Comparative analysis of deterministic and probabilistic fracture mechanical assessment tools

K. Heckmann, Q. Saifi

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    1 Citation (Scopus)

    Abstract

    Uncertainties in material properties, manufacturing processes, loading conditions and damage mechanisms complicate the quantification of structural reliability. Probabilistic structure mechanical computing codes serve as tools for assessing leakand break probabilities of nuclear piping components. Probabilistic fracture mechanical tools were compared in different benchmark activities, usually revealing minor, but systematic discrepancies between results of different codes. In this joint paper, probabilistic fracture mechanical codes are compared. Crack initiation, crack growth and the influence of in-service inspections are analyzed. Example cases for stress corrosion cracking and fatigue in LWR conditions are analyzed. The evolution of annual failure probabilities during simulated operation time is investigated, in order to identify the reasons for differences in the results of different codes. The comparison of the tools is used for further improvements of the codes applied by the partners.
    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)484-497
    JournalKerntechnik
    Volume81
    Issue number5
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

    Fingerprint

    Corrosion fatigue
    Stress corrosion cracking
    Crack initiation
    structural reliability
    Crack propagation
    Materials properties
    stress corrosion cracking
    Inspection
    crack initiation
    inspection
    manufacturing
    cracks
    damage
    Uncertainty

    Cite this

    @article{9dfa3b5124a148a3ad9bdfaa9baa85a4,
    title = "Comparative analysis of deterministic and probabilistic fracture mechanical assessment tools",
    abstract = "Uncertainties in material properties, manufacturing processes, loading conditions and damage mechanisms complicate the quantification of structural reliability. Probabilistic structure mechanical computing codes serve as tools for assessing leakand break probabilities of nuclear piping components. Probabilistic fracture mechanical tools were compared in different benchmark activities, usually revealing minor, but systematic discrepancies between results of different codes. In this joint paper, probabilistic fracture mechanical codes are compared. Crack initiation, crack growth and the influence of in-service inspections are analyzed. Example cases for stress corrosion cracking and fatigue in LWR conditions are analyzed. The evolution of annual failure probabilities during simulated operation time is investigated, in order to identify the reasons for differences in the results of different codes. The comparison of the tools is used for further improvements of the codes applied by the partners.",
    author = "K. Heckmann and Q. Saifi",
    year = "2016",
    doi = "10.3139/124.110725",
    language = "English",
    volume = "81",
    pages = "484--497",
    journal = "Kerntechnik",
    issn = "0932-3902",
    number = "5",

    }

    Comparative analysis of deterministic and probabilistic fracture mechanical assessment tools. / Heckmann, K.; Saifi, Q.

    In: Kerntechnik, Vol. 81, No. 5, 2016, p. 484-497.

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Comparative analysis of deterministic and probabilistic fracture mechanical assessment tools

    AU - Heckmann, K.

    AU - Saifi, Q.

    PY - 2016

    Y1 - 2016

    N2 - Uncertainties in material properties, manufacturing processes, loading conditions and damage mechanisms complicate the quantification of structural reliability. Probabilistic structure mechanical computing codes serve as tools for assessing leakand break probabilities of nuclear piping components. Probabilistic fracture mechanical tools were compared in different benchmark activities, usually revealing minor, but systematic discrepancies between results of different codes. In this joint paper, probabilistic fracture mechanical codes are compared. Crack initiation, crack growth and the influence of in-service inspections are analyzed. Example cases for stress corrosion cracking and fatigue in LWR conditions are analyzed. The evolution of annual failure probabilities during simulated operation time is investigated, in order to identify the reasons for differences in the results of different codes. The comparison of the tools is used for further improvements of the codes applied by the partners.

    AB - Uncertainties in material properties, manufacturing processes, loading conditions and damage mechanisms complicate the quantification of structural reliability. Probabilistic structure mechanical computing codes serve as tools for assessing leakand break probabilities of nuclear piping components. Probabilistic fracture mechanical tools were compared in different benchmark activities, usually revealing minor, but systematic discrepancies between results of different codes. In this joint paper, probabilistic fracture mechanical codes are compared. Crack initiation, crack growth and the influence of in-service inspections are analyzed. Example cases for stress corrosion cracking and fatigue in LWR conditions are analyzed. The evolution of annual failure probabilities during simulated operation time is investigated, in order to identify the reasons for differences in the results of different codes. The comparison of the tools is used for further improvements of the codes applied by the partners.

    U2 - 10.3139/124.110725

    DO - 10.3139/124.110725

    M3 - Article

    VL - 81

    SP - 484

    EP - 497

    JO - Kerntechnik

    JF - Kerntechnik

    SN - 0932-3902

    IS - 5

    ER -