Calibration of surface roughness standards

R. Thalmann; A. Nicolet; F. Meli; G.B. Picotto; M. Matus; L. Carcedo; Björn Hemming; O. Ganioglu; L. De Chiffre; F. Saraiva; S. Bergstrand; S. Zelenika; A. Tonmueanwai; C-L. Tsai; W. Shihua; O. Kruger; M.M. de Souza; J.A. Salgado; Z. Ramotowski

doi:10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

Calibration of surface roughness standards

R. Thalmann, A. Nicolet, F. Meli, G.B. Picotto, M. Matus, L. Carcedo, Björn Hemming, O. Ganioglu, L. De Chiffre, F. Saraiva, S. Bergstrand, S. Zelenika, A. Tonmueanwai, C-L. Tsai, W. Shihua, O. Kruger, M.M. de Souza, J.A. Salgado, Z. Ramotowski

BA6601 Length metrology

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › Scientific › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The key comparison EURAMET.L-K8.2013 on roughness was carried out in the framework of a EURAMET project starting in 2013 and ending in 2015. It involved the participation of 17 National Metrology Institutes from Europe, Asia, South America and Africa representing four regional metrology organisations. Five surface texture standards of different type were circulated and on each of the standards several roughness parameters according to the standard ISO 4287 had to be determined. 32 out of 395 individual results were not consistent with the reference value. After some corrective actions the number of inconsistent results could be reduced to 20, which correspond to about 5% of the total and can statistically be expected. In addition to the material standards, two softgauges were circulated, which allow to test the software of the instruments used in the comparison. The comparison results help to support the calibraton and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the laboratories involved in the CIPM MRA.

Original language	English
Article number	04001
Journal	Metrologia
Volume	53
Issue number	Technical Supplement
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001
Publication status	Published - 2016
MoE publication type	A1 Journal article-refereed

Access to Document

10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

Cite this

Thalmann, R., Nicolet, A., Meli, F., Picotto, G. B., Matus, M., Carcedo, L., Hemming, B., Ganioglu, O., De Chiffre, L., Saraiva, F., Bergstrand, S., Zelenika, S., Tonmueanwai, A., Tsai, C.-L., Shihua, W., Kruger, O., de Souza, M. M., Salgado, J. A., & Ramotowski, Z. (2016). Calibration of surface roughness standards. Metrologia, 53(Technical Supplement), Article 04001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

@article{f9d52d8a34c848128ee5ab47e4ff43bb,

title = "Calibration of surface roughness standards",

abstract = "The key comparison EURAMET.L-K8.2013 on roughness was carried out in the framework of a EURAMET project starting in 2013 and ending in 2015. It involved the participation of 17 National Metrology Institutes from Europe, Asia, South America and Africa representing four regional metrology organisations. Five surface texture standards of different type were circulated and on each of the standards several roughness parameters according to the standard ISO 4287 had to be determined. 32 out of 395 individual results were not consistent with the reference value. After some corrective actions the number of inconsistent results could be reduced to 20, which correspond to about 5% of the total and can statistically be expected. In addition to the material standards, two softgauges were circulated, which allow to test the software of the instruments used in the comparison. The comparison results help to support the calibraton and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the laboratories involved in the CIPM MRA.",

author = "R. Thalmann and A. Nicolet and F. Meli and G.B. Picotto and M. Matus and L. Carcedo and Bj{\"o}rn Hemming and O. Ganioglu and {De Chiffre}, L. and F. Saraiva and S. Bergstrand and S. Zelenika and A. Tonmueanwai and C-L. Tsai and W. Shihua and O. Kruger and {de Souza}, M.M. and J.A. Salgado and Z. Ramotowski",

year = "2016",

doi = "10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001",

language = "English",

volume = "53",

journal = "Metrologia",

issn = "0026-1394",

publisher = "Institute of Physics IOP",

number = "Technical Supplement",

}

Thalmann, R, Nicolet, A, Meli, F, Picotto, GB, Matus, M, Carcedo, L, Hemming, B, Ganioglu, O, De Chiffre, L, Saraiva, F, Bergstrand, S, Zelenika, S, Tonmueanwai, A, Tsai, C-L, Shihua, W, Kruger, O, de Souza, MM, Salgado, JA & Ramotowski, Z 2016, 'Calibration of surface roughness standards', Metrologia, vol. 53, no. Technical Supplement, 04001. https://doi.org/10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

TY - JOUR

T1 - Calibration of surface roughness standards

AU - Thalmann, R.

AU - Nicolet, A.

AU - Meli, F.

AU - Picotto, G.B.

AU - Matus, M.

AU - Carcedo, L.

AU - Hemming, Björn

AU - Ganioglu, O.

AU - De Chiffre, L.

AU - Saraiva, F.

AU - Bergstrand, S.

AU - Zelenika, S.

AU - Tonmueanwai, A.

AU - Tsai, C-L.

AU - Shihua, W.

AU - Kruger, O.

AU - de Souza, M.M.

AU - Salgado, J.A.

AU - Ramotowski, Z.

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - The key comparison EURAMET.L-K8.2013 on roughness was carried out in the framework of a EURAMET project starting in 2013 and ending in 2015. It involved the participation of 17 National Metrology Institutes from Europe, Asia, South America and Africa representing four regional metrology organisations. Five surface texture standards of different type were circulated and on each of the standards several roughness parameters according to the standard ISO 4287 had to be determined. 32 out of 395 individual results were not consistent with the reference value. After some corrective actions the number of inconsistent results could be reduced to 20, which correspond to about 5% of the total and can statistically be expected. In addition to the material standards, two softgauges were circulated, which allow to test the software of the instruments used in the comparison. The comparison results help to support the calibraton and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the laboratories involved in the CIPM MRA.

AB - The key comparison EURAMET.L-K8.2013 on roughness was carried out in the framework of a EURAMET project starting in 2013 and ending in 2015. It involved the participation of 17 National Metrology Institutes from Europe, Asia, South America and Africa representing four regional metrology organisations. Five surface texture standards of different type were circulated and on each of the standards several roughness parameters according to the standard ISO 4287 had to be determined. 32 out of 395 individual results were not consistent with the reference value. After some corrective actions the number of inconsistent results could be reduced to 20, which correspond to about 5% of the total and can statistically be expected. In addition to the material standards, two softgauges were circulated, which allow to test the software of the instruments used in the comparison. The comparison results help to support the calibraton and measurement capabilities (CMCs) of the laboratories involved in the CIPM MRA.

U2 - 10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

DO - 10.1088/0026-1394/53/1A/04001

M3 - Article

SN - 0026-1394

VL - 53

JO - Metrologia

JF - Metrologia

IS - Technical Supplement

M1 - 04001

ER -

Calibration of surface roughness standards

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this