Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software

Timo Malm, Marita Hietikko, Jari Rauhamäki

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

Abstract

According to many sources, most of the defects of excellent software are produced in the requirements specification phase of the software design process. In average software, the share is also remarkable. There are many kinds of sources for safety requirements specification, and they address different aspects of safety. The origin of safety requirements is risk assessment, but other sources are also needed. The machine standards describe most of the risks related to the specific machine, and furthermore present them as complete requirements. Functional safety standards give information on safety principles, design process safety integrity, safety functions and methods. This paper compares different sources of requirements by using an example, which is related to the boom control of a mobile elevating work platform. The example shows requirement sources, examples of related requirements and to which aspects the designer should pay attention
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012
Place of PublicationRed Hook, NY
PublisherCurran Associates Inc.
ISBN (Print)978-1-62276-436-5
Publication statusPublished - 2012
MoE publication typeA4 Article in a conference publication
Event11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, PSAM11 & ESREL 2012 - Helsinki, Finland
Duration: 25 Jun 201229 Jun 2012

Conference

Conference11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, PSAM11 & ESREL 2012
CountryFinland
CityHelsinki
Period25/06/1229/06/12

Fingerprint

Machinery
Specifications
Software design
Risk assessment
Defects

Keywords

  • Software
  • machinery
  • safety requirements
  • standards

Cite this

Malm, T., Hietikko, M., & Rauhamäki, J. (2012). Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software. In 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012 Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates Inc..
Malm, Timo ; Hietikko, Marita ; Rauhamäki, Jari. / Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software. 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012. Red Hook, NY : Curran Associates Inc., 2012.
@inproceedings{5c01e5a2f5b34ad39e2c232c5f739ae2,
title = "Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software",
abstract = "According to many sources, most of the defects of excellent software are produced in the requirements specification phase of the software design process. In average software, the share is also remarkable. There are many kinds of sources for safety requirements specification, and they address different aspects of safety. The origin of safety requirements is risk assessment, but other sources are also needed. The machine standards describe most of the risks related to the specific machine, and furthermore present them as complete requirements. Functional safety standards give information on safety principles, design process safety integrity, safety functions and methods. This paper compares different sources of requirements by using an example, which is related to the boom control of a mobile elevating work platform. The example shows requirement sources, examples of related requirements and to which aspects the designer should pay attention",
keywords = "Software, machinery, safety requirements, standards",
author = "Timo Malm and Marita Hietikko and Jari Rauham{\"a}ki",
note = "Project code: 32542 Abstracts p. 228, conference material 10 p.",
year = "2012",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-1-62276-436-5",
booktitle = "11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012",
publisher = "Curran Associates Inc.",
address = "United States",

}

Malm, T, Hietikko, M & Rauhamäki, J 2012, Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software. in 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012. Curran Associates Inc., Red Hook, NY, 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and The Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference, PSAM11 & ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25/06/12.

Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software. / Malm, Timo; Hietikko, Marita; Rauhamäki, Jari.

11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012. Red Hook, NY : Curran Associates Inc., 2012.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingConference article in proceedingsScientificpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software

AU - Malm, Timo

AU - Hietikko, Marita

AU - Rauhamäki, Jari

N1 - Project code: 32542 Abstracts p. 228, conference material 10 p.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - According to many sources, most of the defects of excellent software are produced in the requirements specification phase of the software design process. In average software, the share is also remarkable. There are many kinds of sources for safety requirements specification, and they address different aspects of safety. The origin of safety requirements is risk assessment, but other sources are also needed. The machine standards describe most of the risks related to the specific machine, and furthermore present them as complete requirements. Functional safety standards give information on safety principles, design process safety integrity, safety functions and methods. This paper compares different sources of requirements by using an example, which is related to the boom control of a mobile elevating work platform. The example shows requirement sources, examples of related requirements and to which aspects the designer should pay attention

AB - According to many sources, most of the defects of excellent software are produced in the requirements specification phase of the software design process. In average software, the share is also remarkable. There are many kinds of sources for safety requirements specification, and they address different aspects of safety. The origin of safety requirements is risk assessment, but other sources are also needed. The machine standards describe most of the risks related to the specific machine, and furthermore present them as complete requirements. Functional safety standards give information on safety principles, design process safety integrity, safety functions and methods. This paper compares different sources of requirements by using an example, which is related to the boom control of a mobile elevating work platform. The example shows requirement sources, examples of related requirements and to which aspects the designer should pay attention

KW - Software

KW - machinery

KW - safety requirements

KW - standards

M3 - Conference article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-62276-436-5

BT - 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012

PB - Curran Associates Inc.

CY - Red Hook, NY

ER -

Malm T, Hietikko M, Rauhamäki J. Comparing safety requirement sources of machinery software. In 11th International Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Management Conference and the Annual European Safety and Reliability Conference 2012 PSAM11 ESREL 2012, Helsinki, Finland, 25-29 June, 2012. Red Hook, NY: Curran Associates Inc. 2012