Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Baseline Assessment of ESCALATE Zero-Emission Long-Haul Truck Demonstrations Regarding Total Cost of Ownership †

*Corresponding author for this work
  • Tampere University
  • Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
  • University of Surrey
  • Sisuauto Oy
  • Kuljetus ja muutto O. Jylhä Oy
  • Oy M. Rauanheimo Ab
  • BMC Otomotiv Sanayi ve Ticaret A.Ş.
  • Scientific and Technological Research Council of Turkey (TÜBITAK)
  • DHL Lojistik Hizmetleri A.Ş.
  • Electra Commercial Vehicles Ltd
  • Ford Otomotiv Sanayi A.Ş
  • Primafrio Corporacion S.A.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

The baseline assessment analysis for total cost of ownership of the pilot demonstrations of the ESCALATE project was carried out for four different powertrain configurations, dealing with modular and scalable powertrains for various vehicle configurations in long-haul trucking. The baseline TCO methodology and results for battery electric trucks (BETs), fuel cell electric trucks (FCETs) and FC range-extending BETs are analysed based on the final designs of the demonstrator vehicles and their foreseen pilot use cases and operational scenarios. As real operation data is not yet available, the analysis relies on energy use and pilot mission analysis through simulation. Overall, the TCO analysis shows several key factors affecting the relative competitiveness of the different zero-emission powertrains and vehicles. Long-haul operations pose clear challenges to vehicle design and long-range vehicles on single charge or refill show increased curb weight, limiting allowable payload due to GVW limits. The best payload capacity is shown for opportunity charging BETs and FCETs. BETs are generally the closest competitor to conventional trucks, but a key factor is the relative energy price difference between diesel, electricity (private or public) and hydrogen. Energy sourcing will be an important factor for end users to enable competitive shift to zero-emission options. Access to cheap private electricity or local green hydrogen may facilitate a choice between the options.

Original languageEnglish
Article number309
JournalWorld Electric Vehicle Journal
Volume17
Issue number6
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2026
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Funding

The work was funded through the Horizon Europe project ESCALATE, grant agreement No 101096598. M.P., M.R., P.R, and J.A. were also partially supported by the European Union NextGenerationEU project RePowerEU which was part of the strategic research initiative “Electric Storage” of VTT, launched with the support of the additional chapter of the RePowerEU investment and reform programme for sustainable growth in Finland, as well as Finnish Transportation Agency Traficom’s project “Sustainable Industry X—Heavy On-Road Vehicles Ecosystem (SIX HOVE)”, TRAFICOM/476892/05.03.179/2022.

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Keywords

  • electric vehicles
  • fast and megawatt charging infrastructure
  • fuel cell electric vehicles
  • heavy duty electric vehicles and buses
  • long-haul trucking
  • modelling and simulation
  • modular powertrain
  • payload capacity constraints
  • total cost of ownership

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Baseline Assessment of ESCALATE Zero-Emission Long-Haul Truck Demonstrations Regarding Total Cost of Ownership †'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this