Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to clarify the application of a
land-use baseline in attributional life cycle assessment
(ALCA) for product systems involving land use, through
consideration of the fundamental purpose of ALCA.
Currently, there is no clear view in the literature
whether a baseline should be used when accounting for
environmentally relevant physical flows related to land
use. Methods: An extensive search of literature was
carried out using the key terms 'attributional life cycle
assessment' and 'attributional LCA' in the Google Scholar
web search engine. Approximately 700 publications were
reviewed and summarised according to their type and
scope, relevance of land use, key statements and
references given for ALCA, and arguments for and against
using a baseline in ALCA. Based on the literature review
and supplementary literature references, a critical
discussion on the use of a baseline and determination of
the most appropriate land-use baseline in ALCA is
provided. Results and discussion: A few studies clearly
argued that only absolute (observable) flows without a
baseline are to be inventoried in ALCA, while the
majority of the studies did not make any clear statement
for or against. On the other hand, a land-use baseline
was explicitly applied or proposed in a minority of the
studies only, despite the fact that we classified land
use as highly relevant for the majority of the studies
reviewed. Furthermore, the LCA guidelines reviewed give
contradictory recommendations. The most cited studies for
the definition of ALCA provide general rules for
selecting processes based on observable flows but do not
argue that observable flows necessarily describe the
environmentally relevant physical flows. Conclusions: We
conclude that a baseline is required to separate the
studied parts of the technosphere from natural processes
and to describe the impact of land use on ecosystem
quality, such as carbon sequestration and biodiversity.
The most coherent baseline for human-induced land-use in
ALCA is natural regeneration. As the natural-regeneration
baseline has typically been excluded, may vary
bio-geographically and temporally, and is subject to
uncertainties, case studies applying it should be
performed so that implications can be studied and
evaluated. This is particularly important for
agricultural and forestry systems, such as food, feed,
fibre, timber and biofuels.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1364-1375 |
Journal | International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment |
Volume | 20 |
Issue number | 10 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Keywords
- absolute emission
- attributional LCA
- baseline
- environmentally relevant physical flow
- land use
- natural regeneration