Are collaborative robots safe?

Timo Malm, Timo Salmi, Ilari Marstio, Iina Aaltonen

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsProfessional

    543 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Collaborative robots (cobots) market is supposed to increase rapidly. Although cobots are safer than their ancestors, industrial robots, there are some safety issues. The risk assessment for cobots is difficult since the cobots are working beside humans. In most of the applications the cobots can be safe. Sharp tools or objects and risk of impact to head are excluded from the common applications due to their risks. The common idea is to apply power and force limitation to ensure safe performance of cobots. The speed of the robot has huge effect on the impact force. Speed reduction with adequate safety controls can decrease the impact force to acceptable level in most of the applications. If there are severe risks in the robot cell, then it is possible to apply adequate separation distance between human and robot or safety-rated monitored stop to ensure safety and relatively close vicinity between human and the robot. One issue is that the stopping performance is complex and currently it is difficult to predict. Quite often, the validation requires impact force/pressure measurements or impact modelling.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationAutomaatiopäivät 23
    PublisherSuomen automaatioseura
    Pages110-117
    Number of pages8
    ISBN (Print)13 978–952-5183-54-2
    Publication statusPublished - 2019
    MoE publication typeD3 Professional conference proceedings
    EventAutomaatiopäivät23 - Oulu, Finland
    Duration: 15 May 201916 May 2019

    Seminar

    SeminarAutomaatiopäivät23
    Country/TerritoryFinland
    CityOulu
    Period15/05/1916/05/19

    Keywords

    • functional safety
    • collaborative robots
    • safety requirements
    • levels of collaboration

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Are collaborative robots safe?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this