TY - JOUR
T1 - Ash behavior during hydrothermal treatment for solid fuel applications. Part 1
T2 - Overview of different feedstock
AU - Mäkelä, Mikko
AU - Fullana, Andrés
AU - Yoshikawa, Kunio
N1 - Funding Information:
The contribution of Prof. Paul Geladi from the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences in proof reading this work is greatly appreciated. The Finnish Foundation for Technology Promotion mainly funded this work as a Postdoctoral Fellowship through the Foundations’ Post Doc pool.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2016 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2016
Y1 - 2016
N2 - Differences in ash behavior during hydrothermal treatment were identified based on multivariate data analysis of literature information on 29 different feedstock. In addition, the solubility of individual elements was evaluated based on a smaller data set. As a result two different groups were distinguished based on char ash content and ash yield. Virgin terrestrial and aquatic biomass, such as different types of wood and algae, in addition to herbaceous and agricultural biomass, bark, brewer's spent grain, compost and faecal waste showed lower char ash content than municipal solid wastes, anaerobic digestion residues and municipal and industrial sludge. Lower char ash content also correlated with lower ash yield indicating differences in chemical composition and ash solubility. Further evaluation of available data showed that ash in industrial sludge mainly contained anthropogenic Al, Fe and P or Ca and Si with low solubility during hydrothermal treatment. Char from corn stover, miscanthus, switch grass, rice hulls, olive, artichoke and orange wastes and empty fruit bunch had generally higher contents of K, Mg, S and Si than industrial sludge although differences existed within the group. In the future information on ash behavior should be used for enhancing the fuel properties of char based on feedstock type and hydrothermal treatment conditions.
AB - Differences in ash behavior during hydrothermal treatment were identified based on multivariate data analysis of literature information on 29 different feedstock. In addition, the solubility of individual elements was evaluated based on a smaller data set. As a result two different groups were distinguished based on char ash content and ash yield. Virgin terrestrial and aquatic biomass, such as different types of wood and algae, in addition to herbaceous and agricultural biomass, bark, brewer's spent grain, compost and faecal waste showed lower char ash content than municipal solid wastes, anaerobic digestion residues and municipal and industrial sludge. Lower char ash content also correlated with lower ash yield indicating differences in chemical composition and ash solubility. Further evaluation of available data showed that ash in industrial sludge mainly contained anthropogenic Al, Fe and P or Ca and Si with low solubility during hydrothermal treatment. Char from corn stover, miscanthus, switch grass, rice hulls, olive, artichoke and orange wastes and empty fruit bunch had generally higher contents of K, Mg, S and Si than industrial sludge although differences existed within the group. In the future information on ash behavior should be used for enhancing the fuel properties of char based on feedstock type and hydrothermal treatment conditions.
KW - Biomass
KW - Char
KW - Hydrothermal carbonization
KW - Principal component analysis
KW - Waste
KW - Wet torrefaction
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84966694991&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.016
DO - 10.1016/j.enconman.2016.05.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84966694991
SN - 0196-8904
VL - 121
SP - 402
EP - 408
JO - Energy Conversion and Management
JF - Energy Conversion and Management
ER -