TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparing plastic foils for dew collection
T2 - Preparatory laboratory-scale method and field experiment in Kenya
AU - Tuure, Juuso
AU - Korpela, Antti
AU - Hautala, Mikko
AU - Rautkoski, Hille
AU - Hakojärvi, Mikko
AU - Mikkola, Hannu
AU - Duplissy, Jonathan
AU - Pellikka, Petri
AU - Petäjä, Tuukka
AU - Kulmala, Markku
AU - Alakukku, Laura
PY - 2020/8
Y1 - 2020/8
N2 - Passive dew collection could be a viable option as a source of irrigation water in arid areas. The plastic foil acting as a condensing surface plays a key role in the passive dew collection regime. A laboratory method for comparing various plastic foils for dew collection was prepared and tested. The focus was on creating a method for measuring the attributes affecting dew condensation and the flow of dew droplets on the measured surface. A low-density polyethylene foil designed for dew collection, white polyethylene plastic, black polyethylene plastic, and white polyvinyl chloride plastic were used as the test plastics. The laboratory dew yields were compared with model calculations. In addition, field trials were conducted in arid conditions in Maktau, Kenya, to compare with the laboratory measurement. Results from the hardware model tests were not reflected in the results obtained from the field conditions. The laboratory tests showed that the dew-harvesting quality of plastic foils is difficult to evaluate using the laboratory test rig. A more comprehensive evaluation regime requires tests performed in field conditions or further development of the test rig used here.
AB - Passive dew collection could be a viable option as a source of irrigation water in arid areas. The plastic foil acting as a condensing surface plays a key role in the passive dew collection regime. A laboratory method for comparing various plastic foils for dew collection was prepared and tested. The focus was on creating a method for measuring the attributes affecting dew condensation and the flow of dew droplets on the measured surface. A low-density polyethylene foil designed for dew collection, white polyethylene plastic, black polyethylene plastic, and white polyvinyl chloride plastic were used as the test plastics. The laboratory dew yields were compared with model calculations. In addition, field trials were conducted in arid conditions in Maktau, Kenya, to compare with the laboratory measurement. Results from the hardware model tests were not reflected in the results obtained from the field conditions. The laboratory tests showed that the dew-harvesting quality of plastic foils is difficult to evaluate using the laboratory test rig. A more comprehensive evaluation regime requires tests performed in field conditions or further development of the test rig used here.
KW - Dew harvesting
KW - Drought
KW - Plastic foil
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85087200546
U2 - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.05.016
DO - 10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2020.05.016
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:85087200546
SN - 1537-5110
VL - 196
SP - 145
EP - 158
JO - Biosystems Engineering
JF - Biosystems Engineering
ER -