. Burns and B. Colling and J. Lepp{\"a}nen",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "17",
doi = "10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660",
language = "English",
volume = "74",
pages = "315--320",
journal = "Fusion Science and Technology",
issn = "1536-1055",
publisher = "American Nuclear Society ANS",
number = "4",

}

Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis. / Turner, A.; Burns, A.; Colling, B.; Leppänen, J.

In: Fusion Science and Technology, Vol. 74, No. 4, 17.11.2018, p. 315-320.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Applications of Serpent 2 Monte Carlo Code to ITER Neutronics Analysis

AU - Turner, A.

AU - Burns, A.

AU - Colling, B.

AU - Leppänen, J.

PY - 2018/11/17

Y1 - 2018/11/17

N2 - Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

AB - Nuclear analysis supporting the design and licensing of ITER is traditionally performed using MCNP and the reference model C-Model; however, the complexity of C-Model has resulted in the geometry creation and integration process becoming increasingly time-consuming. Serpent 2 is still a beta code; however, recent enhancements mean that it could, in principle, be applied to ITER neutronics analysis. Investigations have been undertaken into the effectiveness of Serpent for ITER neutronics analysis and whether this might offer an efficient modeling environment. An automated MCNP-to-Serpent model conversion tool was developed and successfully used to create a Serpent 2 variant of C-Model. A version of the deuterium-tritium plasma neutron source was also created. Standard reference tallies in C-Model for the blanket and vacuum vessel heating were implemented, and comparisons were made between the two transport codes assessing nuclear responses and computer requirements in the ITER model. Excellent agreement was found between the two codes when comparing neutron and photon flux and heating in the ITER blanket modules and vacuum vessel. Comparing tally figures of merit, computer requirements for Serpent were typically three to five times that of MCNP, and memory requirements were broadly similar. While Serpent was slower than MCNP when applied to fusion neutronics, future developments may improve this, and Serpent offers clear benefits that will reduce analyst time, including support for meshed geometry, robust universe implementation that avoids geometry errors at the boundaries, and mixed geometry types. Additional work is proceeding to compare Serpent against experiment benchmarks relevant for fusion shielding problems. While further developments are needed to improve variance reduction techniques and reduce simulation times, this paper demonstrates the suitability of Serpent to some aspects of ITER analysis.

KW - ITER

KW - Neutronics

KW - Serpent

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053706076&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660

DO - 10.1080/15361055.2018.1489660

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85053706076

VL - 74

SP - 315

EP - 320

JO - Fusion Science and Technology

JF - Fusion Science and Technology

SN - 1536-1055

IS - 4

ER -