Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles

A literature review

Risto Lautkaski

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

Abstract

Some twenty comparative assessments of the health impacts of different sources of energy have been published since 1974. The critical review by Paskievici, however, indicates that only a few of the studies are independent. Most authors quote the results of previous studies or rest on a few primary sources. The method used in the studies is to estimate the number of deaths, diseases and injuries attributable to the production of a given amount of eletric energy. However, this method involves a number of subtle methodical and conceptual problems. In this report these problems are reviewed to give an idea of how they are reflected in the assessed risk values for coal, oil and uranium fuel cycles. The best estimates recommended by Paskievici for the risk values of different fuel cycles are reviewed. On the basis of these values the corresponding health risks in a fuelimporting country have been assessed. Finally, the results of a Finnish health risk study from 1980 comparing peat, coal and nuclear energy are updated utilizing measured emission values.
Original languageEnglish
Place of PublicationEspoo
PublisherVTT Technical Research Centre of Finland
Number of pages82
ISBN (Print)951-38-1863-2
Publication statusPublished - 1983
MoE publication typeD4 Published development or research report or study

Publication series

NameTiedotteita / Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus
PublisherVTT
Volume251

Fingerprint

literature review
health risk
uranium
fossil
coal
health impact
energy
peat
oil
method
nuclear energy

Cite this

Lautkaski, R. (1983). Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles: A literature review. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland. Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita, No. 251
Lautkaski, Risto. / Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles : A literature review. Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1983. 82 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 251).
@book{f0aa7c8c16954285b60b7ebb68521be6,
title = "Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles: A literature review",
abstract = "Some twenty comparative assessments of the health impacts of different sources of energy have been published since 1974. The critical review by Paskievici, however, indicates that only a few of the studies are independent. Most authors quote the results of previous studies or rest on a few primary sources. The method used in the studies is to estimate the number of deaths, diseases and injuries attributable to the production of a given amount of eletric energy. However, this method involves a number of subtle methodical and conceptual problems. In this report these problems are reviewed to give an idea of how they are reflected in the assessed risk values for coal, oil and uranium fuel cycles. The best estimates recommended by Paskievici for the risk values of different fuel cycles are reviewed. On the basis of these values the corresponding health risks in a fuelimporting country have been assessed. Finally, the results of a Finnish health risk study from 1980 comparing peat, coal and nuclear energy are updated utilizing measured emission values.",
author = "Risto Lautkaski",
year = "1983",
language = "English",
isbn = "951-38-1863-2",
series = "Tiedotteita / Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus",
publisher = "VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland",
address = "Finland",

}

Lautkaski, R 1983, Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles: A literature review. Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita, no. 251, VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, Espoo.

Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles : A literature review. / Lautkaski, Risto.

Espoo : VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1983. 82 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 251).

Research output: Book/ReportReportProfessional

TY - BOOK

T1 - Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles

T2 - A literature review

AU - Lautkaski, Risto

PY - 1983

Y1 - 1983

N2 - Some twenty comparative assessments of the health impacts of different sources of energy have been published since 1974. The critical review by Paskievici, however, indicates that only a few of the studies are independent. Most authors quote the results of previous studies or rest on a few primary sources. The method used in the studies is to estimate the number of deaths, diseases and injuries attributable to the production of a given amount of eletric energy. However, this method involves a number of subtle methodical and conceptual problems. In this report these problems are reviewed to give an idea of how they are reflected in the assessed risk values for coal, oil and uranium fuel cycles. The best estimates recommended by Paskievici for the risk values of different fuel cycles are reviewed. On the basis of these values the corresponding health risks in a fuelimporting country have been assessed. Finally, the results of a Finnish health risk study from 1980 comparing peat, coal and nuclear energy are updated utilizing measured emission values.

AB - Some twenty comparative assessments of the health impacts of different sources of energy have been published since 1974. The critical review by Paskievici, however, indicates that only a few of the studies are independent. Most authors quote the results of previous studies or rest on a few primary sources. The method used in the studies is to estimate the number of deaths, diseases and injuries attributable to the production of a given amount of eletric energy. However, this method involves a number of subtle methodical and conceptual problems. In this report these problems are reviewed to give an idea of how they are reflected in the assessed risk values for coal, oil and uranium fuel cycles. The best estimates recommended by Paskievici for the risk values of different fuel cycles are reviewed. On the basis of these values the corresponding health risks in a fuelimporting country have been assessed. Finally, the results of a Finnish health risk study from 1980 comparing peat, coal and nuclear energy are updated utilizing measured emission values.

M3 - Report

SN - 951-38-1863-2

T3 - Tiedotteita / Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus

BT - Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles

PB - VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland

CY - Espoo

ER -

Lautkaski R. Comparative risks from fossil and uranium fuel cycles: A literature review. Espoo: VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland, 1983. 82 p. (Valtion teknillinen tutkimuskeskus. Tiedotteita; No. 251).