Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2

G. Cojazzi (Corresponding Author), D. Fogli, G. Grassini, P. De Gelder, D. Gryffroy, R. Bolado, E. Hofer, R. Virolainen, I. M. Coe, A. Bassanelli, J. Puga, I. Papazoglou, O. Zuchuat, E. Cazzoli, J. Eyink, G. Guida, L. Pinola, U. Pulkkinen, K. Simola, D. Von Winterfeldt & 1 others A. Valeri

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

4 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

This article summarizes objectives and aims of the concerted action 'Benchmark Exercise on Expert Judgment Techniques in PSA Level 2' and the results obtained within the project. The project was organized in three phases, namely a survey phase (pre-phase), a first phase devoted to parameter estimation assessment and a second phase devoted to benchmarking expert judgment methods on a scenario development case. The paper is focused on the first phase and on the results obtained by the application of five structured Expert Judgment (EJ) methodologies to the problem at hand. The results of the comparison of EJ methodologies are also provided; they are based on the use of some metrics suitably designed during the project. The context of Phase 2 and the issue to be tackled in this phase are briefly described; since this phase has been carried out only at a preliminary level (mainly after the end of the project), the results obtained are not reported here in detail but are only briefly commented on.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)211-221
Number of pages11
JournalNuclear Engineering and Design
Volume209
Issue number1-3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Nov 2001
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

physical exercise
Benchmarking
Parameter estimation
methodology
benchmarking
project

Cite this

Cojazzi, G., Fogli, D., Grassini, G., De Gelder, P., Gryffroy, D., Bolado, R., ... Valeri, A. (2001). Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 209(1-3), 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6
Cojazzi, G. ; Fogli, D. ; Grassini, G. ; De Gelder, P. ; Gryffroy, D. ; Bolado, R. ; Hofer, E. ; Virolainen, R. ; Coe, I. M. ; Bassanelli, A. ; Puga, J. ; Papazoglou, I. ; Zuchuat, O. ; Cazzoli, E. ; Eyink, J. ; Guida, G. ; Pinola, L. ; Pulkkinen, U. ; Simola, K. ; Von Winterfeldt, D. ; Valeri, A. / Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2. In: Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2001 ; Vol. 209, No. 1-3. pp. 211-221.
@article{ecfe90a47e4e47fd95b6457f98375735,
title = "Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2",
abstract = "This article summarizes objectives and aims of the concerted action 'Benchmark Exercise on Expert Judgment Techniques in PSA Level 2' and the results obtained within the project. The project was organized in three phases, namely a survey phase (pre-phase), a first phase devoted to parameter estimation assessment and a second phase devoted to benchmarking expert judgment methods on a scenario development case. The paper is focused on the first phase and on the results obtained by the application of five structured Expert Judgment (EJ) methodologies to the problem at hand. The results of the comparison of EJ methodologies are also provided; they are based on the use of some metrics suitably designed during the project. The context of Phase 2 and the issue to be tackled in this phase are briefly described; since this phase has been carried out only at a preliminary level (mainly after the end of the project), the results obtained are not reported here in detail but are only briefly commented on.",
author = "G. Cojazzi and D. Fogli and G. Grassini and {De Gelder}, P. and D. Gryffroy and R. Bolado and E. Hofer and R. Virolainen and Coe, {I. M.} and A. Bassanelli and J. Puga and I. Papazoglou and O. Zuchuat and E. Cazzoli and J. Eyink and G. Guida and L. Pinola and U. Pulkkinen and K. Simola and {Von Winterfeldt}, D. and A. Valeri",
year = "2001",
month = "11",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6",
language = "English",
volume = "209",
pages = "211--221",
journal = "Nuclear Engineering and Design",
issn = "0029-5493",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "1-3",

}

Cojazzi, G, Fogli, D, Grassini, G, De Gelder, P, Gryffroy, D, Bolado, R, Hofer, E, Virolainen, R, Coe, IM, Bassanelli, A, Puga, J, Papazoglou, I, Zuchuat, O, Cazzoli, E, Eyink, J, Guida, G, Pinola, L, Pulkkinen, U, Simola, K, Von Winterfeldt, D & Valeri, A 2001, 'Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2', Nuclear Engineering and Design, vol. 209, no. 1-3, pp. 211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6

Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2. / Cojazzi, G. (Corresponding Author); Fogli, D.; Grassini, G.; De Gelder, P.; Gryffroy, D.; Bolado, R.; Hofer, E.; Virolainen, R.; Coe, I. M.; Bassanelli, A.; Puga, J.; Papazoglou, I.; Zuchuat, O.; Cazzoli, E.; Eyink, J.; Guida, G.; Pinola, L.; Pulkkinen, U.; Simola, K.; Von Winterfeldt, D.; Valeri, A.

In: Nuclear Engineering and Design, Vol. 209, No. 1-3, 01.11.2001, p. 211-221.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2

AU - Cojazzi, G.

AU - Fogli, D.

AU - Grassini, G.

AU - De Gelder, P.

AU - Gryffroy, D.

AU - Bolado, R.

AU - Hofer, E.

AU - Virolainen, R.

AU - Coe, I. M.

AU - Bassanelli, A.

AU - Puga, J.

AU - Papazoglou, I.

AU - Zuchuat, O.

AU - Cazzoli, E.

AU - Eyink, J.

AU - Guida, G.

AU - Pinola, L.

AU - Pulkkinen, U.

AU - Simola, K.

AU - Von Winterfeldt, D.

AU - Valeri, A.

PY - 2001/11/1

Y1 - 2001/11/1

N2 - This article summarizes objectives and aims of the concerted action 'Benchmark Exercise on Expert Judgment Techniques in PSA Level 2' and the results obtained within the project. The project was organized in three phases, namely a survey phase (pre-phase), a first phase devoted to parameter estimation assessment and a second phase devoted to benchmarking expert judgment methods on a scenario development case. The paper is focused on the first phase and on the results obtained by the application of five structured Expert Judgment (EJ) methodologies to the problem at hand. The results of the comparison of EJ methodologies are also provided; they are based on the use of some metrics suitably designed during the project. The context of Phase 2 and the issue to be tackled in this phase are briefly described; since this phase has been carried out only at a preliminary level (mainly after the end of the project), the results obtained are not reported here in detail but are only briefly commented on.

AB - This article summarizes objectives and aims of the concerted action 'Benchmark Exercise on Expert Judgment Techniques in PSA Level 2' and the results obtained within the project. The project was organized in three phases, namely a survey phase (pre-phase), a first phase devoted to parameter estimation assessment and a second phase devoted to benchmarking expert judgment methods on a scenario development case. The paper is focused on the first phase and on the results obtained by the application of five structured Expert Judgment (EJ) methodologies to the problem at hand. The results of the comparison of EJ methodologies are also provided; they are based on the use of some metrics suitably designed during the project. The context of Phase 2 and the issue to be tackled in this phase are briefly described; since this phase has been carried out only at a preliminary level (mainly after the end of the project), the results obtained are not reported here in detail but are only briefly commented on.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0035499069&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6

DO - 10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6

M3 - Article

VL - 209

SP - 211

EP - 221

JO - Nuclear Engineering and Design

JF - Nuclear Engineering and Design

SN - 0029-5493

IS - 1-3

ER -

Cojazzi G, Fogli D, Grassini G, De Gelder P, Gryffroy D, Bolado R et al. Benchmark exercise on expert judgment techniques in PSA Level 2. Nuclear Engineering and Design. 2001 Nov 1;209(1-3):211-221. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0029-5493(01)00404-6