Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures

Brendan Ryan (Corresponding Author), Veli Pekka Kallberg, Helena Rådbo, Grigore M. Havârneanu, Anne Silla, Karoline Lukaschek, Jean Marie Burkhardt, Jean Luc Bruyelle, El Miloudi El-Koursi, Eric Beurskens, Maria Hedqvist

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

Abstract

It can be difficult to select from available safety preventative measures, especially where there is limited evidence of effectiveness in different contexts. This paper describes application of a method to identify and evaluate wide-ranging preventative measures for rail suicide and trespass fatalities. Evidence from literature and industry sources was collated and reviewed in a two stage process to achieve consensus among experts on the likely effects of the measures and factors influencing their implementation. Multiple evaluation criteria were used to examine the measures from different perspectives. Fencing, awareness campaigns and different types of organisational initiatives were recommended for further testing. This is the first time evidence has been collected internationally across such a range of preventative measures. Commentary is provided on using this type of approach to select safety measures from a pool of prevention options, including how re-framing the scope of the exercise could identify alternative options for prevention. Practitioner summary: The findings give insight to how different measures work in different ways and how industry can consider this in strategic initiatives. The method could be used in future studies with different frames of reference (e.g. different timescales, level of ambition and safety context e.g. railway crossings or highway fatalities). Abbreviation: RESTRAIL: REduction of Suicides and Trespasses on RAILway property.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1433-1453
Number of pages21
JournalErgonomics
Volume61
Issue number11
Early online date28 Oct 2018
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Nov 2018
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

Suicide
suicide
German Federal Railways
Safety
Industry
evidence
industry
Rails
Consensus
campaign
expert
Testing
evaluation
literature

Keywords

  • evaluation
  • experts and consensus methods
  • prevention
  • Rail fatalities
  • suicide
  • trespass

Cite this

Ryan, B., Kallberg, V. P., Rådbo, H., Havârneanu, G. M., Silla, A., Lukaschek, K., ... Hedqvist, M. (2018). Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures. Ergonomics, 61(11), 1433-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1485970
Ryan, Brendan ; Kallberg, Veli Pekka ; Rådbo, Helena ; Havârneanu, Grigore M. ; Silla, Anne ; Lukaschek, Karoline ; Burkhardt, Jean Marie ; Bruyelle, Jean Luc ; El-Koursi, El Miloudi ; Beurskens, Eric ; Hedqvist, Maria. / Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures. In: Ergonomics. 2018 ; Vol. 61, No. 11. pp. 1433-1453.
@article{90a4e2293c014fb4acbecf2f16001e95,
title = "Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures",
abstract = "It can be difficult to select from available safety preventative measures, especially where there is limited evidence of effectiveness in different contexts. This paper describes application of a method to identify and evaluate wide-ranging preventative measures for rail suicide and trespass fatalities. Evidence from literature and industry sources was collated and reviewed in a two stage process to achieve consensus among experts on the likely effects of the measures and factors influencing their implementation. Multiple evaluation criteria were used to examine the measures from different perspectives. Fencing, awareness campaigns and different types of organisational initiatives were recommended for further testing. This is the first time evidence has been collected internationally across such a range of preventative measures. Commentary is provided on using this type of approach to select safety measures from a pool of prevention options, including how re-framing the scope of the exercise could identify alternative options for prevention. Practitioner summary: The findings give insight to how different measures work in different ways and how industry can consider this in strategic initiatives. The method could be used in future studies with different frames of reference (e.g. different timescales, level of ambition and safety context e.g. railway crossings or highway fatalities). Abbreviation: RESTRAIL: REduction of Suicides and Trespasses on RAILway property.",
keywords = "evaluation, experts and consensus methods, prevention, Rail fatalities, suicide, trespass",
author = "Brendan Ryan and Kallberg, {Veli Pekka} and Helena R{\aa}dbo and Hav{\^a}rneanu, {Grigore M.} and Anne Silla and Karoline Lukaschek and Burkhardt, {Jean Marie} and Bruyelle, {Jean Luc} and El-Koursi, {El Miloudi} and Eric Beurskens and Maria Hedqvist",
year = "2018",
month = "11",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/00140139.2018.1485970",
language = "English",
volume = "61",
pages = "1433--1453",
journal = "Ergonomics",
issn = "0014-0139",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "11",

