Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China

Guangyu Cao, Miimu Airaksinen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Nowadays, the built environment has a large impact on the natural environment, economy, health and productivity. In the Europe, building sector is attributed with more than 40% of the total energy use, 30% the CO2 emissions, and is estimated to generate 40% of all man-made waste. To fight against global warming and the degradation of the environment, different countries are striving to develop regional solutions to improve the building performance and mitigate the impact of building on the environment. The sub-objectives of this study are: to identify the different strategies of the two national labelling systems, to analyze the trends of the national labeling systems regarding building environment. In different building labeling system, various weighting systems are employed. On the other hand, these tools highlighted some common issues of building sustainable performance, which can be summarized as five key issues of building sector through the whole lifecycle phases: site, water, energy, material, and IEQ. Other issues can be regarded as the technique and strategy innovation to achieve the sustainable performance of the above five issues. As a benchmarking system, it must identify best practices under specific climate conditions and development stage. Through the view of the four countries' building labeling system, it was found that besides energy aspect, the health and wellbeing or indoor environment quality are ranked the most important aspect to assess the building environment. The Chinese building labelling is supported by various separated regulations and thus needs more effort to be improved in the future regarding the different local conditions.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationCLIMA 2010
Subtitle of host publication10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings
Publication statusPublished - 2010
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings, CLIMA 2010 - Antalaya, Turkey
Duration: 9 May 201012 May 2010
Conference number: 10

Conference

Conference10th REHVA World Congress
Abbreviated titleCLIMA 2010
CountryTurkey
CityAntalaya
Period9/05/1012/05/10

Fingerprint

Labeling
Health
Hand tools
Global warming
Benchmarking
Innovation
Productivity
Degradation
Water

Keywords

  • Building labeling
  • environment impact
  • energy
  • building performance
  • regulations

Cite this

Cao, G., & Airaksinen, M. (2010). Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China. In CLIMA 2010: 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings
Cao, Guangyu ; Airaksinen, Miimu. / Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China. CLIMA 2010: 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings. 2010.
@inproceedings{8098bd27f35048f9a43e1cd9acf9aa6f,
title = "Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China",
abstract = "Nowadays, the built environment has a large impact on the natural environment, economy, health and productivity. In the Europe, building sector is attributed with more than 40{\%} of the total energy use, 30{\%} the CO2 emissions, and is estimated to generate 40{\%} of all man-made waste. To fight against global warming and the degradation of the environment, different countries are striving to develop regional solutions to improve the building performance and mitigate the impact of building on the environment. The sub-objectives of this study are: to identify the different strategies of the two national labelling systems, to analyze the trends of the national labeling systems regarding building environment. In different building labeling system, various weighting systems are employed. On the other hand, these tools highlighted some common issues of building sustainable performance, which can be summarized as five key issues of building sector through the whole lifecycle phases: site, water, energy, material, and IEQ. Other issues can be regarded as the technique and strategy innovation to achieve the sustainable performance of the above five issues. As a benchmarking system, it must identify best practices under specific climate conditions and development stage. Through the view of the four countries' building labeling system, it was found that besides energy aspect, the health and wellbeing or indoor environment quality are ranked the most important aspect to assess the building environment. The Chinese building labelling is supported by various separated regulations and thus needs more effort to be improved in the future regarding the different local conditions.",
keywords = "Building labeling, environment impact, energy, building performance, regulations",
author = "Guangyu Cao and Miimu Airaksinen",
note = "Alternative title: Building environment labelling strategies and trends in Finland and China",
year = "2010",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-975-6907-14-6",
booktitle = "CLIMA 2010",

}

Cao, G & Airaksinen, M 2010, Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China. in CLIMA 2010: 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings. 10th REHVA World Congress, Antalaya, Turkey, 9/05/10.

Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China. / Cao, Guangyu; Airaksinen, Miimu.

CLIMA 2010: 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings. 2010.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China

AU - Cao, Guangyu

AU - Airaksinen, Miimu

N1 - Alternative title: Building environment labelling strategies and trends in Finland and China

PY - 2010

Y1 - 2010

N2 - Nowadays, the built environment has a large impact on the natural environment, economy, health and productivity. In the Europe, building sector is attributed with more than 40% of the total energy use, 30% the CO2 emissions, and is estimated to generate 40% of all man-made waste. To fight against global warming and the degradation of the environment, different countries are striving to develop regional solutions to improve the building performance and mitigate the impact of building on the environment. The sub-objectives of this study are: to identify the different strategies of the two national labelling systems, to analyze the trends of the national labeling systems regarding building environment. In different building labeling system, various weighting systems are employed. On the other hand, these tools highlighted some common issues of building sustainable performance, which can be summarized as five key issues of building sector through the whole lifecycle phases: site, water, energy, material, and IEQ. Other issues can be regarded as the technique and strategy innovation to achieve the sustainable performance of the above five issues. As a benchmarking system, it must identify best practices under specific climate conditions and development stage. Through the view of the four countries' building labeling system, it was found that besides energy aspect, the health and wellbeing or indoor environment quality are ranked the most important aspect to assess the building environment. The Chinese building labelling is supported by various separated regulations and thus needs more effort to be improved in the future regarding the different local conditions.

AB - Nowadays, the built environment has a large impact on the natural environment, economy, health and productivity. In the Europe, building sector is attributed with more than 40% of the total energy use, 30% the CO2 emissions, and is estimated to generate 40% of all man-made waste. To fight against global warming and the degradation of the environment, different countries are striving to develop regional solutions to improve the building performance and mitigate the impact of building on the environment. The sub-objectives of this study are: to identify the different strategies of the two national labelling systems, to analyze the trends of the national labeling systems regarding building environment. In different building labeling system, various weighting systems are employed. On the other hand, these tools highlighted some common issues of building sustainable performance, which can be summarized as five key issues of building sector through the whole lifecycle phases: site, water, energy, material, and IEQ. Other issues can be regarded as the technique and strategy innovation to achieve the sustainable performance of the above five issues. As a benchmarking system, it must identify best practices under specific climate conditions and development stage. Through the view of the four countries' building labeling system, it was found that besides energy aspect, the health and wellbeing or indoor environment quality are ranked the most important aspect to assess the building environment. The Chinese building labelling is supported by various separated regulations and thus needs more effort to be improved in the future regarding the different local conditions.

KW - Building labeling

KW - environment impact

KW - energy

KW - building performance

KW - regulations

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-975-6907-14-6

BT - CLIMA 2010

ER -

Cao G, Airaksinen M. Building labeling strategies and trends in Finland and China. In CLIMA 2010: 10th REHVA World Congress: Sustainable Energy Use in Buildings. 2010