TY - JOUR
T1 - Choice Architecture Cueing to Healthier Dietary Choices and Physical Activity at the Workplace: Implementation and Feasibility Evaluation
AU - Rantala, Eeva
AU - Vanhatalo, Saara
AU - Tilles-tirkkonen, Tanja
AU - Kanerva, Markus
AU - Hansen, Pelle Guldborg
AU - Kolehmainen, Marjukka
AU - Männikkö, Reija
AU - Lindström, Jaana
AU - Pihlajamäki, Jussi
AU - Poutanen, Kaisa
AU - Karhunen, Leila
AU - Absetz, Pilvikki
N1 - Funding Information:
This research was funded as part of the StopDia study by the Strategic Research Council of the Academy of Finland, grant number 303537; by Juho Vainio Foundation, grant number 202100138; and by Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, grant number 20207314. The article processing charge (APC) was funded by VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland and the University of Eastern Finland. We gratefully acknowledge all participating organisations and their representatives for collaboration; Federico Jose Armando Pérez-Cueto, at the Design and Consumer Behaviour Section of the Department of Food Science, University of Copenhagen, Denmark, for scientific advice; Raija-Liisa Heiniö, Principal Scientist, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, for assistance in identifying and contacting workplaces; Johanna Leväsluoto, Research Scientist, VTT, for a remarkable role in conducting the workshops; Henna Rannikko, Nora Hagman, and Mira Kuusisto, University of Eastern Finland (UEF), for assisting the Toolkit development; Marjaana Lahti-Koski and Mari Olli, Finnish Heart Association, for supporting material development and the use of the Heart Label in the intervention; Carita Elshout and Leena Louhisola, marketing and communica-tions agency Valve, and Bettina Lievonen, UEF, for the graphical design of intervention materials; Laura Karhu, Taija Rutanen, and Susanna Hynninen, UEF, for a substantial contribution to intervention implementation and data collection; and Meri Kohonen, Sara Juuti, Noora Järvinen, and Emilia Taskinen, UEF, for assistance in preparing the implementation.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland.
PY - 2021/10/14
Y1 - 2021/10/14
N2 - Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
AB - Redesigning choice environments appears a promising approach to encourage healthier eating and physical activity, but little evidence exists of the feasibility of this approach in real-world settings. The aim of this paper is to portray the implementation and feasibility assessment of a 12-month mixed-methods intervention study, StopDia at Work, targeting the environment of 53 diverse worksites. The intervention was conducted within a type 2 diabetes prevention study, StopDia. We assessed feasibility through the fidelity, facilitators and barriers, and maintenance of implementation, building on implementer interviews (n = 61 informants) and observations of the worksites at six (t1) and twelve months (t2). We analysed quantitative data with Kruskall–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U tests and qualitative data with content analysis. Intervention sites altogether implemented 23 various choice architectural strategies (median 3, range 0–14 strategies/site), employing 21 behaviour change mechanisms. Quantitative analysis found implementation was successful in 66%, imperfect in 25%, and failed in 9% of evaluated cases. These ratings were independent of the ease of implementation of applied strategies and reminders that implementers received. Researchers’ assistance in intervention launch (p = 0.02) and direct contact to intervention sites (p < 0.001) predicted higher fidelity at t1, but not at t2. Qualitative content analysis identified facilitators and barriers related to the organisation, intervention, worksite environment, implementer, and user. Contributors of successful implementation included apt implementers, sufficient implementer training, careful planning, integration into worksite values and activities, and management support. After the study, 49% of the worksites intended to maintain the implementation in some form. Overall, the choice architecture approach seems suitable for workplace health promotion, but a range of practicalities warrant consideration while designing real-world implementation.
KW - Behaviour change
KW - Choice architecture
KW - Diet
KW - Health promotion
KW - Implementation research
KW - Nudge
KW - Physical activity
KW - Prevention
KW - Type 2 diabetes
KW - Workplace
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85116969428&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3390/nu13103592
DO - 10.3390/nu13103592
M3 - Article
SN - 2072-6643
VL - 13
JO - Nutrients
JF - Nutrients
IS - 10
M1 - 3592
ER -