Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?

Aapo Huovila (Corresponding Author), Peter Bosch, Miimu Airaksinen

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

31 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)141-153
JournalCities
Volume89
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jun 2019
MoE publication typeNot Eligible

Fingerprint

sustainability
manager
city
indicator
analysis
Comparative analysis
implementation process
expert knowledge
performance assessment
evaluation
taxonomy
decision making
monitoring
energy
economy
management
need
Managers
Evaluation
smart city

Keywords

  • Urban indicator
  • Smart sustainable cities
  • Standardization
  • Monitoring
  • Decision making
  • Sustainable Development Goals

Cite this

@article{d43327eb9c134956a71cde8261e41baa,
title = "Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities: What indicators and standards to use and when?",
abstract = "City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation.",
keywords = "Urban indicator, Smart sustainable cities, Standardization, Monitoring, Decision making, Sustainable Development Goals",
author = "Aapo Huovila and Peter Bosch and Miimu Airaksinen",
year = "2019",
month = "6",
doi = "10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029",
language = "English",
volume = "89",
pages = "141--153",
journal = "Cities",
issn = "0264-2751",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities : What indicators and standards to use and when? / Huovila, Aapo (Corresponding Author); Bosch, Peter; Airaksinen, Miimu.

In: Cities, Vol. 89, 06.2019, p. 141-153.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparative analysis of standardized indicators for Smart sustainable cities

T2 - What indicators and standards to use and when?

AU - Huovila, Aapo

AU - Bosch, Peter

AU - Airaksinen, Miimu

PY - 2019/6

Y1 - 2019/6

N2 - City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation.

AB - City managers need indicators for target setting, performance assessment, monitoring, management and decision-making purposes. The choice of the most suitable indicator framework is crucial, but difficult, as it requires expert knowledge. To help cities in their choice, this paper compares seven recently published indicator standards for Smart sustainable cities. A taxonomy was developed to evaluate each of their 413 indicators against five conceptual urban focuses (types of urban sustainability and smartness), ten sectoral application domains (energy, transport, ICT, economy, etc.) and five indicator types (input, process, output, outcome, impact). The results clearly discriminate between indicator standards suited for evaluating the implementation of predominantly smart city approaches versus standards more focused on sustainability assessment. A further distinction is possible in standards almost fully oriented towards impacts reached, and standards that allow for progress evaluation according to steps in the implementation process. Some standards provide a narrow focus on output indicators evaluating the progress in implementing smart urban ICT solutions (e.g. number of smart meters installed). Cities are encouraged to complement such evaluations with impact indicators that demonstrate the effects of those solutions. This paper provides guidance for city managers and policy makers to select the indicators and standard that best correspond to their assessment need and goals, and align with their stage in Smart sustainable city implementation.

KW - Urban indicator

KW - Smart sustainable cities

KW - Standardization

KW - Monitoring

KW - Decision making

KW - Sustainable Development Goals

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85060545613&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029

DO - 10.1016/j.cities.2019.01.029

M3 - Article

VL - 89

SP - 141

EP - 153

JO - Cities

JF - Cities

SN - 0264-2751

ER -