}

Ryan, B, Kallberg, VP, Rådbo, H, Havârneanu, GM, Silla, A, Lukaschek, K, Burkhardt, JM, Bruyelle, JL, El-Koursi, EM, Beurskens, E & Hedqvist, M 2018, 'Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures', Ergonomics, vol. 61, no. 11, pp. 1433-1453. https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2018.1485970

Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures. / Ryan, Brendan (Corresponding Author); Kallberg, Veli Pekka; Rådbo, Helena; Havârneanu, Grigore M.; Silla, Anne; Lukaschek, Karoline; Burkhardt, Jean Marie; Bruyelle, Jean Luc; El-Koursi, El Miloudi; Beurskens, Eric; Hedqvist, Maria.

In: Ergonomics, Vol. 61, No. 11, 02.11.2018, p. 1433-1453.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Collecting evidence from distributed sources to evaluate railway suicide and trespass prevention measures

AU - Ryan, Brendan

AU - Kallberg, Veli Pekka

AU - Rådbo, Helena

AU - Havârneanu, Grigore M.

AU - Silla, Anne

AU - Lukaschek, Karoline

AU - Burkhardt, Jean Marie

AU - Bruyelle, Jean Luc

AU - El-Koursi, El Miloudi

AU - Beurskens, Eric

AU - Hedqvist, Maria

PY - 2018/11/2

Y1 - 2018/11/2

N2 - It can be difficult to select from available safety preventative measures, especially where there is limited evidence of effectiveness in different contexts. This paper describes application of a method to identify and evaluate wide-ranging preventative measures for rail suicide and trespass fatalities. Evidence from literature and industry sources was collated and reviewed in a two stage process to achieve consensus among experts on the likely effects of the measures and factors influencing their implementation. Multiple evaluation criteria were used to examine the measures from different perspectives. Fencing, awareness campaigns and different types of organisational initiatives were recommended for further testing. This is the first time evidence has been collected internationally across such a range of preventative measures. Commentary is provided on using this type of approach to select safety measures from a pool of prevention options, including how re-framing the scope of the exercise could identify alternative options for prevention. Practitioner summary: The findings give insight to how different measures work in different ways and how industry can consider this in strategic initiatives. The method could be used in future studies with different frames of reference (e.g. different timescales, level of ambition and safety context e.g. railway crossings or highway fatalities). Abbreviation: RESTRAIL: REduction of Suicides and Trespasses on RAILway property.

AB - It can be difficult to select from available safety preventative measures, especially where there is limited evidence of effectiveness in different contexts. This paper describes application of a method to identify and evaluate wide-ranging preventative measures for rail suicide and trespass fatalities. Evidence from literature and industry sources was collated and reviewed in a two stage process to achieve consensus among experts on the likely effects of the measures and factors influencing their implementation. Multiple evaluation criteria were used to examine the measures from different perspectives. Fencing, awareness campaigns and different types of organisational initiatives were recommended for further testing. This is the first time evidence has been collected internationally across such a range of preventative measures. Commentary is provided on using this type of approach to select safety measures from a pool of prevention options, including how re-framing the scope of the exercise could identify alternative options for prevention. Practitioner summary: The findings give insight to how different measures work in different ways and how industry can consider this in strategic initiatives. The method could be used in future studies with different frames of reference (e.g. different timescales, level of ambition and safety context e.g. railway crossings or highway fatalities). Abbreviation: RESTRAIL: REduction of Suicides and Trespasses on RAILway property.

KW - evaluation

KW - experts and consensus methods

KW - prevention

KW - Rail fatalities

KW - suicide

KW - trespass

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85055719389&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/00140139.2018.1485970

DO - 10.1080/00140139.2018.1485970

M3 - Article

VL - 61

SP - 1433

EP - 1453

JO - Ergonomics

JF - Ergonomics

SN - 0014-0139

IS - 11

ER -