Abstract
This study characterised the volatile compounds in flatbreads prepared from red non-tannin sorghum flour, cassava starch, whole and dehulled red and white cowpea flours and composite flours (30% cowpea flour and varying combinations of cassava starch and sorghum flour). Compounds were extracted using solid-phase microextraction (SPME) and determined by GC-TOF-HRMS. A wheat flatbread was used as the standard. Compounds that were correlated with aroma and flavour attributes were identified. Volatile compound classes included hydrocarbons, aldehydes, alcohols, acids, esters, ketones, benzene derivatives, sulphur- and nitrogen-containing compounds, terpenes and terpenoids. Adding sorghum flour to the composite reduced the generation of aldehydes and contributed 2-methoxyphenol and 2-methoxy-4-vinylphenol to the flatbreads. The cassava starch presented acetic acid and aldehydes, which contributed to the fermented and green aroma of cassava–cowpea composite-flour flatbreads. The cowpea variety influenced the volatile profile of flatbread. The red cowpea flatbreads had more 1-octen-3-ol, phenylethyl alcohol and decane, different from the white cowpea flatbreads. Soaking and dehulling the cowpeas reduced flour hexanal levels while increasing 1-hexanol and 1-octen-3-ol in derived flatbreads. Cowpea flatbreads were characterised by pyrazines, with higher levels contributed by dehulled flour. The main compounds responsible for beany flavour were dimethyl trisulphide, hexanal, nonanal, 1-octen-3-ol, 2-pentylfuran, heptanal and 1-(2-furanyl)-2-butanone. Characterising the aroma compounds of flatbreads prepared from sorghum, cassava and cowpea flours offers valuable insights that manufacturers can apply to improve the sensory quality of bread products made from these flours to meet specific consumer demands and preferences and diversify bread flour options.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Article number | e70063 |
| Journal | Legume Science |
| Volume | 7 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2025 |
| MoE publication type | A1 Journal article-refereed |
Funding
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Leap Agric 400, and the European Commission, 727715. Financial support by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, LEAP‐Agri Research Cooperation Programme (grant number, Leap Agric 400) and the European Union (grant number, 727715) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. Ethical approval for the sensory evaluation was granted by an ethics committee of the University of Pretoria (NAS279/2020). This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa, Leap Agric 400, and the European Commission, 727715. Financial support by the National Research Foundation (NRF) of South Africa, LEAP-Agri Research Cooperation Programme (grant number, Leap Agric 400) and the European Union (grant number, 727715) towards this research is hereby acknowledged. Opinions expressed and conclusions arrived at, are those of the author and are not necessarily to be attributed to the NRF. Ethical approval for the sensory evaluation was granted by an ethics committee of the University of Pretoria (NAS279/2020).
Keywords
- cassava
- cowpea
- flatbread
- GC-TOF-HRMS
- sorghum
- volatile compounds