Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | SAFIR2010 |
| Subtitle of host publication | The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010: Final Report |
| Place of Publication | Espoo |
| Publisher | VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland |
| Pages | 531-537 |
| ISBN (Electronic) | 978-951-38-7690-6 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-951-38-7689-0 |
| Publication status | Published - 2011 |
| MoE publication type | Not Eligible |
Publication series
| Series | VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes |
|---|---|
| Number | 2571 |
| ISSN | 1235-0605 |
Fingerprint
Cite this
}
Challenges in Risk-informed Safety Management (CHARISMA) : EXAM-HRA Project Phase 1: Survey of HRA practices in Nordic and German PRAs. / Männistö, Ilkka; Holmberg, Jan-Erik.
SAFIR2010: The Finnish Research Programme on Safety 2007-2010: Final Report. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 2011. p. 531-537 (VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes; No. 2571).Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Chapter or book article › Professional
TY - CHAP
T1 - Challenges in Risk-informed Safety Management (CHARISMA)
T2 - EXAM-HRA Project Phase 1: Survey of HRA practices in Nordic and German PRAs
AU - Männistö, Ilkka
AU - Holmberg, Jan-Erik
PY - 2011
Y1 - 2011
N2 - The research activities and findings of the EXAM-HRA project phase 1 are detailed in this special article. EXAM-HRA is a Nordic-German co-operation project for surveying and developing a best practices guideline for performing HRA (human reliability analysis) in Swedish, Finnish and German NPPs (nuclear power plants). Phase 1 work was completed in 1, and included a survey of the current HRA practices and methodologies used in selected Swedish, Finnish and German NPPs. The aim of the research was to develop a method for identifying similar human failure events at the different plants, and subsequently discern the reason for any differences in the analysis. Differences in the HRA analysis mainly come from two sources: differences plant design or operational features, or differences HRA practices used to analyse to human actions. Another objective in this work is to identify good practices in plant operations and HRA analysis. Phase 1 work was done in preparation for Phase 2 starting in early 2011, where the actual guidelines are produced based on the findings of Phase 1. EXAM-HRA is an NPSAG project and VTTs participation in the project was coordinated within the CHARISMA project, which is a part of the SAFIR2010 research program.
AB - The research activities and findings of the EXAM-HRA project phase 1 are detailed in this special article. EXAM-HRA is a Nordic-German co-operation project for surveying and developing a best practices guideline for performing HRA (human reliability analysis) in Swedish, Finnish and German NPPs (nuclear power plants). Phase 1 work was completed in 1, and included a survey of the current HRA practices and methodologies used in selected Swedish, Finnish and German NPPs. The aim of the research was to develop a method for identifying similar human failure events at the different plants, and subsequently discern the reason for any differences in the analysis. Differences in the HRA analysis mainly come from two sources: differences plant design or operational features, or differences HRA practices used to analyse to human actions. Another objective in this work is to identify good practices in plant operations and HRA analysis. Phase 1 work was done in preparation for Phase 2 starting in early 2011, where the actual guidelines are produced based on the findings of Phase 1. EXAM-HRA is an NPSAG project and VTTs participation in the project was coordinated within the CHARISMA project, which is a part of the SAFIR2010 research program.
M3 - Chapter or book article
SN - 978-951-38-7689-0
T3 - VTT Tiedotteita - Research Notes
SP - 531
EP - 537
BT - SAFIR2010
PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
CY - Espoo
ER -