Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?

Maria Antikainen, Heli Väätäjä

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    Abstract

    Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008
    Place of PublicationTampere
    Editioncd-rom
    ISBN (Electronic)978-952-15-2091-4, 978-951-39-3427-9
    Publication statusPublished - 2008
    MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication

    Fingerprint

    Open innovation
    Thrifts
    Online communities
    Reward
    Innovation process
    Intermediaries
    Empirical study
    Problem solving
    Innovation
    Willingness

    Keywords

    • online communities
    • open innovation
    • intermediaries
    • rewarding
    • collaboration
    • monetary
    • non-monetary
    • tangible
    • intangible
    • recognition
    • motivation
    • case study

    Cite this

    Antikainen, M., & Väätäjä, H. (2008). Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? In Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008 (cd-rom ed.). Tampere.
    Antikainen, Maria ; Väätäjä, Heli. / Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?. Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom. ed. Tampere, 2008.
    @inproceedings{00763425689e440d934792e3658c3437,
    title = "Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?",
    abstract = "Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.",
    keywords = "online communities, open innovation, intermediaries, rewarding, collaboration, monetary, non-monetary, tangible, intangible, recognition, motivation, case study",
    author = "Maria Antikainen and Heli V{\"a}{\"a}t{\"a}j{\"a}",
    note = "Project code: 10520",
    year = "2008",
    language = "English",
    isbn = "978-952-15-2090-7",
    booktitle = "Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008",
    edition = "cd-rom",

    }

    Antikainen, M & Väätäjä, H 2008, Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? in Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom edn, Tampere.

    Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? / Antikainen, Maria; Väätäjä, Heli.

    Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom. ed. Tampere, 2008.

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

    TY - GEN

    T1 - Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it?

    AU - Antikainen, Maria

    AU - Väätäjä, Heli

    N1 - Project code: 10520

    PY - 2008

    Y1 - 2008

    N2 - Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.

    AB - Currently, many companies wish to find ways how to integrate their customers or innovative users into their innovation processes. Since earlier studies indicate that collective problem solving improves the quality of the ideas (e.g. Hargadon and Beckhy 2006; Thrift 2006), it is important to find out whether members are willing to collaborate in open innovation communities and how they should be rewarded to motivate collaboration in an innovationprocess. This empirical study aims to find out users' needs and willingness to collaborate and how rewarding can be used to motivate members to collaborate in open innovation communities. The study is a case study (Yin 2003) of three open innovation communities. The studied communities are FellowForce, CrowdSpirit and Owela, which are online open innovation communities acting as innovation intermediaries. Firstly, the results indicate that users see collaboration as an effective and enjoyable way to work and were willing to use more collaboration tools in online communities. Secondly, members gave concrete suggestions on the different kinds of rewarding models within groups. Both ways to reward, monetary and non-monetary ones were emphasised.

    KW - online communities

    KW - open innovation

    KW - intermediaries

    KW - rewarding

    KW - collaboration

    KW - monetary

    KW - non-monetary

    KW - tangible

    KW - intangible

    KW - recognition

    KW - motivation

    KW - case study

    M3 - Conference article in proceedings

    SN - 978-952-15-2090-7

    SN - 978-951-39-3426-2

    BT - Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008

    CY - Tampere

    ER -

    Antikainen M, Väätäjä H. Collaboration in open innovation communities - Do users want it? In Proceedings of EBRF 2008. Helsinki, Stockholm, 22 - 24 September 2008. cd-rom ed. Tampere. 2008