Biodegradation potential of some barrier-coated boards in different soil environments

M.M. Nazhad (Corresponding Author), W. Sridach, Elias Retulainen, J. Kuusipalo, P. Parkpian

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

7 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Three pilot barrier‐coated boards that were recently produced at the Tampere University of Technology were tested for biodegradation potential using the soil‐burial test method. The tests were conducted in the field as well as in the laboratory. We found that the baseboards degraded regardless of differences in coating; however, the degradation rate was different. The laboratory conditions as well as the addition of inoculum accelerated the degradation process. The coated layer of the boards was isolated by laminating with black polyethylene; then their biodegradation rate was compared to the biodegradation rate of the control, boards coated with low‐density polyethylene. It was observed that paperboards coated with polyester‐based polymers were biodegradable but at different rates. The differences in the biodegradation rates of the boards were attributed to their coating formulations.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)3193-3202
Number of pages10
JournalJournal of Applied Polymer Science
Volume100
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Biodegradation
Soils
Polyethylene
Polyethylenes
Degradation
Laminating
Coatings
Biodegradable polymers
Paperboards

Keywords

  • biodegradable
  • barrier
  • polyesters
  • polyethylene (PE)

Cite this

Nazhad, M.M. ; Sridach, W. ; Retulainen, Elias ; Kuusipalo, J. ; Parkpian, P. / Biodegradation potential of some barrier-coated boards in different soil environments. In: Journal of Applied Polymer Science. 2006 ; Vol. 100, No. 4. pp. 3193-3202.
@article{74d07476d80d40a5a807d93db4bddcba,
title = "Biodegradation potential of some barrier-coated boards in different soil environments",
abstract = "Three pilot barrier‐coated boards that were recently produced at the Tampere University of Technology were tested for biodegradation potential using the soil‐burial test method. The tests were conducted in the field as well as in the laboratory. We found that the baseboards degraded regardless of differences in coating; however, the degradation rate was different. The laboratory conditions as well as the addition of inoculum accelerated the degradation process. The coated layer of the boards was isolated by laminating with black polyethylene; then their biodegradation rate was compared to the biodegradation rate of the control, boards coated with low‐density polyethylene. It was observed that paperboards coated with polyester‐based polymers were biodegradable but at different rates. The differences in the biodegradation rates of the boards were attributed to their coating formulations.",
keywords = "biodegradable, barrier, polyesters, polyethylene (PE)",
author = "M.M. Nazhad and W. Sridach and Elias Retulainen and J. Kuusipalo and P. Parkpian",
year = "2006",
doi = "10.1002/app.23591",
language = "English",
volume = "100",
pages = "3193--3202",
journal = "Journal of Applied Polymer Science",
issn = "0021-8995",
publisher = "Wiley",
number = "4",

}

Biodegradation potential of some barrier-coated boards in different soil environments. / Nazhad, M.M. (Corresponding Author); Sridach, W.; Retulainen, Elias; Kuusipalo, J.; Parkpian, P.

In: Journal of Applied Polymer Science, Vol. 100, No. 4, 2006, p. 3193-3202.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Biodegradation potential of some barrier-coated boards in different soil environments

AU - Nazhad, M.M.

AU - Sridach, W.

AU - Retulainen, Elias

AU - Kuusipalo, J.

AU - Parkpian, P.

PY - 2006

Y1 - 2006

N2 - Three pilot barrier‐coated boards that were recently produced at the Tampere University of Technology were tested for biodegradation potential using the soil‐burial test method. The tests were conducted in the field as well as in the laboratory. We found that the baseboards degraded regardless of differences in coating; however, the degradation rate was different. The laboratory conditions as well as the addition of inoculum accelerated the degradation process. The coated layer of the boards was isolated by laminating with black polyethylene; then their biodegradation rate was compared to the biodegradation rate of the control, boards coated with low‐density polyethylene. It was observed that paperboards coated with polyester‐based polymers were biodegradable but at different rates. The differences in the biodegradation rates of the boards were attributed to their coating formulations.

AB - Three pilot barrier‐coated boards that were recently produced at the Tampere University of Technology were tested for biodegradation potential using the soil‐burial test method. The tests were conducted in the field as well as in the laboratory. We found that the baseboards degraded regardless of differences in coating; however, the degradation rate was different. The laboratory conditions as well as the addition of inoculum accelerated the degradation process. The coated layer of the boards was isolated by laminating with black polyethylene; then their biodegradation rate was compared to the biodegradation rate of the control, boards coated with low‐density polyethylene. It was observed that paperboards coated with polyester‐based polymers were biodegradable but at different rates. The differences in the biodegradation rates of the boards were attributed to their coating formulations.

KW - biodegradable

KW - barrier

KW - polyesters

KW - polyethylene (PE)

U2 - 10.1002/app.23591

DO - 10.1002/app.23591

M3 - Article

VL - 100

SP - 3193

EP - 3202

JO - Journal of Applied Polymer Science

JF - Journal of Applied Polymer Science

SN - 0021-8995

IS - 4

ER -