Bacterial degradation of styrene in waste gases using a peat filter

Mona Arnold (Corresponding Author), A. Reittu, Atte von Wright, P. Martikainen, Maija-Liisa Suihko

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    96 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    A biofiltration process was developed for styrene-containing off-gases using peat as filter material. The average styrene reduction ratio after 190 days of operation was 70% (max. 98%) and the mean styrene elimination capacity was 12 g m−3 h−1 (max. 30 g m−3 h−1). Efficient styrene degradation required addition of nutrients to the peat, adjustment of the pH to a neutral level and efficient control of the humidity. Maintenance of the water balance was easier in a down-flow than in an up-flow process, the former consequently resulting in much better filtration efficiency. The optimum operation temperature was around 23 °C, but the styrene removal was still satisfactory at 12 °C. Seven different bacterial isolates belonging to the genera Tsukamurella, Pseudomonas, Sphingomonas, Xanthomonas and an unidentified genus in the γ group of the Proteobacteria isolated from the microflora of active peat filter material were capable of styrene degradation. The isolates differed in their capacity to decompose styrene to carbon dioxide and assimilate it to biomass. No toxic intermediate degradation products of styrene were detected in the filter outlet gas or in growing cultures of isolated bacteria. The use of these isolates in industrial biofilters is beneficial at low styrene concentrations and is safe from both the environmental and public health points of view.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)738 - 744
    Number of pages7
    JournalApplied Microbiology and Biotechnology
    Volume48
    Issue number6
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 1997
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bacterial degradation of styrene in waste gases using a peat filter'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this