Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems

Pekka Salminen (Corresponding Author), Joonas Hokkanen, Risto Lahdelma

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

180 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The present paper gives an analysis of the use of ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE I, II, and SMART decision-aids in the context of four different real applications to environmental problems in Finland. These methods are widely used decision-aids in the real planning processes.
The purpose of this study is to define the differences of these methods and the results obtained with them, and in this way also to consider their applicability in aiding environmental decision-making. Furthermore, a comparison of the methods based on a set of randomly generated problems is carried out. The choice in practice will not be easy; PROMETHEE does not differ much from SMART with linear value functions, and in many cases this holds for ELECTRE III, too.
However, in a particular problem the `best alternatives' obtained with these methods may differ greatly. Therefore, the conclusion is that it is better to use several methods for the same problem when possible; when not, we recommend the use of ELECTRE III.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)485-496
JournalEuropean Journal of Operational Research
Volume104
Issue number3
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1998
MoE publication typeA1 Journal article-refereed

Fingerprint

Multi-criteria
Decision making
Planning
Telescoping a series
Process Planning
Value Function
Linear Function
Decision Making
Context
Multicriteria methods
Alternatives
Electre III
Decision aids

Cite this

Salminen, Pekka ; Hokkanen, Joonas ; Lahdelma, Risto. / Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. In: European Journal of Operational Research. 1998 ; Vol. 104, No. 3. pp. 485-496.
@article{694396f2c87d4648b6669c13ee5ea610,
title = "Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems",
abstract = "The present paper gives an analysis of the use of ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE I, II, and SMART decision-aids in the context of four different real applications to environmental problems in Finland. These methods are widely used decision-aids in the real planning processes. The purpose of this study is to define the differences of these methods and the results obtained with them, and in this way also to consider their applicability in aiding environmental decision-making. Furthermore, a comparison of the methods based on a set of randomly generated problems is carried out. The choice in practice will not be easy; PROMETHEE does not differ much from SMART with linear value functions, and in many cases this holds for ELECTRE III, too. However, in a particular problem the `best alternatives' obtained with these methods may differ greatly. Therefore, the conclusion is that it is better to use several methods for the same problem when possible; when not, we recommend the use of ELECTRE III.",
author = "Pekka Salminen and Joonas Hokkanen and Risto Lahdelma",
year = "1998",
doi = "10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00370-0",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "485--496",
journal = "European Journal of Operational Research",
issn = "0377-2217",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "3",

}

Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems. / Salminen, Pekka (Corresponding Author); Hokkanen, Joonas; Lahdelma, Risto.

In: European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 104, No. 3, 1998, p. 485-496.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleScientificpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing multicriteria methods in the context of environmental problems

AU - Salminen, Pekka

AU - Hokkanen, Joonas

AU - Lahdelma, Risto

PY - 1998

Y1 - 1998

N2 - The present paper gives an analysis of the use of ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE I, II, and SMART decision-aids in the context of four different real applications to environmental problems in Finland. These methods are widely used decision-aids in the real planning processes. The purpose of this study is to define the differences of these methods and the results obtained with them, and in this way also to consider their applicability in aiding environmental decision-making. Furthermore, a comparison of the methods based on a set of randomly generated problems is carried out. The choice in practice will not be easy; PROMETHEE does not differ much from SMART with linear value functions, and in many cases this holds for ELECTRE III, too. However, in a particular problem the `best alternatives' obtained with these methods may differ greatly. Therefore, the conclusion is that it is better to use several methods for the same problem when possible; when not, we recommend the use of ELECTRE III.

AB - The present paper gives an analysis of the use of ELECTRE III, PROMETHEE I, II, and SMART decision-aids in the context of four different real applications to environmental problems in Finland. These methods are widely used decision-aids in the real planning processes. The purpose of this study is to define the differences of these methods and the results obtained with them, and in this way also to consider their applicability in aiding environmental decision-making. Furthermore, a comparison of the methods based on a set of randomly generated problems is carried out. The choice in practice will not be easy; PROMETHEE does not differ much from SMART with linear value functions, and in many cases this holds for ELECTRE III, too. However, in a particular problem the `best alternatives' obtained with these methods may differ greatly. Therefore, the conclusion is that it is better to use several methods for the same problem when possible; when not, we recommend the use of ELECTRE III.

U2 - 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00370-0

DO - 10.1016/S0377-2217(96)00370-0

M3 - Article

VL - 104

SP - 485

EP - 496

JO - European Journal of Operational Research

JF - European Journal of Operational Research

SN - 0377-2217

IS - 3

ER -