Abstract
Many governments worldwide are setting more stringent
targets for reductions in energy use in government/public
buildings. Buildings constructed more than 10 years ago
account for a major share of energy used by the building
stock. However, the funding and "know-how" (applied
knowledge) available for owner-directed energy retrofit
projects has not kept pace with new requirements. With
typical retrofit projects, reduction of energy use varies
between 10% and 20%, while experience from executed
projects around the globe shows that energy-use reduction
can exceed 50%, and renovated buildings can
cost-effectively achieve the passive-house standard or
even approach net zero energy status (Hermelink and
Muller, 2010; NBI 2014; R1CS 2013;
GreenBuildingAdvisor.com 2013; Shonder and Nasseri 2015;
Miller and Higgins 2015; Emmerich et al. 2011). Previous
research conducted under the International Energy
Agency's Energy in Buildings and Communities Program (IEA
EBC) Annex 46 identified and analyzed more than 400
energy-efficiency measures that can be used when
buildings are retrofitted. Measures include those related
to the building envelope, mechanical and lighting
systems, energy generation and distribution, and internal
processes. Implementation of some individual measures
(such as building envelope insulation, improved
airtightness, and cogeneration) can significantly reduce
building heating and cooling loads or minimize of energy
waste, but require significant investments with long
paybacks. However, when a limited number of core
technologies are implemented together, or bundled, they
can significantly reduce energy use for a smaller
investment, thereby providing a faster payback. In some
countries, energy savings performance contracts (ESPC)
have proven to be an effective tool for implementing
energy retrofit projects. Nevertheless, in many countries
the number of projects funded by ESPCs still do not form
a significant part of the total investment budgeted by
public institutions for energy retrofits. This paper
presents the concept and several case studies that
illustrate mechanisms that will increase the acceptance
of deep energy retrofit (DER) and broaden acceptance of
its implementation using ESPCs for a comprehensive
refurbishment of existing buildings.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | ASHRAE Transactions |
Volume | 2 |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
MoE publication type | A4 Article in a conference publication |
Event | ASHRAE Annual Conference 2005 - Atlanta, United States Duration: 27 Jun 2015 → 1 Jul 2015 |