Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?

Maria Antikainen, Heli Väätäjä

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008
Place of PublicationTampere
Editioncd-rom
ISBN (Electronic)978-952-15-2091-4, 978-951-39-3427-9
Publication statusPublished - 2008
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

Fingerprint

Open innovation
Thrifts
Online communities
Reward
Innovation process
Intermediaries
Empirical study
Problem solving
Innovation
Willingness

Keywords

  • online communities
  • open innovation
  • intermediaries
  • rewarding
  • collaboration
  • monetary
  • non-monetary
  • tangible
  • intangible
  • recognition
  • motivation
  • case study

Cite this

Antikainen, M., & Väätäjä, H. (2008). Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? In Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008 (cd-rom ed.). Tampere.
Antikainen, Maria ; Väätäjä, Heli. / Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?. Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom. ed. Tampere, 2008.
@inproceedings{00763425689e440d934792e3658c3437,
title = "Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?",
abstract = "Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.",
keywords = "online communities, open innovation, intermediaries, rewarding, collaboration, monetary, non-monetary, tangible, intangible, recognition, motivation, case study",
author = "Maria Antikainen and Heli V{\"a}{\"a}t{\"a}j{\"a}",
note = "Project code: 10520",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-952-15-2090-7",
booktitle = "Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008",
edition = "cd-rom",

}

Antikainen, M & Väätäjä, H 2008, Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? in Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom edn, Tampere.

Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? / Antikainen, Maria; Väätäjä, Heli.

Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom. ed. Tampere, 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?

AU - Antikainen, Maria

AU - Väätäjä, Heli

N1 - Project code: 10520

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.

AB - Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.

KW - online communities

KW - open innovation

KW - intermediaries

KW - rewarding

KW - collaboration

KW - monetary

KW - non-monetary

KW - tangible

KW - intangible

KW - recognition

KW - motivation

KW - case study

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-952-15-2090-7

SN - 978-951-39-3426-2

BT - Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008

CY - Tampere

ER -

Antikainen M, Väätäjä H. Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? In Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom ed. Tampere. 2008