Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 1-14 |
| Journal | Technologies |
| Volume | 5 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Fingerprint
Keywords
- artificial intelligence (AI)
- Asilomar AI principles
- framing
- intelligence
- multi-intelligence (MI) hybrid beings and systems
- post-anthropocentric
Cite this
}
Beyond AI : Multi-intelligence (MI) combining natural and artificial intelligences in hybrid beings and systems. / Fox, Stephen (Corresponding Author).
In: Technologies, Vol. 5, No. 3, 2017, p. 1-14.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review
TY - JOUR
T1 - Beyond AI
T2 - Multi-intelligence (MI) combining natural and artificial intelligences in hybrid beings and systems
AU - Fox, Stephen
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Framing strongly influences actions among technology proponents and end-users. Underlying much debate about artificial intelligence (AI) are several fundamental shortcomings in its framing. First, discussion of AI is atheoretical, and therefore has limited potential for addressing the complexity of causation. Second, intelligence is considered from an anthropocentric perspective that sees human intelligence, and intelligence developed by humans, as superior to all other intelligences. Thus, the extensive post-anthropocentric research into intelligence is not given sufficient consideration. Third, AI is discussed often in reductionist mechanistic terms. Rather than in organicist emergentist terms as a contributor to multi-intelligence (MI) hybrid beings and/or systems. Thus, current framing of AI can be a self-validating reduction within which AI development is focused upon AI becoming the single-variable mechanism causing future effects. In this paper, AI is reframed as a contributor to MI.
AB - Framing strongly influences actions among technology proponents and end-users. Underlying much debate about artificial intelligence (AI) are several fundamental shortcomings in its framing. First, discussion of AI is atheoretical, and therefore has limited potential for addressing the complexity of causation. Second, intelligence is considered from an anthropocentric perspective that sees human intelligence, and intelligence developed by humans, as superior to all other intelligences. Thus, the extensive post-anthropocentric research into intelligence is not given sufficient consideration. Third, AI is discussed often in reductionist mechanistic terms. Rather than in organicist emergentist terms as a contributor to multi-intelligence (MI) hybrid beings and/or systems. Thus, current framing of AI can be a self-validating reduction within which AI development is focused upon AI becoming the single-variable mechanism causing future effects. In this paper, AI is reframed as a contributor to MI.
KW - artificial intelligence (AI)
KW - Asilomar AI principles
KW - framing
KW - intelligence
KW - multi-intelligence (MI) hybrid beings and systems
KW - post-anthropocentric
U2 - 10.3390/technologies5030038
DO - 10.3390/technologies5030038
M3 - Article
VL - 5
SP - 1
EP - 14
JO - Technologies
JF - Technologies
SN - 2227-7080
IS - 3
ER -