Bioethanol from spruce bark: A concept study of a biorefinery process integrated into a Finnish pulp mill

Eemeli Hytönen, Olli Aaltonen

    Research output: Contribution to conferenceOther conference contributionScientific

    Abstract

    A techno-economic evaluation of a softwood bark biorefinery concept integrated into a typical Finnish chemical pulping mill was carried out. Due to the higher carbohydrate content of spruce bark over pine bark, spruce bark was chosen to be the feedstock of the study. The pulp production capacity of the mill was assumed to be 600 000 t/yr. Since bark constitutes about 10% of the softwood the total amount of bark at the mill is 130 000 t dry bark/yr. In this study half of this bark is led to the bio-refinery. The clear conclusion of the study is that the studied concept is not profitable with current prices and process steps: Enzyme and feedstock costs constitute the major part of the operation and maintenance costs (~70%). From the cost structure it can also be seen, that the price of the end products should be several €/kg. One profitable concept would be the extraction of phenolics straight from bark or from pre-treated bark and upgrading them to valuable products.
    Original languageEnglish
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    MoE publication typeNot Eligible
    Event11th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, PRES 2008 - Prague, Czech Republic
    Duration: 24 Aug 200828 Aug 2008

    Conference

    Conference11th Conference on Process Integration, Modelling and Optimisation for Energy Saving and Pollution Reduction, PRES 2008
    Abbreviated titlePRES 2008
    Country/TerritoryCzech Republic
    CityPrague
    Period24/08/0828/08/08

    Keywords

    • Bark biorefinery
    • Bioethanol
    • Techno-economic study

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Bioethanol from spruce bark: A concept study of a biorefinery process integrated into a Finnish pulp mill'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this