Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of PICMET 2013 |
| Subtitle of host publication | Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology |
| Publisher | Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers IEEE |
| Pages | 1258-1267 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-1-4799-1149-3 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-8908-4327-4 |
| Publication status | Published - 2013 |
| MoE publication type | Not Eligible |
| Event | Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET 2013: Technology Management in the IT-Driven Services - San Jose Marriott Hotel, San Jose, United States Duration: 28 Jul 2013 → 1 Aug 2013 |
Conference
| Conference | Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology, PICMET 2013 |
|---|---|
| Abbreviated title | PICMET '13 |
| Country | United States |
| City | San Jose |
| Period | 28/07/13 → 1/08/13 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Are applied science threads more monopolistic? / Carley, S; Suominen, Arho; Boyack, K; Porter, A L.
Proceedings of PICMET 2013: Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering & Technology . Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers IEEE, 2013. p. 1258-1267.Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Conference article in proceedings › Scientific › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - Are applied science threads more monopolistic?
AU - Carley, S
AU - Suominen, Arho
AU - Boyack, K
AU - Porter, A L
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - We analyze if we can identify applied research through it being more monopolistic than basic research. Focusing on micro-communities within a case technology, the dye-sensitized solar cell, we seek to identify market structures within these communities that correlate with how basic or applied their science is. Combining economic measures of competitiveness with a ranking scheme provided by the National Science Foundation we show that more competitive market structures are more basic - attracting more citations, whereas, more applied R&D tends to be more localized in fewer organizations, presumably with different motivations. These results are useful as we try to identify how a technology emerges to being a commercially viable technology. Although there has been an active discussion if the linear model of technological development holds true - to an extent, we would presume some that there should be applied research prior to commercial application. Identifying the structure of this research enables a more holistic portrait of the landscape of a technology
AB - We analyze if we can identify applied research through it being more monopolistic than basic research. Focusing on micro-communities within a case technology, the dye-sensitized solar cell, we seek to identify market structures within these communities that correlate with how basic or applied their science is. Combining economic measures of competitiveness with a ranking scheme provided by the National Science Foundation we show that more competitive market structures are more basic - attracting more citations, whereas, more applied R&D tends to be more localized in fewer organizations, presumably with different motivations. These results are useful as we try to identify how a technology emerges to being a commercially viable technology. Although there has been an active discussion if the linear model of technological development holds true - to an extent, we would presume some that there should be applied research prior to commercial application. Identifying the structure of this research enables a more holistic portrait of the landscape of a technology
M3 - Conference article in proceedings
SN - 978-1-8908-4327-4
SP - 1258
EP - 1267
BT - Proceedings of PICMET 2013
PB - Institute of Electrical and Electronic Engineers IEEE
ER -