Carbon efficient building solutions

Miimu Airaksinen (Corresponding Author), Pellervo Matilainen

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    8 Citations (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Traditionally, the Finnish legislation have focused on energy use and especially on energy used for heating space in buildings. However, in many cases this does not lead to the optimal concept in respect to minimizing green house gases. This paper studies how CO2 emission levels are affected by different measures to reduce energy use in buildings. This paper presents two real apartment buildings with different options of energy efficiency and power sources. The calculations clearly show that in the future electricity and domestic hot water use will have high importance in respect to energy efficiency, and therefore also CO2 equivalent (eq) emissions. The importance increases when the energy efficiency of the building increases. There are big differences between average Finnish production and individual power plants; CO2 eq emissions might nearly double depending on the energy source and the power plant type. Both a building with an efficient district heating as a power source, and a building with ground heat in addition to nuclear power electricity as a complimentary electricity source performed very similarly to each other in respect to CO2 eq emissions. However, it is dangerous to conclude that it is not important which energy source is chosen. If hypothetically, the use of district heating would dramatically drop, the primary energy factor and CO2 eq emissions from electricity would rise, which in turn would lead to the increase of the ground heat systems emissions. A problem in the yearly calculations is that the fact that it is very important, sometimes even crucial, when energy is needed, is always excluded.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)844-858
    Number of pages15
    JournalSustainability
    Volume2
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Electricity
    energy
    Energy efficiency
    Carbon
    District heating
    carbon
    electricity
    energy efficiency
    district heating
    Power plants
    energy use
    power plant
    energy source
    Space heating
    efficiency
    heat
    Greenhouse gases
    Nuclear energy
    building
    apartment building

    Keywords

    • energy efficiency
    • primary energy
    • building concepts

    Cite this

    Airaksinen, M., & Matilainen, P. (2010). Carbon efficient building solutions. Sustainability, 2(3), 844-858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2030844
    Airaksinen, Miimu ; Matilainen, Pellervo. / Carbon efficient building solutions. In: Sustainability. 2010 ; Vol. 2, No. 3. pp. 844-858.
    @article{2a0650e9a88545fabbcfc85f1243e25c,
    title = "Carbon efficient building solutions",
    abstract = "Traditionally, the Finnish legislation have focused on energy use and especially on energy used for heating space in buildings. However, in many cases this does not lead to the optimal concept in respect to minimizing green house gases. This paper studies how CO2 emission levels are affected by different measures to reduce energy use in buildings. This paper presents two real apartment buildings with different options of energy efficiency and power sources. The calculations clearly show that in the future electricity and domestic hot water use will have high importance in respect to energy efficiency, and therefore also CO2 equivalent (eq) emissions. The importance increases when the energy efficiency of the building increases. There are big differences between average Finnish production and individual power plants; CO2 eq emissions might nearly double depending on the energy source and the power plant type. Both a building with an efficient district heating as a power source, and a building with ground heat in addition to nuclear power electricity as a complimentary electricity source performed very similarly to each other in respect to CO2 eq emissions. However, it is dangerous to conclude that it is not important which energy source is chosen. If hypothetically, the use of district heating would dramatically drop, the primary energy factor and CO2 eq emissions from electricity would rise, which in turn would lead to the increase of the ground heat systems emissions. A problem in the yearly calculations is that the fact that it is very important, sometimes even crucial, when energy is needed, is always excluded.",
    keywords = "energy efficiency, primary energy, building concepts",
    author = "Miimu Airaksinen and Pellervo Matilainen",
    year = "2010",
    doi = "10.3390/su2030844",
    language = "English",
    volume = "2",
    pages = "844--858",
    journal = "Sustainability",
    issn = "2071-1050",
    publisher = "MDPI",
    number = "3",

    }

    Airaksinen, M & Matilainen, P 2010, 'Carbon efficient building solutions', Sustainability, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 844-858. https://doi.org/10.3390/su2030844

    Carbon efficient building solutions. / Airaksinen, Miimu (Corresponding Author); Matilainen, Pellervo.

    In: Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 3, 2010, p. 844-858.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Carbon efficient building solutions

    AU - Airaksinen, Miimu

    AU - Matilainen, Pellervo

    PY - 2010

    Y1 - 2010

    N2 - Traditionally, the Finnish legislation have focused on energy use and especially on energy used for heating space in buildings. However, in many cases this does not lead to the optimal concept in respect to minimizing green house gases. This paper studies how CO2 emission levels are affected by different measures to reduce energy use in buildings. This paper presents two real apartment buildings with different options of energy efficiency and power sources. The calculations clearly show that in the future electricity and domestic hot water use will have high importance in respect to energy efficiency, and therefore also CO2 equivalent (eq) emissions. The importance increases when the energy efficiency of the building increases. There are big differences between average Finnish production and individual power plants; CO2 eq emissions might nearly double depending on the energy source and the power plant type. Both a building with an efficient district heating as a power source, and a building with ground heat in addition to nuclear power electricity as a complimentary electricity source performed very similarly to each other in respect to CO2 eq emissions. However, it is dangerous to conclude that it is not important which energy source is chosen. If hypothetically, the use of district heating would dramatically drop, the primary energy factor and CO2 eq emissions from electricity would rise, which in turn would lead to the increase of the ground heat systems emissions. A problem in the yearly calculations is that the fact that it is very important, sometimes even crucial, when energy is needed, is always excluded.

    AB - Traditionally, the Finnish legislation have focused on energy use and especially on energy used for heating space in buildings. However, in many cases this does not lead to the optimal concept in respect to minimizing green house gases. This paper studies how CO2 emission levels are affected by different measures to reduce energy use in buildings. This paper presents two real apartment buildings with different options of energy efficiency and power sources. The calculations clearly show that in the future electricity and domestic hot water use will have high importance in respect to energy efficiency, and therefore also CO2 equivalent (eq) emissions. The importance increases when the energy efficiency of the building increases. There are big differences between average Finnish production and individual power plants; CO2 eq emissions might nearly double depending on the energy source and the power plant type. Both a building with an efficient district heating as a power source, and a building with ground heat in addition to nuclear power electricity as a complimentary electricity source performed very similarly to each other in respect to CO2 eq emissions. However, it is dangerous to conclude that it is not important which energy source is chosen. If hypothetically, the use of district heating would dramatically drop, the primary energy factor and CO2 eq emissions from electricity would rise, which in turn would lead to the increase of the ground heat systems emissions. A problem in the yearly calculations is that the fact that it is very important, sometimes even crucial, when energy is needed, is always excluded.

    KW - energy efficiency

    KW - primary energy

    KW - building concepts

    U2 - 10.3390/su2030844

    DO - 10.3390/su2030844

    M3 - Article

    VL - 2

    SP - 844

    EP - 858

    JO - Sustainability

    JF - Sustainability

    SN - 2071-1050

    IS - 3

    ER -