Can supplier innovations substitute for internal R&D? A multiple case study from an absorptive capacity perspective

Matti Pihlajamaa (Corresponding Author), Riikka Kaipia, Julius Säilä, Kari Tanskanen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

5 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Prior literature suggests that significant internal R&D resources are needed to leverage suppliers for innovation and that external knowledge sources can be used to complement the internal knowledge base. Based on the analysis of four inbound open innovation projects at Fortum, a multinational energy utility company, we argue that companies with low R&D intensity may adopt an alternative approach which aims at substituting - not merely complementing - internal R&D with external innovations. We adopt the absorptive capacity perspective while investigating the cases and focus on four distinct capabilities: acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation. We find that the substitution approach consists of short-term research on new technological areas in order to gain the ability to identify and evaluate alternative technologies, as well as joint business models and operations based on complementary capabilities between the parties. The cases also suggest that the innovation process requires significant collaboration and the buying company's supplier management capabilities may improve the success of inbound open innovation projects of this type.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)242-255
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Purchasing and Supply Management
Volume23
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Oct 2017
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Substitute
Open innovation
Innovation
Multiple case study
Suppliers
Absorptive capacity
Resources
Knowledge base
Energy
Substitution
Business model
Supplier management
Innovation process
Leverage
Multinationals
Exploitation
Management capability

Keywords

  • Absorptive capacity
  • Multiple case study
  • Open innovation
  • R&D intensity
  • Supplier innovation

Cite this

@article{263712ba7b03466d9d01c7ef33196c2b,
title = "Can supplier innovations substitute for internal R&D? A multiple case study from an absorptive capacity perspective",
abstract = "Prior literature suggests that significant internal R&D resources are needed to leverage suppliers for innovation and that external knowledge sources can be used to complement the internal knowledge base. Based on the analysis of four inbound open innovation projects at Fortum, a multinational energy utility company, we argue that companies with low R&D intensity may adopt an alternative approach which aims at substituting - not merely complementing - internal R&D with external innovations. We adopt the absorptive capacity perspective while investigating the cases and focus on four distinct capabilities: acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation. We find that the substitution approach consists of short-term research on new technological areas in order to gain the ability to identify and evaluate alternative technologies, as well as joint business models and operations based on complementary capabilities between the parties. The cases also suggest that the innovation process requires significant collaboration and the buying company's supplier management capabilities may improve the success of inbound open innovation projects of this type.",
keywords = "Absorptive capacity, Multiple case study, Open innovation, R&D intensity, Supplier innovation",
author = "Matti Pihlajamaa and Riikka Kaipia and Julius S{\"a}il{\"a} and Kari Tanskanen",
year = "2017",
month = "10",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
pages = "242--255",
journal = "Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management",
issn = "1478-4092",
number = "4",

}

Can supplier innovations substitute for internal R&D? A multiple case study from an absorptive capacity perspective. / Pihlajamaa, Matti (Corresponding Author); Kaipia, Riikka; Säilä, Julius; Tanskanen, Kari.

In: Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management, Vol. 23, No. 4, 01.10.2017, p. 242-255.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can supplier innovations substitute for internal R&D? A multiple case study from an absorptive capacity perspective

AU - Pihlajamaa, Matti

AU - Kaipia, Riikka

AU - Säilä, Julius

AU - Tanskanen, Kari

PY - 2017/10/1

Y1 - 2017/10/1

N2 - Prior literature suggests that significant internal R&D resources are needed to leverage suppliers for innovation and that external knowledge sources can be used to complement the internal knowledge base. Based on the analysis of four inbound open innovation projects at Fortum, a multinational energy utility company, we argue that companies with low R&D intensity may adopt an alternative approach which aims at substituting - not merely complementing - internal R&D with external innovations. We adopt the absorptive capacity perspective while investigating the cases and focus on four distinct capabilities: acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation. We find that the substitution approach consists of short-term research on new technological areas in order to gain the ability to identify and evaluate alternative technologies, as well as joint business models and operations based on complementary capabilities between the parties. The cases also suggest that the innovation process requires significant collaboration and the buying company's supplier management capabilities may improve the success of inbound open innovation projects of this type.

AB - Prior literature suggests that significant internal R&D resources are needed to leverage suppliers for innovation and that external knowledge sources can be used to complement the internal knowledge base. Based on the analysis of four inbound open innovation projects at Fortum, a multinational energy utility company, we argue that companies with low R&D intensity may adopt an alternative approach which aims at substituting - not merely complementing - internal R&D with external innovations. We adopt the absorptive capacity perspective while investigating the cases and focus on four distinct capabilities: acquisition, assimilation, transformation, and exploitation. We find that the substitution approach consists of short-term research on new technological areas in order to gain the ability to identify and evaluate alternative technologies, as well as joint business models and operations based on complementary capabilities between the parties. The cases also suggest that the innovation process requires significant collaboration and the buying company's supplier management capabilities may improve the success of inbound open innovation projects of this type.

KW - Absorptive capacity

KW - Multiple case study

KW - Open innovation

KW - R&D intensity

KW - Supplier innovation

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85028343036&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.pursup.2017.08.002

M3 - Article

VL - 23

SP - 242

EP - 255

JO - Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management

JF - Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management

SN - 1478-4092

IS - 4

ER -